Advertisement

Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 359–371 | Cite as

Research on urban ants: approaches and gaps

  • M. N. SantosEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

Several species of ants are common in cities and are therefore included in studies of urban ecology. Here, I describe and categorize some aspects of the available literature on urban ants to better understand what has been studied and what is known by mapping well-studied areas and important gaps. Through systematic review techniques, I identified 109 relevant studies in the literature, and most (37.96 % of the publications) investigated the ecology and biodiversity of these ants followed by studies that addressed invasive ants (30.56 %), the control of pest ants (19.44 %) and public health (pathogen vector ants) (12.04 %). The studies that addressed invasive ants and pest ant control tended to focus on exotic species and their ecology, and the most tested type of control was the use of chemical pesticides. The most frequently used species for these tests was Linepithema humile, which was also the most studied invasive species. I identified a scarcity of studies in highly urbanized cities in countries located in Eastern Europe, Africa, Asia, Central America and South America with the exception of Brazil. I suggest that those topics that have not been studied in the literature, such as the influence of air pollution on ant fauna and the explicit recommendations for the handling and conservation of native species in urban green areas, be placed on the agenda of the scientific community as points of concern.

Keywords

Hymenoptera Formicidae Urban ecosystem Urban ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Jarbas Marçal de Queiroz for his technical assistance in preparing this study and for helpful comments that improved this manuscript. This research was supported by the Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and by the Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Florestais, Instituto de Florestas, UFRRJ, Brazil. I also thank Margaret Jane Couvillon and the anonymous reviewers whose invaluable critical comments improved this manuscript.

Supplementary material

40_2016_483_MOESM1_ESM.doc (243 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 243 kb)

References

  1. Alder P, Silverman J (2005) Effects of interspecific competition between two urban ant species, Linepithema humile and Monomorium minimum, on toxic bait performance. J Econ Entomol 98:493–501. doi: 10.1093/jee/98.2.493 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Angilletta MJ Jr, Wilson RS, Niehaus AC, Sears MW, Navas CA, Ribeiro PL (2007) Urban physiology: city ants possess high heat tolerance. PLoS One 2:e258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000258 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonova V, Penev L (2008) Classification of ant assemblages in green areas of Sofia. Acta Zool Bulg Suppl 2:103–110Google Scholar
  4. Blight O, Orgeas J, Renucci M, Tirard A, Provost E (2009) Where and how Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) spreads in Corsica? C R Biol 332:747–751. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.04.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blight O, Orgeas J, Renucci M, Provost E (2011) Imidacloprid gel bait effective in Argentine ant control at nest scale. Sociobiology 58:23–30Google Scholar
  6. Bolger DT (2007) Spatial and temporal variation in the Argentine ant edge effect: implications for the mechanism of edge limitation. Biol Conserv 136:295–305. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brightwell RJ, Bambara SB, Silverman J (2010) Combined effect of hemipteran control and liquid bait on Argentine ant populations. J Econ Entomol 103:1790–1796. doi: 10.1603/EC10150 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Buczkowski G, Bennett GW (2006) Dispersed central-place foraging in the polydomous odorous house ant, Tapinoma sessile as revealed by a protein marker. Insect Soc 53:282–290. doi: 10.1007/s00040-006-0870-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buczkowski G, Richmond DS (2012) The effect of urbanization on ant abundance and diversity: a temporal examination of factors affecting biodiversity. PLoS One 7:e41729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041729 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Campos-Farinha A, Bueno OC, Campos MCG, Kato LM (2002) As formigas urbanas no Brasil: retrospecto. Biológico 64:129–133Google Scholar
  11. Cherry R (2001) Interrelationship of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and southern chinch bugs (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) in Florida lawns. J Entomol Sci 36:411–415Google Scholar
  12. Coelho-Marques AP, Ale-Rocha R, Rafael JA (2002) Levantamento de formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) em residencias de manaus, estado do Amazonas, Brazil. Acta Amazon 32:133–139. doi: 10.1590/1809-43922002321140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dáttilo W, Sibinel N, Falcão JCF, Nunes RV (2011) Ant fauna in a urban remnant of Atlantic forest in the municipality of Marília, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Biosci J 27:494–504Google Scholar
  14. Dearborn DC, Kark S (2010) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24:432–440. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01328.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Del Toro I, Floyd K, Gardea-Torresdey J, Borrok D (2010) Heavy metal distribution and bioaccumulation in Chihuahuan Desert rough harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex rugosus) populations. Environ Pollut 158:1281–1287. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.01.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Delabie JH, Paim VR, Do Nascimento IC, Campiolo S, Mariano Cdos S (2006) Ants as biological indicators of human impact in mangroves of the southeastern coast of Bahia, Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 35:602–615. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2006000500006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Espadaler X, López-Soria L (1991) Rareness of certain Mediterranean ant species: fact or artifact? Ins Soc 38:365–377. doi: 10.1007/BF01241872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fontana R, Wetler RM, Aquino RS, Andrioli JL, Queiroz GR, Ferreira SL, do Nascimento IC, Delabie JH (2010) Pathogenic bacteria dissemination by ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in two hospitals in northeast Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 39:655–663. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2010000400029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedrich R, Philpott SM (2009) Nest-site limitation and nesting resources of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in urban green spaces. Environ Entomol 38:600–607. doi: 10.1603/022.038.0311 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia FR, Ahlert CC, de Freitas BR, Trautmann MM, Tancredo SP, Lutinski JA (2011) Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in five hospitals of Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Acta Sci Health Sci 33:203–209. doi: 10.4025/actascihealthsci.v33i2.1099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. González-García A, Belliure J, Gómez-Sal A, Dávila P (2009) The role of urban greenspaces in fauna conservation: the case of the iguana Ctenosaura similis in the ‘patios’ of León city, Nicaragua. Biodivers Conserv 18:1909–1920. doi: 10.1007/s10531-008-9564-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760. doi: 10.1126/science.1150195 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gurevitch J, Hedges LV (1999) Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80(4):1142–1149. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1142:SIIEMA]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  24. Gusmão FA, Sibinel N, Campos A (2011) Control of tramp ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with methoprene baits. Sociobiology 57:329–339Google Scholar
  25. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holway DA, Suarez AV (2006) Homogenization of ant communities in Mediterranean California: the effects of urbanization and invasion. Biol Conserv 127:319–326. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ivanov K, Keiper J (2009) Effectiveness and biases of Winkler litter extraction and pitfall trapping for collecting ground-dwelling ants in northern temperate forests. Environ Entomol 38:1724–1736. doi: 10.1603/022.038.0626 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ives CD, Hose GC, Nipperess DA, Taylor MP (2011) The influence of riparian corridor width on ant and plant assemblages in northern Sydney, Australia. Urban Ecosyst 14:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11252-010-0141-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Iwata K, Eguchi K, Yamane S (2005) A case study on urban ant fauna of southern Kyusyu, Japan, with notes on a new monitoring protocol (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J Asia Pac Entomol 8:263–272. doi: 10.1016/S1226-8615(08)60244-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kamura CM, Morini MS, Figueiredo CJ, Bueno OC, Campos-Farinha AE (2007) Ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in an urban ecosystem near the Atlantic rainforest. Braz J Biol 67:635–641. doi: 10.1590/S1519-69842007000400007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Klotz JH, Greenberg L, Storey HH, Williams DF (1997a) Alternative control strategies for ants around homes. J Agri Entomol 14:249–257Google Scholar
  32. Klotz JH, Vail KM, Willams DF (1997b) Liquid boric acid bait for control of structural infestations of Pharaoh ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Econ Entomol 90:523–526. doi: 10.1093/jee/90.2.523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klotz JH, Rust MK, Greenberg L, Field HC, Kupfer K (2007) An evaluation of several urban pest management strategies to control Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 50:391–398Google Scholar
  34. Klotz JH, Rust MK, Greenberg L, Robertson MA (2010) Developing low risk management strategies for Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 55:779–785Google Scholar
  35. Koch F, Vohland K (2008) Ants along a southern African transect—a basis for biodiversity change monitoring (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Zool Reihe 80:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kondoh M (1978) A comparison among ant communities in the anthropogenic environment. Memorabilia Zool 29:79–92Google Scholar
  37. Leimu R, Koricheva J (2005) What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends Ecol Evol 20:28–32. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lessard J, Buddle CM (2005) The effects of urbanization on ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) associated with the Molson nature Reserve, Quebec. Can Entomol 137:215–225. doi: 10.4039/n04-055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. López-Moreno IR, Díaz-Betancourt ME, Landa TS (2003) Social insects in the arthropod environment: the ants from the city of Coatepec, Veracruz, Mexico. Sociobiology 42:605–621Google Scholar
  40. Lowry DE, Rollinson E, Laybourn A, Scott T, Aiello-Lammens M, Gray S, Mickley J, Gurevitch J (2013) Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review and database of the literature. Ecol Evol 3:182–196. doi: 10.1002/ece3.431 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Marshall E, Shortle JS (2005) Urban development impacts on ecosystems. In: Goetz SJ, Shortle JS, Bergstrom JC (eds) Land use problems and conflicts: causes, consequences and solutions. Routledge, London, pp 79–93Google Scholar
  42. McIntyre NE, Knowles-Yánez K, Hope D (2000) Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences. Urban Ecosyst 4:5–24. doi: 10.1023/A:1009540018553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Menke SB, Guénard B, Sexton JO, Weiser MD, Dunn RR, Silverman J (2011) Urban areas may serve as habitat and corridors for dry-adapted, heat tolerant species; an example from ants. Urban Ecosyst 14:135–163. doi: 10.1007/s11252-010-0150-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meyers JM, Gold R (2008) Identification of an exotic pest ant, Paratrechina sp. nr. pubens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Texas. Sociobiology 52:589–604Google Scholar
  45. Mitrovich MJ, Matsuda T, Pease KH, Fisher RN (2010) Ants as a measure of effectiveness of habitat conservation planning in Southern California. Conserv Biol 24:1239–1248. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01486.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Moreira D, Morais VD, Vieira-da-Motta O, Campos-Farinha AE, Tonhasca A Jr (2005) Ants as carriers of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in hospitals. Neotrop Entomol 34:999–1006. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2005000600017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Munhae CB, Bueno ZAFN, Morini MSC, Silva RR (2009) Composition of the ant fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in public squares in Southern Brazil. Sociobiology 53:455–472Google Scholar
  48. Niemelä J (1999) Is there a need for a theory of urban ecology? Urban Ecosyst 1:57–65. doi: 10.1023/A:1009595932440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nishisue K, Sunamura E, Tanaka Y, Sakamoto H, Suzuki S, Fukumoto T, Terayama M, Tatsuki S (2010) Long-term field trial to control the invasive Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with synthetic trail pheromone. J Econ Entomol 103:1784–1789. doi: 10.1603/EC10008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Oi DH, Vail KM, Williams DF, Bieman DN (1994) Indoor and outdoor foraging locations of Pharaoh ants (Hymenoptera-Formicidae) and control strategies using bait stations. Fla. Entomol 77:85–91. doi: 10.2307/3495874 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oi DH, Vail KM, Williams DF (1996) Field evaluation of perimeter treatments for Pharaoh ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) control. Fla Entomol 79:252–263. doi: 10.2307/3495822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pacheco R, Vasconcelos HL (2007) Invertebrate conservation in urban areas: ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Landsc Urban Plan 81:193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pamilo P, Zhu D, Fortelius W, Rosengren R, Seppä P, Sundström L (2005) Genetic patchwork of network-building wood ant populations. Ann Zool Fenn 42:179–187Google Scholar
  54. Pećarević M, Danoff-Burg J, Dunn RR (2010) Biodiversity on Broadway-enigmatic diversity of the societies of ants (Formicidae) on the streets of New York City. PLoS One 5:e13222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013222 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Pereira Rdos S, Ueno M (2008) Ants as carriers of microorganisms in hospital environments. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 41:492–495. doi: 10.1590/S0037-86822008000500011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Pesquero MA, Elias Filho J, Carneiro LC, Feitosa SB, Oliveira MA, Quintana RC (2008) Ants in a hospital environment and its importance as vector of bacteria. Neotrop Entomol 37:472–477. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2008000400017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Piva A, Campos AE (2012) Ant community structure (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in two neighborhoods with different urban profiles in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Psyche (Camb Mass) 2012:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2012/390748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Protection E (2003) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). site: http://www.thecre.com/quality/spring2003/epa.pdf
  59. Putiatina TS (2011) Effect of recreational pressure on ant communities of open biocenoses in Moscow. Moscow Univ Biol Sci Bull 66:42–45. doi: 10.3103/S0096392511010081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rey S, Espadaler X (2004) Area-wide management of the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Northeast Spain. J Agric Urban Entomol 21:99–112Google Scholar
  61. Ribeiro FM, Sibinel N, Ciocheti G, Campos A (2012) Analysis of ant communities comparing two methods for sampling ants in an urban park in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Sociobiology 59:971–984Google Scholar
  62. Rodovalho CM, Santos AL, Marcolino MT, Bonetti AM, Brandeburgo MA (2007) Urban ants and transportation of nosocomial bacteria. Neotrop Entomol 36:454–458. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2007000300014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rodrigues A, Solis DR, Fox EGP, Pagnocca FC, Bueno OC (2010) Preliminary list of microfungi found in Paratrechina longicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Fla Entomol 93:651–653. doi: 10.1653/024.093.0429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rowles AD, O’Dowd DJ (2009) Impacts of the invasive Argentine ant on native ants and other invertebrates in coastal scrub in south-eastern Australia. Austral Ecol 34:239–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01922.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Samways MJ, Osborn R, Carliel F (1997) Effect of a highway on ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) species composition and abundance, with a recommendation for roadside verge width. Biodivers Conserv 6:903–913. doi: 10.1023/A:1018355328197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sanford MP, Manley PN, Murphy DD (2009) Effects of urban development on ant communities: implications for ecosystem services and management. Conserv Biol 23:131–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01040.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Santos PF, Da Silva A, Sanches NM (2009) Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as vectors for bacteria in two hospitals in the municipality of Divinópolis, state of Minas Gerais. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 42:565–569. doi: 10.1590/S0037-86822009000500016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Savitha S, Barve N, Davidar P (2008) Response of ants to disturbance gradients in and around Bangalore, India. Trop Ecol 49:235–243Google Scholar
  69. Schultz R, Busch T (2009) The northernmost record of the invasive garden ant, Lasius neglectus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 12:183–186Google Scholar
  70. Silva TF, Solis DR, Moretti TC, Da-Silva AC, Habib ME (2009) House-infesting ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a municipality of southeastern Brazil. Sociobiology 54:153–159Google Scholar
  71. Silva GM, Carmo MSD, Moraes LS, Moraes FC, Barnabé AS, Figueiredo PDMS (2012) Formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Como vectorses de bactérias em ambiente hospitalar na cidade de São Luis-Maranhão. Rev Biol Trop 41:348–355. doi: 10.5216/rpt.v41i3.20750 Google Scholar
  72. Ślipiński P, Zmihorski M, Czechowski W (2012) Species diversity and nestedness of ant assemblages in an urban environment. Eur J Entomol 109:197–206. doi: 10.14411/eje.2012.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Soares NS, Almeida LD, Gonçalves CA, Marcolino MT, Bonetti AM (2006) Survey of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the urban area of Uberlândia, MG, Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 35:324–328. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2006000300005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Souza DR, Dos Santos SG, De Munhae CB, De Morini MSC (2012) Diversity of epigeal ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in urban areas of alto Tietê. Sociobiology 59:703–717Google Scholar
  75. Spiegel MR (1976) Análise de Fourier. McGraw-Hill, São Paulo, Coleção Schaum Alfredo Alves de FariasGoogle Scholar
  76. Stanley M, Ward D, Harris R, Arnold G, Toft R, Rees J (2008) Optimizing pitfall sampling for the detection of Argentine ants, Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 51:461–472Google Scholar
  77. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Osterlind SJ (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Needham HeightsGoogle Scholar
  78. Terradas J (2001) Ecología Urbana. Rubes editorial, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  79. Underwood EC, Fisher BL (2006) The role of ants in conservation monitoring: if, when, and how. Biol Conserv 132:166–182. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vail KM, Williams DF, Oi DH (1996) Perimeter treatments with two bait formulations of pyriproxyfen for control of Pharaoh ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Econ Entomol 89:1501–1507. doi: 10.1093/jee/89.6.1501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vega SY, Rust MK (2003) Determining the foraging range and origin of resurgence after treatment of Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in urban areas. J Econ Entomol 96:844–849. doi: 10.1093/jee/96.3.844 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Vepsäläinen K, Ikonen H, Koivula MJ (2008) The structure of ant assemblages in an urban area of Helsinki, southern Finland. Ann Zool Fennici 45:109–127. doi: 10.5735/086.045.0203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Walters AC (2006) Invasion of Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in South Australia: impacts on community composition and abundance of invertebrates in urban parklands. Austral Ecol 31:567–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2006.01592.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ward DF, Harris RJ (2005) Invasibility of native habitats by Argentine ants, Linepithema humile, in New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 29:215–219Google Scholar
  85. Wetterer JK, Dutra DS (2011) Ants on sapling cecropia in forest and urban areas of Trinidad (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 58:17–22Google Scholar
  86. Wetterer JK, Espadaler X, Wetterer AL, Cabral SGM (2004) Native and exotic ants of the Azores (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 44:1–20Google Scholar
  87. Yamaguchi T (2004) Influence of urbanization on ant distribution in parks of Tokyo and Chiba City, Japan I. Analysis of ant species richness. Ecol Res 19:209–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00625.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yamaguchi T (2005) Influence of urbanization on ant distribution in parks of Tokyo and Chiba City, Japan II. Analysis of species. Entomol Sci 8:17–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8298.2005.00096.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zarzuela MFM, Campos-Farinha A, Peçanha MP (2004) Evaluation of urban ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as carriers of pathogens in residential and industrial environments: I. Bacteria. Sociobiology 44:9–14Google Scholar
  90. Zettler JA, Collier A, Leidersdorf B, Sanou M (2010) Plants in your ants: using ant mounds to test basic ecological principles. Am Biol Teach 72:172–175. doi: 10.1525/abt.2010.72.3.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV (2010) Responses of terrestrial arthropods to air pollution: a meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:297–311. doi: 10.1007/s11356-009-0138-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratório de FitossanidadeInstituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, IPJBRJRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Florestais, Instituto de Florestas, UFRRJSeropédicaBrazil

Personalised recommendations