Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 265–270 | Cite as

A comparative analysis of rapid antennation behavior in four species of Odontomachus trap-jaw ants

Research Article

Abstract

The exchange of rapid antennal strikes between individuals is a behavior exhibited by many social hymenopterans, largely in dominance contexts within the nest and in aggressive contexts towards non-nestmates. Despite being widely reported, the behavior itself has not been well described or compared between species for the majority of social insect groups. We first document how often rapid antennation is used as an aggressive response to non-nestmates for four species of Odontomachus ants. We then use high-speed videography to measure the rate of rapid antennation behavior for these species. We find that rates are neither conserved nor species-specific and average between 19.5 and 41.5 strikes/s. Next, with O. brunneus, we compare this behavior as it is performed between nestmates and non-nestmates. We find no context-specific differences in rate, bout length, or number of strikes. We conclude by discussing the evolution of this behavior and its potential utility as a model for understanding aggressive behaviors both inside and outside of the nest.

Keywords

Antennal dueling Antennal boxing Antennal drumming Dominance Aggression 

Supplementary material

Supplemental Video. Rapid antennation behavior at full speed and 1/8 speed between non-nestmates (O. brunneus). (MP4 11742 kb)

References

  1. Balas MT, Adams ES (1996) Nestmate discrimination and competition in incipient colonies of fire ants. Anim Behav 51:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonavita-Cougourdan A, Morel L (1984) Les activities antennaires as cours des contacts traphallactiques chez la fourmi Camponotus vagus scop. Ont-elles valeur de signal? Insectes Soc 31:113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuvillier-Hot V, Lenoir A, Crewe R, Malosse C, Peeters C (2004) Fertility signalling and reproductive skew in queenless ants. Anim Behav 68:1209–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ehmer B, Gronenberg W (1997) Antennal muscles and fast antennal movements in ants. J Comp Physiol B 167:287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Emlen DJ (2014) Animal weapons: the evolution of battle. Henry Holt and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Ettershank G, Ettershank JA (1982) Ritualized fighting in the meat ant Iridomyrmex purpureus (Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Aust Entomol Soc 21:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franks NR, Scovell E (1983) Dominance and reproductive success among slave-making worker ants. Nature 304:724–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gobin B, Billen J, Peeters C (2001) Dominance interactions regulate worker mating in the polygynous ponerine ant Gnamptogenys menadensis. Ethology 107:495–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goyret J, Farina WM (2003) Descriptive study of antennation during trophallactic unloading contacts in honeybees Apis mellifera carnica. Insectes Soc 50:274–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinze J, Hölldobler B, Peeters C (1994) Conflict and cooperation in ant societies. Naturwissenschaften 81:489–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heinze J, Puchinger W, Hölldobler B (1997) Worker reproduction and social hierarchies in Leptothorax ants. Anim Behav 54:849–864CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hölldobler B, Carlin NF (1985) Colony founding, queen dominance and oligogyny in the australian meat ant Iridomyrmex purpureus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:45–58Google Scholar
  13. Hunt J, Richard F-J (2013) Intracolony vibroacoustic communication in social insects. Insectes Soc 60:403–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeanne RL (2009) Vibrational signals in social wasps: a role in caste determination? In: Gadau J, Fewell J (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeanne RL, Suryanarayanan S (2011) A new model for caste development in social wasps. Commun Integr Biol 4:373–377CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Lachaud JP, Dejean A (1991) Food sharing in Odontomachus troglodytes (Santschi): a behavioral intermediate stage in the evolution of social food exchange in ants. An Biol 17:53–61Google Scholar
  17. Lenoir A (1982) An informational analysis of antennal communication during trophallaxis in the ant Myrmica rubra L. Behav Process 7:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lommelen E, Wenseleers T, Johnson C, Drijfhout FP, Billen J, Gobin B (2010) A combination of fertility signals and aggression regulates reproduction in the ant Gnamptogenys striatula. J Insect Behav 23:236–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Macgown JA, Boudinot B, Deyrup M, Sorger DM (2014) A review of the Nearctic Odontomachus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) with a treatment of the males. Zootaxa 3802:515–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Medeiros FLN, Lopes NP, Moutinho PRS, Oliveira PS, Hölldobler B (1992) Functional polygyny, agonistic interactions and reproductive dominance in the neotropical ant Odontomachus chelifer (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ponerinae). Ethology 91:134–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Monnin T, Peeters C (1999) Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. Behav Ecol 10:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Montagner H, Pain J (1971) Étude préliminaire des communications entre ouvrières d’abeilles au cours de la trophallaxie. Insectes Soc 18:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliveira PS, Hölldobler B (1989) Orientation and communication in the neotropical ant Odontomachus bauri Emery (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ponerinae). Ethology 83:154–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oliveira PS, Hölldobler B (1990) Dominance orders in the ponerine ant Pachycondyla apicalis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Penick CA, Brent CS, Dolezal K, Liebig J (2014) Neurohormonal changes associated with ritualized combat and the formation of a reproductive hierarchy in the ant Harpegnathos saltator. J Exp Biol 217:1496–1503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Powell S, Tschinkel WR (1999) Ritualized conflict in Odontomachus brunneus and the generation of interaction-based task allocation: a new organizational mechanism in ants. Anim Behav 58:965–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pratte M, Jeanne RL (1984) Antennal drumming behavior in Polistes wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Z Tierpsychol 66:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ratnieks FLW, Foster KR, Wenseleers T (2006) Conflict resolution in insect societies. Ann Rev Entomol 51:581–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schmidt CA (2009) Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomic revision of ponerine ants. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith AA, Millar JG, Hanks LM, Suarez AV (2012) Experimental evidence that workers recognize reproductives through cuticular hydrocarbons in the ant Odontomachus brunneus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1267–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith AA, Millar JG, Hanks LM, Suarez AV (2013) A conserved fertility signal despite population variation in the cuticular chemical profile of the trap-jaw ant Odontomachus brunneus. J Exp Biol 216:3917–3924CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sommer K, Hölldobler B, Jessen K (1994) The unusual social organization of the ant Pachycondyla tridentata (Formicidae, Ponerinae). J Ethol 12:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spagna JC, Vakis AI, Patek SN, Zhang X, Suarez AV (2008) Multifunctionality, scaling, and the generation of extreme forces in trap-jaw ants. J Exp Biol 211:2358–2368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stroeymeyt N, Brunner E, Heinze J (2007) “Selfish worker policing” controls reproduction in a Temnothorax ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1449–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Suryanarayanan S, Jeanne RL (2008) Antennal drumming, trophallaxis, and colony development in the social wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ethology 114:1201–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suryanarayanan S, Hantschel AE, Torres CG, Jeanne RL (2011a) Changes in the temporal pattern of antennal drumming behavior across the Polistes fuscatus colony cycle (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insectes Soc 58:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suryanarayanan S, Hermanson JC, Jeanne RL (2011b) A mechanical signal biases caste development in a social wasp. Curr Biol 21:231–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. van Walsum E, Gobin B, Ito F, Billen J (1998) Worker reproduction in the ponerine ant Odontomachus simillimus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 32:427–440Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Integrative BiologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Animal BiologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  3. 3.North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences and North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations