Queen pheromone promotes production of salivary lysozyme by workers in a termite
Social insects have highly elaborated communication systems. In particular, communication via pheromones is important for maintaining complex social roles and behaviors. Brood care is a typical activity that involves pheromonal communication among colony members. In termites, eggs cannot survive without grooming by workers. The workers coat the eggs with their saliva, which contains an antibacterial protein lysozyme that protects the eggs against bacterial pathogens. The more eggs a colony has, the more salivary lysozyme the workers need to produce for egg grooming. However, it is unknown how termite workers regulate their lysozyme production. Here we show that the queen pheromone, which is emitted by both queens and eggs, promotes lysozyme production by workers in the termite Reticulitermes speratus. Exposure to artificial queen pheromone significantly increased the production of salivary lysozyme by workers as well as the artificial addition of eggs. Furthermore, our survey of field colonies revealed clear seasonality in the production of salivary lysozyme. The seasonal pattern of lysozyme production matched well with the seasonal change of the number of eggs per colony. In addition to the known function of the queen pheromone as an inhibitor of neotenic queen differentiation, this study reveals that the same pheromone also acts as a promoter of lysozyme production in workers. We describe a novel function of the multifunctional queen pheromone in termites and provide new insights into the evolutionary parsimony of social insect pheromones.
KeywordsEvolutionary parsimony Queen pheromone Social insects Multifunctional pheromone Salivary lysozyme
We thank Dr. Kazuya Kobayashi and Dr. Toshihisa Yashiro for helpful comments. This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 25221206).
- Ayasse M, Paxton RJ (2002) Brood protection in social insects. In: Hilker M, Meiners T (eds) Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell, Berlin, pp 117–148Google Scholar
- Bordereau C, Pasteels JM (2011) Pheromones and chemical ecology of dispersal and foraging in termites. In: Bignell DE, Roisin Y, Lo N (eds) Biology of termites: a modern synthesis. Springer, Netherlands, pp 279–320Google Scholar
- Clément JL, Bagnères AG (1998) Nestmate recognition in termites. In: Vander Meer RK, Breed MD, Winston ML, Espelie KE (eds) Pheromone communication in social insects: ants, wasps, bees and termites. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 126–155Google Scholar
- Fujita A, Shimizu I, Abe T (2001) Distribution of lysozyme and protease, and amino acid concentration in the guts of a wood-feeding termite, Reticulitermes speratus (Kolbe): possible digestion of symbiont bacteria transferred by trophallaxis. Physiol Entomol 26:116–123. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2001.00224.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Howard RW (1993) Cuticular hydrocarbons and chemical communication. In: Stanley-Samuelson DW, Nelson DR (eds) Insect lipids: chemistry, biochemistry and biology. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 179–226Google Scholar
- Mednikova TK, Tiunova NA (1984) Activity of lysozyme and 1-3-beta-glucanase in the salivary glands and gut of different castes of the termite Anacanthotermes ahngerianus. J Evol Biochem Physiol 20:93–97Google Scholar
- Pasteels JM, Bordereau C (1998) Releaser pheromones in termites. In: Vander Meer RK, Breed MD, Winston ML, Espelie KE (eds) Pheromone communication in social insects: ants, wasps, bees and termites. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 193–215Google Scholar
- Vander Meer RK, Breed MD, Winston ML, Espelie KE (1998) Pheromone communication in social insects: ants, wasps, bees and termites. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar