Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 307–309 | Cite as

Stop signaling by foragers not encountering danger at a food source

Short Communication

Abstract

The stop signal is an acoustic negative feedback signal employed by honey bees that plays a key role in foraging regulation and group decision-making. In this study, foragers trained to visit a feeding station were either pinched on the hind femur by an observer in a simulation of a predator attack or left to forage uninhibited. Pinched bees were significantly less likely to perform the waggle dance, a recruitment signal, upon their return to their hive and also significantly more likely to perform the stop signal than bees that had not been pinched. Of note is the observation that approximately 70% of the stop signals recorded during the course of this experiment were performed by bees that had never visited the feeding station at all. This may have occurred because the bees interpreted the presence of a high-reward food source, the feeding station, as a honey-robbing situation. Alternatively, the stop signaling bees may have been unloader bees responsible for taking food from incoming foragers and storing it elsewhere in the hive. These unloader bees may have been overwhelmed by the influx of food from the feeding station and used the stop signal in an effort to modulate the colony’s foraging efforts.

Keywords

Behavior Decision-making Honey bee Negative feedback Recruitment 

References

  1. Johnson BR, Nieh JC (2010) Modeling the adaptive role of negative signaling in honey bee intraspecific competition. J Insect Behav 23:459–471CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Kietzman PM, Visscher PK (2015) The anti-waggle dance: use of the stop signal as negative feedback. Front Ecol Evol 3:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kirchner WH (1993) Vibrational signals in the tremble dance of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lau C, Nieh J (2010) Honey bee stop-signal production: temporal distribution and effect of feeder crowding. Apidologie 4:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Nieh JC (1993) The stop signal of honey bees: reconsidering its message. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nieh JC (2010) A negative feedback signal that is triggered by peril curbs honey bee recruitment. Curr Biol 20:310–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pastor KA, Seeley TD (2005) The brief piping signal of the honey bee: begging call or stop signal? Ethology 111:775–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Seeley TD (1992) The tremble dance of the honey bee: messages and meanings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Thom C, Gilley D, Tautz J (2003) Worker piping in honey bees (Apis mellifera): the behavior or piping nectar foragers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. von Frisch K (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Transl. by L. E. Chadwick. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. M. Kietzman
    • 1
    • 3
  • P. K. Visscher
    • 1
  • J. K. Lalor
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of California at RiversideRiversideUSA
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsUniversity of California at RiversideRiversideUSA
  3. 3.Department of EntomologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations