Skip to main content
Log in

Nest architecture, worker reproduction, and polygyny in the ponerine ant Harpegnathos venator

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Indian jumping ant Harpegnathos saltator is one of the most well-studied ant species; however, little is known about the biology and behavior of sister species in the genus. To understand the universality of the phenomena revealed in H. saltator, biological studies of closely related species are important. We investigated the nest architecture and colony reproductive structure of Harpegnathos venator at two sites in northern Thailand. Nests had chimney-like entrances with a funnel diameter of about 3 cm and consisted of two or three chambers, the floors of which were flat and smooth. The floors and walls inside the chambers were decorated with several small fragments of cocoons, which has been referred to as “wall-papering”. Most colonies included one or more mated dealate queens that laid eggs, whereas only a few mated workers reproduced in the queenright colonies. In our sampling, virgin dealate queens were found in several colonies, but there were very few queenless colonies that reproduced by mated workers. Additional colonies collected from three other sites in Thailand also had dealate queens. The H. venator colonies reproduced mainly by mated queens, although many mated workers were present. The nest architecture of H. venator was similar to that of H. saltator, but the colony reproductive structure was different: queen colonies of H. saltator are always monogynous, and queenless colonies that reproduce by gamergates are frequently found. Furthermore, virgin dealate queens are never found in H. saltator. Factors affecting these differences between the two congeneric species are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all staff at Omkoi Natural Forest and Khoon Tuen Forest at Chiang Mai Province for their assistance in the field; Ayako Gotoh, Riou Mizuno, Weetuwadee Sangtao, and Songwut Krutkaew for their help in collecting the ant colonies for this study; two anonymous reviewers for useful comments; and Johan Billen for comments and improving the English text. We also acknowledge all members of the Laboratory of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Japan, and the Laboratory of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, for supporting this research. This work was supported in part by two grants for Overseas Research (B 24405010; B16H05769) from JSPS.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, B 24405010, Fuminori Ito, B16H05769, Fuminori Ito

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Aupanun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aupanun, S., Jaitrong, W., Suttiprapan, P. et al. Nest architecture, worker reproduction, and polygyny in the ponerine ant Harpegnathos venator. Insect. Soc. 69, 185–195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-022-00857-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-022-00857-5

Keywords

Navigation