Skip to main content
Log in

Forced associations by young queens of the harvester ant Messor semirufus during colony founding

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After landing at the end of their nuptial flight, young queens of the harvester ant Messor semirufus search for a suitable nesting site and dig a burrow. After 3 months in the burrow, they start laying eggs, and nurse their first brood of workers alone. Field observations indicate that a few newly dug burrows contain more than one queen. Laboratory experiments were conducted in order to discover why these young queens’ associations form. We found that groups do not exhibit any productive advantage over single-founding queens, either with respect to progeny number, or with respect to the time until the first eggs are laid. Groups have a slower rate of nest digging than single queens, and mortality rate is considerably higher for queens in groups than for single queens. From the initiation of the group, queen interactions involve aggression and a behavioral hierarchy, with a prior-residence advantage. The tendency to form groups is stronger if queens density is greater and if digging conditions, characterized by soil hardness, are less favorable. We conclude that foundress associations in M. semirufus are in fact the result of nest invasions in an attempt to displace the resident queen. These are motivated by the high cost of the search for a suitable nesting site and of the digging of the nest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti A (1992) A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Stat Sci 7:131–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartz SH, Hӧlldobler B (1982) Colony founding in Myrmecocystus mimicus wheeler and the evolution of foundress associations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasconi G, Strassmann JE (1999) Cooperation among unrelated individuals: the ant foundress case. TREE 14:477–482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahan S, Helms KR, Rissing SW (1998) An abrupt transition in colony founding behaviour in the ant Messor pergandei. Anim Behav 55:1583–1594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahan S, Julian GE (1999) Fitness consequences of cooperative colony founding in the desert leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex versicolor. Behav Ecol 10:585–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark RM, Fewell JH (2014) Social dynamics drive selection in cooperative associations of ant queens. Behav Ecol 25:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms Cahan S, Fewell JH (2004) Division of labor and the evolution of task sharing in queen associations of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hӧlldobler B, Wilson EO (1977) The number of queens: an important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 64:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hӧlldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Fewell JH (2008) Influence of the social context on division of labor in ant foundress associations. Behav Ecol 19:567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA (2000) Water loss in desert ants: caste variation and the effect of cuticle abrasion. Physiol Entomol 25:48–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA (2004) Colony founding by pleometrosis in the semiclaustral seed-harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim Behav 68:1189–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann EL (1975) Nonparametrics: statistical methods based on ranks. Holden–Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1977) Parental investment: A prospective analysis. Anim Behav 25:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Parker GA (1977) The logic of asymmetric contests. Nature 24:159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzer A (1979) Colony foundation and pleometrosis in Camponotus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pan-Pac Entomol 55:81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzer A (1987) Primary polygyny in the ant Atta texana: number and weight of females and colony foundation success in the laboratory. Insectes Soc 34:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motro M, Motro U, Cohen D (2016) Decision making by young queens of the harvester ant Messor semirufus while searching for a suitable nesting site. Insectes Soc 63:615–622

  • Nonacs P (1992) Queen condition and alate density affect pleometrosis in the ant Lasius pallitarsis. Insectes Soc 39:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overson R, Gadau J, Clark RM, Pratt SC, Fewell JH (2014) Behavioral transitions with the evolution of cooperative nest founding by harvester ant queens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfenning DW (1995) Absence of joint nest advantage in desert seed harvester ants: evidence from a field experiment. Anim Behav 49:567–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber A, Meunier J, Chapuisat M (2010) Flexible colony-founding strategies in a socially polymorphic ant. Anim Behav 79:467–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW, Pollock GB (1986) Social interaction among pleometrotic queens of Veromessor pergandei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) during colony foundation. Anim Behav 34:226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW, Pollock GB (1987) Queen aggression, pleometrotic advantage and brood raiding in the ant Veromessor pergandei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim Behav 35:975–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz MP, Tierney SM, Rehan SM, Chenoweth LB, Cooper SJB (2011) The evolution of eusociality in allodapine bees: workers began by waiting. Biol Lett 7:277–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne B (1982) Multiple primary queens in termites: phyletic distribution, ecological context, and a comparison to polygyny in Hymenoptera. In: Breed MD, Michener CD, Evans HE (eds) The biology of social insects. Westview, Boulder, pp 206–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR (1993) Resource allocation, brood reduction and cannibalism during colony founding in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:209–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR (1998) An experimental study of pleometrotic colony founding in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta: what is the basis for association? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel WR, Howard DF (1983) Colony founding by pleometrosis in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Michael D. Breed, two anonymous reviewers, and the late Dr. Raja Szlep for important comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Motro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Motro, M., Motro, U. & Cohen, D. Forced associations by young queens of the harvester ant Messor semirufus during colony founding. Insect. Soc. 64, 179–187 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-017-0551-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-017-0551-1

Keywords

Navigation