Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 349–352 | Cite as

Winner–loser effects in a eusocial wasp

  • A. BangEmail author
  • R. Gadagkar
Short Communication


What makes some individuals behaviorally more dominant than others? Although intrinsic factors such as body size and age have been well studied, extrinsic social factors like winner and loser effects have never before been addressed in eusocial species. Here we demonstrated the existence of both winner and loser effects in the primitively eusocial wasp, Ropalidia marginata. Such relative self-assessment and adjustment of fighting abilities may have significant implications for survival and fitness, and could be adaptive, especially in a social species where dominance encounters with conspecifics is the norm.


Dominance behavior Eusocial Loser effect Ropalidia marginata Winner effect 



AB and RG designed the experiments, AB performed the experiments and data analysis and AB and RG co-wrote the paper. We thank Shilpa MC and Sruthi Unnikrishnan for assistance in the laboratory, and Anjan Nandi for helpful discussions. This work was supported by a fellowship to AB from the Indian Institute of Science, and by grants to RG from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; Department of Science and Technology; Department of Biotechnology; and Ministry of Environment and Forests (Govt. of India).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Bang A (2010) Determinants of behavioural and reproductive dominance in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  2. Bégin J, Beaugrand JP, Zayan R (1996) Selecting dominants and subordinates at conflict outcome can confound the effects of prior dominance or subordination experience. Behav Process 36:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gadagkar R (2001) The social biology of Ropalidia marginata: toward understanding the evolution of eusociality. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL (2006) Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 81:33–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Landau HG (1951a) On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics. Bull Math Biophys 13:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Landau HG (1951b) On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: II. Some effects of possible social factors. Bull Math Biophys 13:245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mesterton-Gibbons M (1999) On the evolution of pure winner and loser effects: a game-theoretic model. Bull Math Biol 61:1151–1186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof MWG (2006) What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends Ecol Evol 21:16–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shukla S, Pareek V, Gadagkar R (2014) Ovarian development in a primitively eusocial wasp: social interactions affect behaviorally dominant and subordinate wasps in opposite directions relative to solitary females. Behav Process 106:22–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. van Doorn GS, Hengeveld GM, Weissing FJ (2003) The evolution of social dominance II: multi-player models. Behaviour 140:1333–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Venkataraman AB, Swarnalatha VB, Nair P, Gadagkar R (1988) The mechanism of nestmate discrimination in the tropical social wasp Ropalidia marginata and its implications for the evolution of sociality. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ecological SciencesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Alternative Agriculture Resource CentreChetana-VikasWardhaIndia

Personalised recommendations