Colony size is an incredibly important factor in social insect ecology: it affects everything from foraging strategies to colony defense to mating systems to the degree of polymorphism. However, colony sizes vary dramatically among ant species (Formicidae): sizes range from several workers living together to super-colonies that stretch for hundreds of kilometers. Although the origins of eusociality and colonial life have been extensively theorized, little work has been done describing the evolution of colony size that followed after. Our study provides the first large-scale investigation into such issues, incorporating colony size data from 118 genera and recently published, nearly complete genus-level molecular phylogenies. We find that colony size change exhibits a bifurcation pattern similar to the feedback loop theory posited by Bourke 1999. Once colony sizes become sufficiently large, they rarely undergo radical decreases in size on a macroevolutionary scale. Additionally, the magnitude of colony size changes seem relatively small: rarely do colony sizes jump from small to large sizes without first transitioning through an intermediate size. Lastly, we echo many previous authors in advocating for the release of unpublished sociometric data and a push toward its further acquisition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abbot P, Abe J, Alcock J et al (2011) Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature 471:E1–E4. doi:10.1038/nature09831
Anderson C, McShea DW (2001) Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 76:S1464793101005656. doi:10.1017/S1464793101005656
Beckers R, Goss S, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1989) Colony Size, communication and ant foraging strategy. Psyche A J Entomol 96:239–256. doi:10.1155/1989/94279
Bolton B (2013) An online catalog of the ants of the world. http://antcat.org. Accessed 1 Jan 2013
Bonner JT (1988) The evolution of complexity by means of natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Bourke AFG (1999) Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. J Evolut Biol 12:245–257. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00028.x
Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Brady SG, Schultz TR, Fisher BL, Ward PS (2006) Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:18172–18177. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605858103
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644
Crozier RH, Pamilo P (1996) Evolution of social insect colonies: sex allocation and kin selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
de Vos JM, Hughes CE, Schneeweiss GM et al (2014) Heterostyly accelerates diversification via reduced extinction in primroses. Proc Biol Sci 281:20140075. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0075
Dew RM, Rehan SM, Tierney SM et al (2012) A single origin of large colony size in allodapine bees suggests a threshold event among 50 million years of evolutionary tinkering. Insectes Soc 59:207–214. doi:10.1007/s00040-011-0206-6
Dornhaus A, Powell S, Bengston S (2012) Group size and its effects on collective organization. Annu Rev Entomol 57:123–141. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100604
FitzJohn RG (2012) Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R. Methods Ecol Evol 3:1084–1092. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00234.x
FitzJohn RG, Maddison WP, Otto SP (2009) Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. Syst Biol 58:595–611. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp067
Gautrais J, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J-L, Anderson C (2002) Emergent polyethism as a consequence of increased colony size in insect societies. J Theor Biol 215:363–373. doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2506
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hou C, Kaspari M, Vander Zanden HB, Gillooly JF (2010) Energetic basis of colonial living in social insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:3634–3638. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908071107
Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320:1213–1216. doi:10.1126/science.1156108
Kao AB, Couzin ID (2014) Decision accuracy in complex environments is often maximized by small group sizes. Proc Biol Sci 281:20133305. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.3305
Kaspari M, Vargo EL (1995) Colony size as a buffer against seasonality: Bergmann’s rule in social insects. Am Nat 145:610. doi:10.1086/285758
Koh LP, Sodhi NS, Brook BW (2004) Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in tropical butterflies. Conserv Biol 18:1571–1578. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00468.x
Kramer BH, Schaible R (2013) Colony size explains the lifespan differences between queens and workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. Biol J Linn Soc 109:710–724. doi:10.1111/bij.12072
Laskis KO, Tschinkel WR (2009) The seasonal natural history of the ant, Dolichoderus mariaes, in northern Florida. J Insect Sci 9:1–26. doi:10.1673/031.009.0201
Lucky A, Trautwein MD, Guénard BS et al (2013) Tracing the rise of ants-out of the ground. PLoS ONE 8:e84012. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084012
Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2011) Mesquite 2.75: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. http://www.mesquiteproject.org
Maliska ME, Pennell MW, Swalla BJ (2013) Developmental mode influences diversification in ascidians. Biol Lett 9:20130068. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0068
Moreau CS, Bell CD (2013) Testing the museum versus cradle tropical biological diversity hypothesis: phylogeny, diversification, and ancestral biogeographic range evolution of the ants. Evolution (N Y) 67:2240–2257. doi:10.1111/evo.12105
Moreau CS, Bell CD, Vila R et al (2006) Phylogeny of the ants: diversification in the age of angiosperms. Science 312:101–104. doi:10.1126/science.1124891
Nowak MA, Tarnita CE, Wilson EO (2010) The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466:1057–1062. doi:10.1038/nature09205
Oliver TH, Leather SR, Cook JM (2008) Macroevolutionary patterns in the origin of mutualisms involving ants. J Evolut Biol 21:1597–1608. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01600.x
Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Sasaki T, Granovskiy B, Mann RP et al (2013) Ant colonies outperform individuals when a sensory discrimination task is difficult but not when it is easy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:13769–13773. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304917110
Schmidt C (2013) Molecular phylogenetics of ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Zootaxa 3647:201–250. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3647.2.1
R Core Development Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Tschinkel WR (1991) Insect sociometry, a field in search of data. Insectes Soc 38:77–82. doi:10.1007/BF01242715
Tukey JW, McLaughlin DH (1963) Less vulnerable confidence and significance procedures for location based on a single sample: trimming/winsorization 1. Indian J Stat 25:331–352
van Wilgenburg E, Torres CW, Tsutsui ND (2010) The global expansion of a single ant supercolony. Evolut Appl 3:136–143. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00114.x
Ward PS, Brady SG, Fisher BL, Schultz TR (2015) The evolution of myrmicine ants: phylogeny and biogeography of a hyperdiverse ant clade (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst Entomol 40:61–81. doi:10.1111/syen.12090
Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Wilson EO (2008) One giant leap: how insects achieved altruism and colonial life. Bioscience 58:17–25. doi:10.1641/B580106
We thank Benjamin E. R. Rubin and Max E. Winston for helpful discussions to improve this manuscript. We thank Michael LaBarbera and Marcus Kronforst for reading earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank two anonymous reviewers who helped improve this manuscript. We thank the National Science Foundation Research Experience for Undergraduates (NSF REU) program for support of A.T.B. during the summer of 2013. We also thank the National Science Foundation (DEB-1050243, DEB-1442316, and IOS-1354193) and an anonymous donor for support of C.S.M.
About this article
Cite this article
Burchill, A.T., Moreau, C.S. Colony size evolution in ants: macroevolutionary trends. Insect. Soc. 63, 291–298 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0465-3
- Comparative methods
- Colony size
- Group size