Sociometry is the description and analysis of the physical and numerical attributes of social insect colonies over their lifetimes. Sociometric data, such as worker number and nest size are essential for understanding how colonies develop but are rarely collected. Even Apis mellifera, the most intensively studied social insect, has never received a broad-scale sociometric study. To help fill this gap, we monitored four honey bee colonies living in large observation hives from when they began as swarms (July 2012), to when they died (January 2014). We tracked multiple colony parameters, including worker and drone populations, comb area and use, swarming rate, and colony death. Each colony’s life history is described through its founding, ergonomic, and reproductive stages.
Growth and development Tracking developmental changes Colony morphology Lifetime reproductive investment Social insects
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
We thank James Mendelssohn and Hailey Scofield for comments on the manuscript, and Ruth Ann Cecilia Smith for help with data management. Based on work supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1144153, to MLS) and by a Hatch Grant (NYC-191400, to TDS) from the Cornell University Agriculture Experiment Station.
Free JB, Racey PA (1968) The effect of the size of honeybee colonies on food consumption, brood rearing and the longevity of the bees during winter. Entomol Exp Appl 11:241–249. doi:10.1007/BF00305232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee PC, Winston ML (1985) The effect of swarm size and date of issue on comb construction in newly founded colonies of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Can J Zool 63:524–527. doi:10.1139/z85-077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNally LC, Schneider SS (1992) Seasonal cycles of growth, development and movement of the African honey bee, Apis mellifera scutellata, in Africa. Insectes Soc 39:167–179. doi:10.1007/BF01249292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell C (1970) Weights of workers and drones. Am Bee J 110:468–469Google Scholar
Pratt SC (1999) Optimal timing of comb construction by honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies: a dynamic programming model and experimental tests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:30–42. doi:10.1007/s002650050589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, TD (2007) Honey bees of the Arnot Forest: a population of feral colonies persisting with Varroa destructor in the northeastern United States. Apidologie 38(1):19–29. doi:10.1051/apido:2006055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley TD, Mikheyev AS (2003) Reproductive decisions by honey bee colonies: tuning investment in male production in relation to success in energy acquisition. Insectes Soc 50:134–138. doi:10.1007/s00040-003-0638-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr CK (2006) Steps toward a general theory of the colony cycle in social insects. In: Kipyatkov VE (ed) Life cycles Soc insects Behav Ecol Evol St. Petersburg University Press, Petersburg, pp 1–20Google Scholar
Tschinkel WR (1993) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta during one annual cycle. Ecol Soc Am 63:425–457. doi:10.2307/2937154Google Scholar
Tschinkel WR (1998) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: worker characteristics in relation to colony size and season. Insectes Soc 45:385–410. doi:10.1007/s000400050097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston ML (1980a) Seasonal patterns of brood rearing and worker longevity in colonies of the Africanized honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in South America. J Kansas Entomol Soc 53:157–165Google Scholar