Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How plants and honeydew-producing hemipterans affect ant species richness and structure in a tropical forest zone

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) and hemipteran honeydew are often discussed as two alternative mechanisms encouraging ant visitation in mutualistic ant–plant relationships, but little is known about the processes that generate distribution pattern in species-rich insect communities. A case study on the interaction between ants, EFN-bearing plants and hemipterans was investigated along a gradient of increasing disturbance from regenerated forest to mixed crop field. Ants, EFN-bearing plants and hemipterans sampling was conducted in these vegetations during the wet and the dry seasons in five locations. Results showed that partitioning of ant species between season and vegetation was significantly different from random. High specialization index was observed in hemipterans/plants and ant/hemipterans interactions. Low specialization index was observed between ants and EFN-bearing plants mainly in the mixed crop field. Ant species were mostly found in non-aggressive co-occurrence at nectar sources. At the species level, specialization index was high for Anoplolepis tenella (0.86 ± 0.06) and also for its associated hemipterans Stictococcus vayssierei (0.97 ± 0.02). This association is detrimental to food crop especially cassava. These results outline the effect of vegetation and food source on the structure of the ant assemblage and interaction in tropical forest zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armbrecht I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2004) Enigmatic biodiversity correlations: ant diversity responds to diverse resources. Science 304:284–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dov Y, Hodgson CJ (1997) Soft scale insects: their biology, natural enemies and control. World crop pests 7A. Elsevier, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Blüthgen N (2010) Montecarlo-statistics on R × C matrices. http://rxc.sys-bio.net/. Accessed 17 Feb 2010

  • Blüthgen N, Fiedler K (2004) Competition for composition: lessons from nectar-feeding ant communities. Ecology 85:1479–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Verhaagh M, Goitìa W (2000) How plants shape the ant community in the amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125:229–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Gottsberger G, Fiedler K (2004a) Sugar and amino acid composition of ant-attended nectar and honeydew sources from an Australian rainforest. Austral Ecol 29:418–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Stork NE, Fiedler K (2004b) Bottom-up control and co-occurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic. Oikos 106:344–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Blüthgen N (2006) Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecol 6:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Hovestadt T, Fiala B, Blüthgen N (2007) Specialization, constraints, and conflicting interests in mutualistic networks. Curr Biol 17:341–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1994) Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, London 222p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B, Fisher BL (2008a) The Afrotropical ponerine ant genus Asphinctopone Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 1827:53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B, Fisher BL (2008b) The Afrotropical ponerine ant genus Phrynoponera Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 1892:35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B, Fisher BL (2008c) Afrotropical ants of the ponerine genera Centromyrmex Mayr, Promyopias Santschi gen. rev. and Feroponera gen. n., with a revised key to genera of African Ponerinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 1929:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B, Fisher BL (2011) Taxonomy of Afrotropical and West Palaearctic ants of the ponerine genus Hypoponera Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 2843:1–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewitt K, Pinol J, Werner C, Beyschlag W, Espadaler X, Perez Hidalgo N, Platner C (2015) Evaluating the importance of trophobiosis in a Mediterranean ant community: a stable isotope analysis. Insect Soc 62:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley RC (1987) Interactions involving plants, homoptera, and ants. Ann Rev Ecol Sys 18:111–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley RC, Gullan P (1991) More aggressive ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) provide better protection for soft scale and mealybugs (Homoptera: Coccidae, Pseudococcidae). Biotropica 23:282–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos RI, Camacho GP (2014) Ant-plant interactions: the importance of extrafloral nectaries versus hemipteran honeydew on plant defense against herbivores. Arthropod-Plant Interact 8:507–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9

  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil Trans R Soc London 345:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman JH, Addicott J (1991) Conditional interactions in ant-plant-herbivore mutualisms. In: Huxley CR, Cutler DF (eds) Ant-plant interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 92–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A, Matile-Ferrero D (1996) How a ground-nesting ant species favors the proliferation of an endemic scale insect (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Homoptera, Stictococcidae). Sociobiology 28:183–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Del-Claro K, Oliveira PS (2000) Conditional outcomes in a Neotropical treehopper-ant association: temporal and species-specific variation in ant protection and homopteran fecundity. Oecologia 124:156–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Giusto B, Anstett MC, Dounias E, McKey D (2001) Variation in the effectiveness of biotic defense: the case of an opportunistic ant-plant protection mutualism. Oecologia 129:367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas AE (1993) The nutritional quality of phloem sap utilized by natural aphid populations. Ecol Entomol 18:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagundes M, Neves FS, Fernandes GW (2005) Direct and indirect interactions involving ants, insect herbivores, parasitoids, and the host plant Baccharis dracunculifolia (Asteraceae). Ecol Entomol 30:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MK, Völkl W, Hoffmann KH (2005) Honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition of polyphagous black bean aphid, Aphis fabae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on various host plants and implications for ant-attendance. Eur J Entomol 102:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotso Kuate A, Tindo M, Hanna R, Kenne M, Goergen G (2005) Field abundance and nest structure of the ant Anoplolepis tenella associated with the African root and tuber scale in the Congo basin. In: Mouliom PA, Tindo M, Ngoko Z, Dibog L (eds) 1st international symposium on crops integrated pest management in the CEMAC zone. University of Dschang, Dschang, pp 203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotso Kuate A, Tindo M, Hanna R, Kenne M, Goergen G (2008) Foraging activity and diet of the ant, Anoplolepis tenella Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in southern Cameroon. Afr Entomol 16:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotso Kuate A, Hanna R, Tindo M, Nanga Nanga S, Nagel P (2015) Ant diversity in dominant vegetation types of southern Cameroon. Biotropica 47:94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, McKey D (2003) Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:425–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson CJ (1994) The scale insect family Coccidae: an identification manual to genera. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogervorst PAM, Wäckers FL, Romeis J (2007) Effects of honeydew sugar composition on the longevity of Aphidius ervi. Entomol Exp Appl 122:223–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hossaert-McKey M, Orivel J, Labeyrie E, Pascal L, Delabie JHC, Dejean A (2001) Differential associations with ants of three co-occurring extrafloral nectary-bearing plants. EcoScience 8:325–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter MD, Price PW (1992) Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73:724–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1966) Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20:249–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klitgard BB, Lewis GP (2010) Neotropical Leguminosae (Mimosoideae). In: Milliken W, Klitgard BB, Baracat A (2009 onwards) (eds) Neotropikey—Interactive key and information resources for flowering plants of the Neotropics. http://www.kew.org/science/tropamerica/neotropikey/families/Leguminosae_%28Caesalpinioideae%29.htm

  • Koptur S (1992) Extrafloral nectary-mediated interactions between insects and plants. In: Bernays E (ed) Insect-plant interactions, vol 4. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 81–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Koptur S (2005) Nectar as fuel for plant protectors. In: Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ, Bruin J (eds) Plant-provided food and herbivore–carnivore interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 75–108

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • LaPolla JS, Brady SG, Shattuck SO (2010) Phylogeny and taxonomy of the Prenolepis genus-group of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst Entomol 35:118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen KJ, Staehle LM, Dotseth EJ (2001) Tending ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) regulate Dalbulus quinquenotatus (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) population dynamics. Environ Entomol 30:757–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKey D, Meunier L (1996) Evolution des mutualismes plantes-fourmi: quelques éléments de réflexion. Actes Coll Insectes Soc 10:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckey D, Gaume L, Brouat C, Di Giusto B, Pascal L, Debout G, Dalecky A, Heil M (2005) The trophic structure of tropical ant–plant–herbivore interactions community consequences and coevolutionary dynamics. Biotic interactions in the tropics: their role in the maintenance of species diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge BA, Olson AM, Dahlhoff EP (2002) Environmental stress, bottom-up effects, and community dynamics: integrating molecular-physiological and ecological approaches. Integr Comp Biol 42:892–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mody K, Linsenmair KE (2004) Plant-attracted ants affect arthropod community structure but not necessarily herbivory. Ecol Entomol 29:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness JH, Bronstein JL (2004) The effects of invasive ants on prospective ant mutualists. Biol Invasions 6:445–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PS, Brandão CRF (1991) The ant community associated with extrafloral nectaries in the Brazilian cerrados. In: Huxley CR, Cutle DF (eds) Ant-plant interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 198–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira PS, Del-Claro K (2005) Multitrophic interactions in a neotropical savanna: Ant–hemipteran systems, associated insect herbivores and a host plant. In: Burslem D, Pinard M, Hartley S (eds) Biotic interactions in the tropics: Their role in the maintenance of species diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 414–438

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rezende MQ, Venzon M, Perez AL, Cardoso IM, Janssen A (2014) Extrafloral nectaries of associated trees can enhance natural pest control. Agric Ecosyst Environ 188:198–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Gray V, García-Franco JG, Palacios-Rios M, Díaz-Castelazo C, Parra-Tabla V, Navarro JA (1998) Geographical and seasonal variation in the richness of ant–plant interactions in Mexico. Biotropica 30:190–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobrinho TG, Schoereder JH, Rodrigues LL, Collevatti RG (2002) Ant visitation (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) to extrafloral nectaries increases seed set and seed viability in the tropical weed Triumfetta semitriloba. Sociobiology 39:353–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadu Z, Djiéto-Lordon C, Yede, Messop Youbi EB, Fomena A, Babin R (2014) Ant diversity in different cocoa agroforest habitats in the Centre Region of Cameroon. Afr Entomol 22:388–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B (2014) The ants of (sub-Saharan) Africa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (2010). http://antsofafrica.org. Accessed 21st Nov 2014

  • Thenkabail PS (1999) Characterization of the alternative to slash-and-burn benchmark research area representing the Congolese rainforests of Africa using near-real-time spot HRV data. Int J Remote Sens 20:839–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindo M, Doumtsop A, Georgen G, Hanna R (2006) Morphological description and illustration of female developmental stages of Stictococcus vayssierei (Homoptera: Stictococcidae). Int J Trop Insect Sci 26:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindo M, Hanna R, Georgen G, Zapfack L, Tata-Hangy K, Attey A (2009) Host plants of Stictococcus vayssierei Richard (Stictococcidae) in non-crop vegetation in the Congo basin and implications for developing scale management options. Int J Pest Manage 55:339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Völkl W, Woodring J, Fischer M (1999) Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences. Oecologia 118:483–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wäckers FL (2000) Do oligosaccharides reduce the suitability of honeydew for predators and parasitoids? A further facet to the function of insect-synthesized honeydew sugars. Oikos 90:197–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wäckers FL, Van Rijn PCJ, Heimpel GE (2007) Exploiting honeydew as a food source: making the best of a bad meal? Biol Control 45:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward PS, Brady SG, Fisher BL, Schultz TR (2015) The evolution of myrmicine ants: phylogeny and biogeography of a hyperdiverse ant clade (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst Entomol 40:61–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way MJ (1963) Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing homoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 8:307–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way MJ, Khoo KC (1992) Role of ant in pest management. Annu Rev Entomol 37:479–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DJ, Matile-Ferrero D, Miller DR (2010) A study of some species of the genus Stictococcus cockerell (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Stictococcidae), and a discussion on Stictococcus vayssierei Richard, a species injurious to cassava in equatorial Africa with a description of a new species from Nigeria. Zootaxa 2527:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachariades C, Compton SG, Schatz B (2009) Honeydew as danegeld? Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) tending a honeydew-producing homopteran do not offer protection from its main natural enemies. Sociobiology 54:471–488

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by special project funds provided to the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture by the Research Fellow Partnership Program (RFPP) and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). We are grateful to referees for their helpful comments on the earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, BP 2008, Yaounde-Messa, Cameroon

    A. K. Fotso, R. Hanna & A. Doumtsop

  2. Faculty of Science, University of Douala, BP 24157, Douala, Cameroon

    M. Tindo

  3. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, 4057, Basel, Switzerland

    P. Nagel

Authors
  1. A. K. Fotso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Hanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Tindo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Doumtsop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Nagel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Fotso.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fotso, A.K., Hanna, R., Tindo, M. et al. How plants and honeydew-producing hemipterans affect ant species richness and structure in a tropical forest zone. Insect. Soc. 62, 443–453 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-015-0423-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-015-0423-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation