Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 169–174 | Cite as

Honey bee colonies regulate queen reproductive traits by controlling which queens survive to adulthood

  • D. R. TarpyEmail author
  • M. Simone-Finstrom
  • T. A. Linksvayer
Research Article


The production of new queens in honey bee colonies is one of the most important determinants of reproductive success, and it involves cooperative behavior among hundreds or thousands of workers. Colony members are generally expected to benefit by optimizing the reproductive traits of prospective replacement queens, but potential conflicts of interest among colony members could result in suboptimal queens. We studied the degree to which colonies regulate adult queen traits by controlling access to developing queens that survived from pupation to adulthood. We also searched for evidence of strong conflict among patrilines by comparing the contribution of patrilines to new queens and new workers, although we found no evidence for the existence of significantly queen-biased patrilines or for any association between patriline contribution to new queens and queen traits. However, adult queens emerging from cells accessible to workers were larger in terms of compared to adult queens emerging from cells that were not accessible to workers. These results suggest that colonies regulate queen quality traits by curtailing low-quality queens from fully developing, which is further evidence that cooperation predominates over potential conflict within honey bee colonies.


Social physiology Colony-level selection Royal cheats Queen reproductive potential 



Shiquita Toney assisted with the fieldwork and data collection, and Joel Caren helped with genotyping the workers and queens. This material is based on work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Award Number 2014-67013-21725, as well as to DRT by the NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.


  1. Allen MD (1956) The behavior of honeybees preparing to swarm. Br J Anim Behav 4:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brouwers EVM, Ebert R, Beetsma J (1987) Behavioral and physiological aspects of nurse bees in relation to the composition of larval food during caste differentiation in the honeybee. J Apic Res 26:11–23Google Scholar
  3. Châline N, Arnold G, Papin C, Ratnieks FLW (2003) Patriline differences in emergency queen rearing in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Insect Soc 50:234–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dedej S, Hartfelder K, Aumeier P, Rosenkranz P, Engels W (1998) Caste determination is a sequential process: effect of larval age at grafting on ovariole number, hind leg size and cephalic volatiles in the honey bee (Apis mellifera carnica). J Apic Res 37:183–190Google Scholar
  5. DeGrandi-Hoffman G, Spivak M, Martin JH (1993) Role of thermoregulation by nestmates on the development time of honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) queens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 86:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delaney DA, Keller JJ, Caren JR, Tarpy DR (2011) The physical, insemination, and reproductive quality of honey bee queens (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 42:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobata S, Sasaki T, Mori H, Hasegawa E, Shimada M, Tsuji K (2009) Cheater genotypes in the parthenogenetic ant Pristomyrmex punctatus. Proc R Soc B 276:567–574PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans JD, Wheeler DE (1999) Differential gene expression between developing queens and workers in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5575–5580PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans JD, Schwarz RS, Chen YP, Budge G, Cornman RS, De La Rua P, De Miranda JR, Foret S, Foster L, Gauthier L, Genersch E, Gisder S, Jarosch A, Kucharski R, Lopez D, Lun CM, Moritz RFA, Maleszka R, Muñoz I, Pinto MA (2013) Standard methodologies for molecular research in Apis mellifera. In: Dietemann V, Ellis JD, Neumann P (eds) The COLOSS BEEBOOK, Volume I: standard methods for Apis mellifera research Journal of Apicultural Research 52(4). doi: 10.3896/IBRA.
  10. Fell RD, Morse RA (1984) Emergency queen cell production in the honey bee colony. Insect Soc 31:221–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer F, Maul V (1991) Untersuchungen zu aufzuchtbedingten königinnenmerkmalen. (An inquiry into the characteristics of queens depending on queen rearing). Apidologie 22:444–446Google Scholar
  12. Fletcher DJC (1978) Vibration of queen cells by worker honeybees and its relation to the issue of swarms with virgin queens. J Apic Res 17:14–26Google Scholar
  13. Gary NE, Morse RA (1962) The events following queen cell construction in honeybee colonies. J Apic Res 1:3–5Google Scholar
  14. Gilley DC, Tarpy DR, Land BB (2003) The effect of queen quality on the interactions of workers and dueling queen honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:190–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hatch S, Tarpy DR, Fletcher DJC (1999) Worker regulation of emergency queen rearing in honey bee colonies and the resultant variation in queen quality. Insect Soc 46:372–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haydak MH (1970) Honey bee nutrition. Ann Rev Entomol 15:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes WHO, Boomsma JJ (2008) Genetic royal cheats in leaf-cutting ant societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5150–5153PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linksvayer TA, Kaftanoglu O, Akyol E, Blatch S, Amdam GV, Page RE Jr (2011) Larval and nurse worker control of developmental plasticity and the evolution of honey bee queen-worker dimorphism. J Evol Biol 24:1939–1948PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Melathopoulos AP, Winston ML, Pettis JS, Pankiw T (1996) Effect of queen mandibular pheromone on initiation and maintenance of queen cells in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Can Entomol 128:263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nielsen R, Tarpy DR, Reeve HK (2003) Estimating effective paternity number in social insects and the effective number of alleles in a population. Mol Ecol 12:3157–3164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nijhout HF (2003) Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms. Evol Dev 5:9–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Osborne KE, Oldroyd BP (1999) Possible causes of reproductive dominance during emergency queen rearing by honeybees. Anim Behav 58:267–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rangel J, Keller JJ, Tarpy DR (2013) The effects of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen reproductive potential on colony growth. Insect Soc 60:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schneider SS, DeGrandi-Hoffman G (2002) The influence of worker behavior and paternity on the development and emergence of honey bee queens. Insect Soc 49:306–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tarpy DR, Keller JJ, Caren JR, Delaney DA (2011) Experimentally induced variation in the physical reproductive potential and mating success in honey bee queens. Insect Soc 58:569–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tilley CA, Oldroyd BP (1997) Unequal subfamily proportions among honey bee queen and worker brood. Anim Behav 54:1483–1490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tofilski A, Czekonska K (2004) Emergency queen rearing in honeybee colonies with brood of known age. Apidologie 35:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Dyken JD, Linksvayer TA, Wade MJ (2011) Kin selection-mutation balance: a model for the origin, maintenance, and consequences of social cheating. Am Nat 177:288–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Winston ML, Taylor OR (1980) Factors preceding queen rearing in the Africanized honeybee (Apis melifera) in South America. Insect Soc 27:289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Woyke J (1971) Correlations between the age at which honeybee brood was grafted, characteristics of the resultant queens, and results of insemination. J Apic Res 10:45–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Tarpy
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • M. Simone-Finstrom
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • T. A. Linksvayer
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral BiologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics and Physiology ResearchUSDA-ARSBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations