Advertisement

Medicinal Chemistry Research

, Volume 26, Issue 12, pp 3375–3383 | Cite as

DNA interaction of bromomethyl-substituted acridines

  • Kazuya Harada
  • Takahiro Imai
  • Junko Kizu
  • Masataka Mochizuki
  • Keiko Inami
Original Research
  • 157 Downloads

Abstract

A series of acridines with bifunctional substituents was synthesized with the dual properties of DNA alkylation and intercalation. 4,5-Bis(bromomethyl)acridine (1) was previously reported to crosslink and intercalate with DNA. In this study, 1,8-bis(bromomethyl)acridine (2) and 2,7-bis(bromomethyl)acridine (3), monofunctional 2-(bromomethyl)-7-methylacridine (4) and 2,7-dimethylacridine (5) were synthesized, and their crosslinking and intercalative activities were investigated to assess the reactivity of bromomethyl acridines with DNA. Interstrand crosslinking activity was similar among the three bis(bromomethyl)acridines. The acridines exhibited intercalation activity for calf thymus DNA as follows: 3 > 4 > 2 = 1 >>> 5. Intracellular DNA-crosslinking and DNA-intercalating activities were evaluated using the Ames assay. 4 was mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium TA100 and TA98, indicating that the bromomethyl group alkylated DNA bases. All three bis(bromomethyl)acridines were mutagenic in S. typhimurium TA92 and TA94, which can detect intracellular crosslinking DNA damage, whereas 5 was not mutagenic in these strains. The results showed that the bis(bromomethyl)acridines crosslinked DNA and intercalated between DNA bases, and 3 exhibited the highest crosslinking and intercalating activity.

Keywords

Acridine Halomethyl group Crosslink Intercalation Mutagenicity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and by a Grant-in-Aid for the Science Research Promotion Fund from the Japan Private School Promotion Foundation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

44_2017_2030_MOESM1_ESM.docx (548 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Ames BN, Lee FD, Durston WE (1973) An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:782–786CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Baguley BC, Denny WA, Atwell GJ, Cain BF (1981) Potential antitumor agents. 34. Quantitative relationships between DNA binding and molecular structure for 9-anilinoacridines substituted in the anilino ring. J Med Chem 24:170–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartoli S, Bazzicalupi C, Biagini S, Borsari L, Bencini A, Faggi E, Giorgi C, Sangregorio C, Valtancoli B (2009) Cu(II) complexation with an acridine-containing macrocycle. Assembly of water cluster chains within the cavity of tetranuclear metallomacrocycles. Dalton Trans 1223–1230Google Scholar
  4. Basu AK, Marnett LJ, Romano LJ (1984) Dissociation of malondialdehyde mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium from its ability to induce interstrand DNA cross-links. Mutat Res 129:39–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown BR, Firt WJ, Yielding LW (1980) Acridine structure correlated with mutagenic activity in Salmonella. Mutat Res 72:373–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brulikova L, Hlavac J, Hradil P (2012) DNA interstrand cross-linking agents and their chemotherapeutic potential. Curr Med Chem 19:364–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiron J, Galy J (2003) Reactivity of the acridine ring: One-pot regioselective single and double bromomethylation of acridine and some derivatives. Synlett 15:2349–2350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demeunynck M, Charmantray F, Martelli A (2001) Interest of acridine derivatives in the anticancer chemotherapy. Curr Pharm Des 7:1703–1724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimroth O, Criegee R (1957) Über Einige meso-substituierte dihydroacridine und ihre dehydrierungsprodukte. Chem Ber 90:2207–2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehsanian R, Van Waes C, Feller SM (2011) Beyond DNA binding - a review of the potential mechanisms mediating quinacrine’s therapeutic activities in parasitic infections, inflammation, and cancers. Cell Commun Signal 9:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao C, Li B, Zhang B, Sun Q, Li L, Li X, Chen C, Tan C, Liu H, Jiang Y (2015) Synthesis and biological evaluation of benzimidazole acridine derivatives as potential DNA-binding and apoptosis-inducing agents. Bioorg Med Chem 23:1800–1807CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gates KS (2009) An overview of chemical processes that damage cellular DNA: spontaneous hydrolysis, alkylation, and reactions with radicals. Chem Res Toxicol 22:1747–1760CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartley JA, Berardini MD, Souhami L (1981) An agarose gel method for the determination of DNA interstrand crosslinking applicable to the measurement of the rate of total and “second-arm” crosslink reactions. Anal Biochem 193:131–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haroun L, Ames BN (1981a) Mutagenicity of selected chemicals in the Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity test. In: De Serres F, Shelby MD (eds) Comparative chemical mutagenesis. Plenum Press, New York, NY, p 27–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haroun L, Ames BN (1981b) The Salmonella mutagenicity test: an overview. In: Stich HF, San RHC (eds) Short-term tests for chemical carcinogens. Springer, New York, NY, p 108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Higashi T, Inami K, Mochizuki M (2008a) Synthesis and DNA-binding properties of 1,10-phenanthroline analogues as intercalating-crosslinkers. J Heterocycl Chem 45:1889–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Higashi T, Sakamoto M, Mochizuki M (2008b) Synthesis of acridine analogues as intercalating crosslinkers and evaluation of their potential anticancer properties. Heterocycles 75:1943–1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Higashi T, Uemura K, Inami K, Mochizuki M (2009) Unique behavior of 2,6-bis(bromomethyl)naphthalene as a highly active organic DNA crosslinking molecule. Bioorg Med Chem 17:3568–3571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang Y, Li L (2013) DNA crosslinking damage and cancer - a tale of friend and foe. Transl Cancer Res 2:144–154PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hurley LH (2002) DNA and its associated processes as targets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2:188–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ishikawa S, Tajima M, Mochizuki M (2004) Synthesis and properties of bifunctional chloroalkyl nitrosamines with an intercalating moiety. Bioorg Med Chem 12:3791–3796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Inami K, Ishikawa S, Mochizuki M (2009) Activation mechanism of N-nitrosodialkylamines as environmental mutagens and its application to antitumor research. Genes Environ 31:97–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ketron AC, Denny WA, Graves DE, Osheroff N (2012) Amsacrine as a topoisomerase II poison: importance of drug-DNA interactions. Biochemistry 51:1730–1739CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Löber G, Achtert G (1969) On the complex formation of acridine dyes with DNA. VII. Dependence of the binding on the dye structure. Biopolymers 8:595–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Louie AC, Issell BF (1985) Amsacrine (AMSA)-a clinical review. J Clin Oncol 3:562–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nitiss JL (2009) Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 9:338–350CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Noll DM, Mason TM, Miller PS (2006) Formation and repair of interstrand cross-links in DNA. Chem Rev 106:277–301CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Maron DM, Ames BN (1983) Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 113:173–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mortelmans K, Zeiger E (2000) The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutat Res 455:29–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sakore TD, Jain SC, Tsai C, Sobell HM (1977) Acridine: 5-iodocytidylyl- (3’-5’)guanosine crystalline complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:188–192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Sasikala WD, Mukherjee A (2013) Intercalation and de-intercalation pathway of proflavine through the minor and major grooves of DNA: roles of water and entropy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:6446–6455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmidt A, Liu M (2015) Chapter Four – Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Acridines. Adv Heterocycl Chem 115:287–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shieh HS, Berman HM, Dabrow M, Neidle S (1980) The structure of drug-deoxydinucleoside phosphate complex; generalized conformational behavior of intercalation complexes with RNA and DNA fragments. Nucleic Acids Res 8:85–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Su T, Lin Y, Chou T, Zhang X, Bacherikov VA, Chen C, Liu LF, Tsai T (2006) Potent antitumor 9-anilinoacridines and acridines bearing an alkylating N-mustard residue on the acridine chromophore: synthesis and biological activity. J Med Chem 49:3710–3718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuya Harada
    • 1
  • Takahiro Imai
    • 1
  • Junko Kizu
    • 2
  • Masataka Mochizuki
    • 1
  • Keiko Inami
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesTokyo University of ScienceNoda-shiJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of PharmacyKeio UniversityMinato-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations