Working in the rain? Why leaf-cutting ants stop foraging when it’s raining
- 404 Downloads
Understanding how environmental factors modulate foraging is key to recognizing the adaptive value of animal behavior, especially in ectothermic organisms such as ants. We experimentally analyzed the effect of rain on the foraging of leaf-cutting ants, a key ant group that is commonly found in rainy habitats. Specifically, we experimentally discriminate among direct and indirect effects of rain on laden ants and explore whether ants respond to rain predictors by incrementing their speed. Watered loads were frequently dropped although ants were not wet, and watered ants also dropped their loads although loads were not wet. Watered leaf fragments increased their weight by 143% and were dropped independently with regards to area or symmetry. Watering the trail did not affect the proportion of ants that dropped their loads. Ants increased their speed by 30% after experimental increments in relative humidity and the noise of raindrops on leaves near the trail. Our experimental results confirm earlier anecdotic evidence of the negative effect of rainfall on the foraging of leaf-cutting ants. We demonstrate that rain can strongly limit ant foraging through different mechanisms, affecting both the ant itself, and the maneuverability of laden ants, by increasing the weight of their loads. We also depict behavioral responses that may mitigate this negative effect on foraging: walking faster at signals of rainfall to reduce the portion of leaf fragments lost. Our results illustrate how environmental factors can directly and indirectly constrain ant foraging and highlight the relevance of behavioral responses to mitigate these effects.
KeywordsAtta cephalotes Ant behavior Costa Rica Foraging Environmental restrictions
This work was partially supported by the Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, Argentina (FONCYT; PICT 2015-1319) and CONICET, Argentina (PIP 2014–2016, 11220130100665-CO) to AFGB. The Organization for Tropical Studies (OTS) provided logistical support. One anonymous reviewer, Martin Burd and G. Pizzarello provided helpful comments on the manuscript.
- Farji-Brener AG, Chinchilla F, Umaña M, Ocasio- Torres M, Chauta-Mellizo A, Acosta-Rojas D, Marinaro S, de Torres Curth M, Amador-Vargas S (2015) Branching angles reflect a tradeoff between reducing trail maintenance costs or travel distances in leaf-cutting ants. Ecology 96:510–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farji Brener AG, Ruggiero A (1994). Leaf-cutting ants (Atta and Acromyrmex) inhabiting Argentina: patterns in species richness and geographical ranges sizes. J Biogeogr 21:535–543Google Scholar
- Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2011) The leafcutter ants: civilization by instinct. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Krebs JR, Davies NB, Parr J (1993) An introduction to behavioral ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- McDade LM, Bawa KS, Hespenheide HA, Hartshorn GS (eds) (1994) La Selva: ecology and natural history of a Neotropical rain forest. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Mueller UG, Mikheyev AS, Hong E, Sen R, Warren DL, Solomon SE, Juenger TE. (2011) Evolution of cold-tolerant fungal symbionts permits winter fungiculture by leafcutter ants at the northern frontier of a tropical ant–fungus symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:4053–4056CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar