Abstract
The Indian jumping ant Harpegnathos saltator is one of the most well-studied ant species; however, little is known about the biology and behavior of sister species in the genus. To understand the universality of the phenomena revealed in H. saltator, biological studies of closely related species are important. We investigated the nest architecture and colony reproductive structure of Harpegnathos venator at two sites in northern Thailand. Nests had chimney-like entrances with a funnel diameter of about 3 cm and consisted of two or three chambers, the floors of which were flat and smooth. The floors and walls inside the chambers were decorated with several small fragments of cocoons, which has been referred to as “wall-papering”. Most colonies included one or more mated dealate queens that laid eggs, whereas only a few mated workers reproduced in the queenright colonies. In our sampling, virgin dealate queens were found in several colonies, but there were very few queenless colonies that reproduced by mated workers. Additional colonies collected from three other sites in Thailand also had dealate queens. The H. venator colonies reproduced mainly by mated queens, although many mated workers were present. The nest architecture of H. venator was similar to that of H. saltator, but the colony reproductive structure was different: queen colonies of H. saltator are always monogynous, and queenless colonies that reproduce by gamergates are frequently found. Furthermore, virgin dealate queens are never found in H. saltator. Factors affecting these differences between the two congeneric species are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allard D, Hulle M, Billen J, Gobin B (2008) Multiply mating males in Gnamptogenys striatula Mayr (hymenoptera, formicidae). J Insect Behav 21:476–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-008-9143-2
Blatrix R, Jaisson P (2000) Optional gamergates in the queenright ponerine ant Gnamptogenys striatula mayr. Insect Soc 47:193–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001701
Bolton B. (2021) Subfamily: ponerinae. IOP publishing physicsweb. https://www.antweb.org. Accessed 26 February 2021
Bonasio R et al (2010) Genomic comparison of the ants Camponotus floridanus and Harpegnathos saltator. Sci (New York, NY) 329:1068–1071. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192428
Bonasio R et al (2012) Genome-wide and caste-specific DNA methylomes of the ants Camponotus floridanus and Harpegnathos saltator. Curr Biol 22:1755–1764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.042
Boomsma JJ, Baer B, Henze J (2005) The evolution of male traits in social insects. Ann Rev Entomol 50:395–420
Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Crosland M (1995) Nest and colony structure in the primitive ant, Harpegnathos venator (Smith) (hymenoptera: formicidae). Pan-Pac Entomol 71:18–23
Dietemann V, Peeters C, Hölldobler B (2004) Gamergates in the Australian ant subfamily myrmeciinae. Naturwissenschaften 91:432–435
Gobin B, Peeters C, Billen J (1997) Colony reproduction and arboreal life in the ponerine ant Gnamptogenys menadensis (hymenoptera: formicidae). Neth J Zool 48:53–63
Heinze J, Hölldobler B, Yamauchi K (1998) Male competition in Cardiocondyla ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:239–246
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1977) The number of queens: An important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 64:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00439886
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1994) Journey to the ants: a story of scientific exploration. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Massachusetts
Ito F (1993) Functional monogyny and dominance hierarchy in the queenless ponerine ant Pachycondyla (=Bothroponera) sp. in West Java, Indonesia (hymenoptera, formicidae, ponerinae). Ethol 95:126–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1993.tb00463.x
Ito F (2005) Mechanisms regulating functional monogyny in a Japanese population of Leptothorax acervorum (hymenoptera, formicidae): dominance hierarchy and preferential egg cannibalism. Belg J Zool 135:3–8
Ito F (2016) Nesting and reproductive biology of Platythyrea sp. (paralella-group) in the Bogor botanic gardens West java Indonesia (hymenoptera: formicidae). Asian Myrmecol 8:111–117. https://doi.org/10.20362/am.008013
Ito F, Ohkawara K (1994) Spermatheca size differentiation between queens and workers in primitive ants. Naturwissenschaften 81:138–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131772
Ito F, Yusoff NR, Idris AH (1996) Colony composition and queen behavior in polygynous colonies of the oriental ponerine ant Odontomachus rixosus (hymenoptera formicidae). Insectes Soc 43:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01253958
Ito F, Ikeshita Y, Gotoh A, Hashim R (2007) Reproduction by queens and gamergates in the oriental ponerine ant Pachycondyla (= Ectomomyrmex) leeuwenhoeki var. sumatrensis. Forel J Sci Technol Trop 3:65–68
Keller L, Passera L, Suzzoni JP (1989) Queen execution in the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humiis. Physiol Entomol 14:157–163
Laskis KO, Tschinkel WR (2009) The seasonal natural history of the ant, Dolichoderus mariae, in northern Florida. J Insect Sci 9:2. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.009.0201
Liebig J, Poethke HJ (2004) Queen lifespan and colony longevity in the ant Harpegnathos saltator. Ecol Entomol 29(2):203–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2004.00583.x
Masuko K, Murakami M, Matumoto T (1998) Polygyny and monoandry in the ant Formica japonica (hymenoptera: formicidae). Zool Sci 15:409–414
Monnin T, Peeters C (2008) How many gamergates is an ant queen worth? Naturwissenschaften 95:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0297-0
Opachaloemphan C, Mancini G, Konstantinides N, Parikh A, Mlejnek J, Yan H, Reinberg D, Desplan C (2021) Early behavioral and molecular events leading to caste switching in the ant Harpegnathos. Gene Dev 35:410–424
Peeters C (2012) Convergent evolution of wingless reproductives across all subfamilies of ants, and sporadic loss of winged queens (hymenoptera: formicidae). Myrmecol News 16:75–91. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.844241
Peeters C, Fisher B (2016) Gamergates (mated egg-laying workers) and queens both reproduce in Euponera sikorae ants from Madagascar. Afr Entomol 24:180–187. https://doi.org/10.4001/003.024.0180
Peeters C, Hölldobler B (1995) Reproductive cooperation between queens and their mated workers: the complex life history of an ant with a valuable nest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:10977–10979. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.24.10977
Peeters C, Hölldobler B, Moffett M, Ali TM (1994) “Wall-papering” and elaborate nest architecture in the ponerine ant Harpegnathos saltator. Insectes Soc 41:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240479
Peeters C, Liebig J, Hölldobler B (2000) Sexual reproduction by both queens and workers in the ponerine ant Harpegnathos saltator. Insectes Soc 47:325–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001724
Penick CA, Liebig J, Brent CS (2011) Reproduction, dominance, and caste: endocrine profiles of queens and workers of the ant Harpegnathos saltator. J Comp Physiol 197:1063–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-011-0667-0
Penick CA, Ghaninia M, Haight KL, Opachaloemphan C, Yan H, Reinberg D, Liebig J (2021) Reversible plasticity in brain size, behaviour and physiology characterizes caste transitions in a socially flexible ant (Harpegnathos saltator). Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 288:20210141. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0141
Sieber KR, Dorman T, Newell N, Yan H (2021) (Epi) Genetic nechanisms underlying the evolutionary success of eusocial insects. Insects 12:498. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060498
Sommer K, Hölldobler B, Jessen K (1994) The unusual social organization of the ant Pachycondyla tridentata (formicidae, ponerinae). J Ethol 12:175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350062
Trible W et al (2017) Orco mutagenesis causes loss of antennal lobe glomeruli and impaired social behavior in ants. Cell 170:727–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.001
Yan H et al (2017) An engineered orco mutation produces aberrant social behavior and defective neural development in ants. Cell 170:736-747.e739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.051
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all staff at Omkoi Natural Forest and Khoon Tuen Forest at Chiang Mai Province for their assistance in the field; Ayako Gotoh, Riou Mizuno, Weetuwadee Sangtao, and Songwut Krutkaew for their help in collecting the ant colonies for this study; two anonymous reviewers for useful comments; and Johan Billen for comments and improving the English text. We also acknowledge all members of the Laboratory of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Japan, and the Laboratory of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, for supporting this research. This work was supported in part by two grants for Overseas Research (B 24405010; B16H05769) from JSPS.
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, B 24405010, Fuminori Ito, B16H05769, Fuminori Ito
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aupanun, S., Jaitrong, W., Suttiprapan, P. et al. Nest architecture, worker reproduction, and polygyny in the ponerine ant Harpegnathos venator. Insect. Soc. 69, 185–195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-022-00857-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-022-00857-5