Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond temporal-polyethism: division of labor in the eusocial bee Melipona marginata

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Division of labor plays a fundamental role in colony organization in social insects. In many species, division of labor is based on temporal behavioral castes, whereby workers change tasks as they age. However, division of labor remains relatively poorly understood in the large and diverse group of stingless bees (Meliponini), particularly in the largest and economically important genus Melipona. Recent research suggests that stingless bees can differ considerably from other eusocial bees in their division of labor. Here, we studied the lifetime task performance of individually marked workers of the Brazilian species Melipona marginata. We found that colony organization in M. marginata is characterized by temporal castes and a tendency for elitism, i.e. positive performance correlations across the major tasks. Additionally, we also found that individual workers differ considerably in their work profiles and overall effort. A cluster analysis found evidence for a group of workers that are particularly active in wax manipulation and cell building, two behaviors that are linked to the provisioning and oviposition process (POP). Remarkably, the majority of bees (59%) were never seen foraging and non-foragers were characterized by fewer trophallaxes and less grooming during their lifetime. Bees that did forage often specialized in collecting particular resources, e.g. pollen and mud collectors. In summary, our results suggest that the colony organization in M. marginata is complex and includes temporal castes, elitism across some tasks and specialization in others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ament SA, Corona M, Pollock HS, Robinson GE (2012) Insulin signaling is involved in the regulation of worker division of labor in honey bee colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:4226–4231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassindale R (1955) The biology of the stingless bee Trigona (Hypotrigona) gribodoi Magretti (Meliponidae). Proc Zool Soc Lond 125:49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Shahar Y, Robichon A, Sokolowski MB, Robinson GE (2002) Influence of gene action across different time scales on behavior. Science 296:741–744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 57:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:13–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante NCR (2006) Divisão de Trabalho em Três Espécies de Abelhas do Gênero Melipona (Hymenoptera, Apidae) na Amazônia, Brasileira. Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus

    Google Scholar 

  • Camargo JMF, Pedro SRM (2013) Meliponini Lepeletier, 1836. In: Moure JS, Urban D, Melo GAR (eds) Catalogue of bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) in the Neotropical Region—online version. http://www.moure.cria.org.br/catalogue. Accessed 30 May 2018

  • Cardoso-Júnior CAM, Silva RP, Borges NA, de Carvalho WJ, Walter SL, Simões ZLP, Bitondi MMG, Vieira CU, Bonetti AM, Hartfelder K (2017) Methyl farnesoate epoxidase (mfe) gene expression and juvenile hormone titers in the life cycle of a highly eusocial stingless bee, Melipona scutellaris. J Insect Physiol 191:185–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charbonneau D, Dornhaus A (2015) Workers ‘specialized’on inactivity: Behavioral consistency of inactive workers and their role in task allocation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1459–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charbonneau D, Sasaki T, Dornhaus A (2017) Who needs ‘lazy’ workers? Inactive workers act as a ‘reserve’ labor force replacing active workers, but inactive workers are not replaced when they are removed. PLoS One 12(9):e0184074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darchen R (1969) Sur la biologie de Trigona (Apotrigona) nebulata komiensis Cock. I Biol Gabon 5:151–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukas R, Visscher PK (1994) Lifetime learning by foraging honey-bees. Animal Behav 48:1007–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels W, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL (1990) Caste development, reproductive strategies, and control of fertility in honey bees and stingless bees. In: Engels W (ed) Social insects. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 167–230

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Farina WM, Grüter C (2009) Trophallaxis—a mechanism of information transfer. In: Jarau S, Hrncir M (eds) Food exploitation by social insects: ecological, behavioral, and theoretical approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannini KM (1997) Labor division in Melipona compressipes fasciculata Smith (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponinae). An Soc Entomol Bras 26:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Peat J, Stout JC, Tucker J, Darvill B, Derwent LC et al (2002) Can alloethism in workers of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, be explained in terms of foraging efficiency? Anim Behav 64:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosso AF, Bego LR (2002) Labor division, average life span, survival curve, and nest architecture of Tetragonisca angustula angustula (Hymenoptera, Apinae, Meliponini). Sociobiology 40:615–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Grüter C, Menezes C, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Ratnieks FLW (2012) A morphologically specialized soldier caste improves colony defence in a Neotropical eusocial bee. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:1182–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grüter C, Segers FHID, Menezes C, Vollet-Neto A, Falcon T, von Zuben L, Bitondi MMG, Nascimento FS, Almeida EAB (2017) Repeated evolution of soldier sub-castes suggests parasitism drives social complexity in stingless bees. Nat Commun 8:4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hammel B, Vollet-Neto A, Menezes C, Nascimento FS, Engels W, Grüter C (2016) Soldiers in a stingless bee: work rate and task repertoire suggest guards are an elite force. Am Nat 187:120–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW (2002) Task-partitioned nectar transfer in stingless bees: work organisation in a phylogenetic context. Ecol Entomol 27:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard TA (1999) The role of stingless bees in crop pollination. Annu Rev Entomol 44:183–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebling NJ, Kerr WE, Kerr F (1964) Divisão de trabalho entre operárias de Trigona (Scaptotrigona) xanthotricha Moure. Pap Avulsos Zool 16:115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Herb BR, Wolschin F, Hansen KD, Aryee MJ, Langmead B, Irizarry R, Amdam GV, Feinberg AP (2012) Reversible switching between epigenetic states in honeybee behavioral subcastes. Nat Neurosci 15:1371–1373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2009) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrncir M, Schmidt VM, Schorkopf DLP, Jarau S, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2006) Vibrating the food receivers: a direct way of signal transmission in stingless bees (Melipona seminigra). J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192:879–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd CR, Nordheim EV, Jeanne RL (2003) Elite workers and the colony-level pattern of labor division in the yellow jacket wasp, Vespula germanica. Behaviour 140:827–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imperatriz-Fonseca V, Zucchi R (1995) Virgin queens in stingless bee (Apidae, Meliponinae) colonies: a review. Apidologie 26:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue T, Salmah S, Sakagami SF (1996) Individual variations in worker polyethism of the Sumatran stingless bee, Trigona (Tetragonula) minangkabau (Apidae, Meliponinae). Jpn J Entomol 64:641–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandt JM, Dornhaus A (2009) Spatial organization and division of labour in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens. Anim Behav 77(3):641–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandt JM, Dornhaus A (2011) Competition and cooperation: bumblebee spatial organization and division of labor may affect worker reproduction late in life. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:2341–2349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR, Frost E (2012) Individual-level patterns of division of labor in honeybees highlight flexibility in colony-level development mechanisms. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:923–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justino CEL, Noll FB, Mateus S, Billen J (2018) Wax gland size according to worker age in Friesella schrottkyi. Apidologie 49:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr WE, Santos Neto dos GR (1956) Contribuição para o conhecimento da bionomia dos Meliponini. 5. Divisão de trabalho entre as operarias de Melipona quadrifasciata quadrifasciata. Insect Soc 3:423–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmes SA (1986) Have hymenopteran societies evolved to be ergonomically efficient? J N Y Entomol Soc 94:447–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Leoncini I, Le Conte Y, Costagliola G, Plettner E, Toth AL, Wang M, Huang Z, Bécard JM, Crauser D, Slessor KN, Robinson GE (2004) Regulation of behavioral maturation by a primer pheromone produced by adult worker honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17559–17564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer M (1952) Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie 34:299–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BF (1994) Multivariate statistical methods. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattila HR, Reeve HK, Smith ML (2012) Promiscuous honey bee queens increase colony productivity by suppressing worker selfishness. Curr Biol 22:2027–2031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medina LAM, Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW (2014) Waste management in the stingless bee Melipona beecheii Bennett (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology 61(4):435–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1990) Learning, memory, and “cognition” in honey bees. In: Kesner R, Olton DS (eds) Neurobiology of comparative cognition. Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp 237–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh F, Legendre P (2014) Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement ward’s criterion? J Classif 31:274–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinter-Wollman N, Hubler J, Holley J-A, Franks NR, Dornhaus A (2012) How is activity distributed among and within tasks in Temnothorax ants? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1407–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen C, Cameron S (2010) Global stingless bee phylogeny supports ancient divergence, vicariance, and long distance dispersal. Biol J Linn Soc 99:206–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Anderson C (1999) Task partitioning in insect societies. Insect Soc 46:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE (2002) Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in the honeybee colonies. Am Nat 160:S160–S172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robson SK, Traniello JFA (1999) Key individuals and the organisation of labor in ants. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects, Springer, Basel, pp 239–260

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW (2006) Stingless bee nesting biology. Apidologie 37:124–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami SF (1982) Stingless bees. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects III. Academic Press, New York, pp 361–423

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz DJ, Sullivan JP, Robinson GE (2002) Juvenile hormone and octopamine in the regulation of division of labor in honey bee colonies. Horm Behav 42:222–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segers FHID, Menezes C, Vollet-Neto A, Lambert D, Grüter C (2015) Soldier production in a stingless bee depends on rearing location and nurse behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:613–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segers FHID, Von Zuben LG, Grüter C (2016) Local differences in parasitism and competition shape defensive investment in a polymorphic eusocial bee. Ecology 97:417–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shorter JR, Tibbetts EA (2009) The effect of juvenile hormone on temporal polyethism in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus. Insect Soc 56:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommeijer MJ (1984) Distribution of labour among workers of Melipona favosa F.: age-polyethism and worker oviposition. Insect Soc 31:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan JP, Jassim O, Fahrbach SE, Robinson GE (2000) Juvenile hormone paces behavioral development in the adult worker honey bee. Horm Behav 37:1–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki R, Shimodaira H (2006) Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 22(12):1540–1542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tenczar P, Lutz C, Rao VD, Goldenfeld N, Robinson GE (2014) Automated monitoring reveals extreme interindividual variation in plasticity in honeybee foraging activity levels. Animal Behav 95:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) Doing the right thing: ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. Trends Ecol Evol 7:346–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. 4th edn, Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield CW, Ben-Shahar Y, Brillet C, Leoncini I, Crauser D, Le Conte Y, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Robinson GE (2006) Genomic dissection of behavioral maturation in the honey bee. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:16068–16075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wille A, Michener C (1973) The nest architecture of stingless bees with special reference to those of Costa. Rica Rev Biol Trop 21:9–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmi S, Bodenhaimer S, Bloch G (2006) Developmentally determined attenuation in circadian rhythms links chronobiology to social organization in bees. J Exp Biol 209:1044–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thanks Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto—USP, Departamento de Biologia, Prof. Dr. Ronaldo Zucchi and Ana Carolina Roselino for comments and suggestions on the project. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001 (scholarship to the second author). C.G. was funded by a Science without Borders fellowship from the Brazilian Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq (Process 400664/2012-7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Mateus.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mateus, S., Ferreira-Caliman, M.J., Menezes, C. et al. Beyond temporal-polyethism: division of labor in the eusocial bee Melipona marginata. Insect. Soc. 66, 317–328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-019-00691-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-019-00691-2

Keywords

Navigation