Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 471–477 | Cite as

Predation on large millipedes and self-assembling chains in Leptogenys ants from Cambodia

Research Article

Abstract

Various ants can link their bodies in chains or other structures, a striking example of cooperation. Chain behavior in Leptogenys sp. functions for the collective transport of large millipedes. This undescribed Leptogenys species is a swarm raider with a small range of prey: millipedes belonging to four orders (Polydesmida, Spirostreptida, Spirobolida, Sphaerotheriida), and occasional earthworms. Small prey were carried individually or dragged by a few ants, while chains made it possible to move millipedes weighing up to 16.4 g. Chains (either linear or branched) changed according to obstacles along the way to the nests. Between 2 and 52 workers were observed to drag single prey items, with only a few ants directly grasping the prey. One 15-cm-long millipede was captured rodeo-style after being encircled by 25–30 ants. As it uncurled from a defensive coil, the ants held back except one that tried to sting between its legs. The millipede started thrashing about which caused many ants to attempt stinging. While four other ponerine genera hunt millipedes solitarily, chains have never been reported.

Keywords

Cooperative transport Self-assemblages Swarm raiding Foraging Ponerinae Diplopods Spirostreptida Sphaerotheriida 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Sophany Phauk (Royal University, Phnom Penh) for support, Jean-Jacques Geoffroy (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris) and Sergei Golovatch (Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow) for identification of millipedes, Seiki Yamane and Koichi Arimoto (Kyushu University, Fukuoka) for help with Leptogenys taxonomy, Adam Cronin, Tomer Czaczkes and Thibaud Monnin for useful comments. CP is funded by the French National Research Agency (ANTEVO ANR-12-JSV7-0003-01).

Supplementary material

40_2015_426_MOESM1_ESM.jpeg (2.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 2658 kb)

References

  1. Anderson C, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J-L (2002) Self-assemblages in insect societies. Insect Soc 49:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolton B (1974) A revision of the Ponerine ant genus Plectroctena F. Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bull Br Mus (Nat Hist) Entomol 30:309–338Google Scholar
  3. Bolton B (1975) A revision of the ant genus Leptogenys Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Ethiopian Region, with a review of the Malagasy species. Bull Br Mus (Nat Hist) Entomol 31:235–305Google Scholar
  4. Brandão CRF, Diniz JL, Tomotake EM (1991) Thaumatomyrmex strips millipedes for prey: a novel predatory behaviour in ants, and the first case of sympatry in the genus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Soc 38:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown WL (1992) Two new species of Gnamptogenys, and an account of millipede predation by one of them. Psyche 99:275–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Czaczkes TJ, Ratnieks FL (2013) Cooperative transport in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and elsewhere. Myrme News 18:1–11Google Scholar
  7. Dejean A, Evraerts C (1997) Predatory behavior in the genus Leptogenys: a comparative study. J Insect Behav 10:177–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dejean A, Suzzoni JP, Schatz B (2001) Behavioral adaptations of an African ponerine ant in the capture of millipedes. Behaviour 138:981–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan FD, Crewe RM (1994) Group hunting in a ponerine ant, Leptogenys nitida Smith. Oecologia 97:118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisner T, Eisner M, Attygalle A, Deyrup M, Meinwald J (1998) Rendering the inedible edible: circumvention of a millipede’s chemical defense by a predaceous beetle larva (Phengodidae). PNAS 95:1108–1113PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ito F (1998) Colony composition and specialized predation on millipedes in the enigmatic ponerine ant genus Probolomyrmex (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Soc 45:79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jahyny B, Lacau S, Delabie JHC, Fresneau D (2008) Le genre Thaumatomyrmex Mayr 1887, cryptique et prédateur spécialiste de Diplopoda Penicillata. In: Jiménez E, Fernández F, Arias TM, Lozano-Zambrano FH (eds) Sistemática, biogeografía y conservación de las hormigas cazadoras de Colombia. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, pp 329–346Google Scholar
  13. Lattke JE (2011) Revision of the New World species of the genus Leptogenys Roger (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Arthropod Syst Phylog 69:127–264Google Scholar
  14. Longino J (2015) Ants of Costa Rica. http://ants.biology.utah.edu/~longino/Genera/Gnamptogenys/SPECIES/bispinosa/bispinosa.html. Accessed 29 March 2015
  15. McCreery HF, Breed MD (2013) Cooperative transport in ants: a review of proximate mechanisms. Insect Soc 61:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peeters C, Crewe R (1987) Foraging and recruitment in ponerine ants: solitary hunting in the queenless Ophthalmopone berthoudi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 94:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schatz B, Suzzoni JP, Corbara B, Dejean A (2001) Selection and capture of prey in the African ponerine ant Plectroctena minor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Acta Oecol 22:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schmidt C, Shattuck S (2014) The higher classification of the ant subfamily Ponerinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a review of ponerine ecology and behavior. Zootaxa 3817:1–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Willey RB, Brown WL (1983) New species of the ant genus Myopias (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Psyche 90:249–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Witte V, Schliessmann D, Hashim R (2010) Attack or call for help? Rapid individual decisions in a group-hunting ant. Behav Ecol 21:1040–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, UMR CNRS 7618Université Pierre et Marie CurieParisFrance
  2. 2.Siem ReapCambodia

Personalised recommendations