Advertisement

Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 437–444 | Cite as

Relationship between the age of Vespa velutina workers and their defensive behaviour established from colonies maintained in the laboratory

  • K. Monceau
  • O. Bonnard
  • D. ThiéryEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

As the structural bases of insect societies are essential to colony survival, nests must be protected from predation. Nest defence behaviours are among the most important roles assigned to worker members. However, in hornet societies, temporal polyethism (age-dependent division of labour among workers) is assumed to be weak. Few studies have investigated this phenomenon, probably because hornet nests are aggressively defended and dangerous to approach. In the present study, we propose a method for rearing nests of Vespa velutina, a species newly introduced into Europe. This method enables the handling of hornets, and thus the design of experiments. By marking all newly emerged hornets, we recorded aggressiveness in workers of different ages from three captive colonies. We observed that nest defence behaviour in V. velutina depends on the age of the workers. Nest defence appears to be mediated by the queen, probably through pheromones that promote nest organization. We also identified a previously unreported but important behaviour in V. velutina that workers are aggressive towards male hornets. This behaviour might be a strategy to avoid inbreeding. Collectively, our results provide new research perspectives for the management of social hymenopteran predators.

Keywords

Division of labour Inbreeding Queen control Social insects Temporal polyethism Vespidae Yellow-legged hornet 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by INRA, a grant from Région Aquitaine and the French Ministry of Environment. This research was undertaken within the Labex COTE research project. We would like to thank Mr. C. Lacoste, Mrs. M. Desrois and SDAR services from INRA Bordeaux-Aquitaine for constructing our V. velutina proof cages and Mr. J. Martrenchar and Mr. D. Barnier for collecting the nests. We also thank Mr. B. Chauvin, Mrs. E. Segura, Mrs. A. Tourat and Mrs Q. Médalin for their technical help. We also thank Dr. O. Le Gall for his personnal encouragements.

Supplementary material

40_2013_308_MOESM1_ESM.doc (101 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 100 kb)

References

  1. Archer M.E. 2010. The queen colony phase of vespine wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insect. Soc. 57: 33-145Google Scholar
  2. Beggs J.R., Brockerhoff E.G., Corley J.C., Kenis K., Masciocchi M., Muller F., Rome Q. and Villemant C. 2011. Ecological effects and management of invasive Vespidae. BioControl 56: 505-526Google Scholar
  3. Beshers S.N. and Fewell J.H. 2001. Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 413-440Google Scholar
  4. Bonnard O., Monceau K. and Thiéry D. 2012. Elevage de colonies de Vespa velutina, un prédateur d’abeilles domestiques récemment introduit en France. Cah. Tech. Inra 76: 1-11. http://www6.bordeaux-aquitaine.inra.fr/sante-agroecologie-vignoble/Publications/Articles-sans-comite-de-lecture. Accessed on 28 May 2013
  5. Brown M.J.F. and Paxton R.J. 2009. The conservation of bees: a global perspective. Apidologie 40: 410-416Google Scholar
  6. Calderone N.W. 1998. Proximate mechanisms of age polyethism in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Apidologie 29: 127-158Google Scholar
  7. Courchamp F., Clutton-Brock T. and Grenfell B. 1999. Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 405-410Google Scholar
  8. Dew H.E. and Michener C.D. 1981. Division of labor among workers of Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): laboratory foraging activities. Insect. Soc. 28: 87-101Google Scholar
  9. Edwards R. 1980. Social Wasps. Their Behaviour and Control. Rentokil Limited, SussexGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox J. and Weisberg S. 2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression, Second Edition. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagler J.R. and Jackson C.G. 2001. Methods for marking insects: current techniques and future prospects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 511-543Google Scholar
  12. Hoffmann W.R.E., Neumann P. and Schmolz E. 2000. Technique for rearing the European hornet (Vespa crabro) through an entire colony life cycle in captivity. Insect. Soc. 47: 351-353Google Scholar
  13. Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 2008. The Superorganism. W.W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Hurd C.R., Jeanne R.L. and Nordheim E.V. 2007. Temporal polyethism and worker specialization in the wasp, Vespula germanica. J. Insect Sci. 7: 43. http://www.insectscience.org/7.43/ Accessed on 28 May 2013
  15. Janet C. 1895. Etudes sur les fourmis, les guêpes et les abeilles. Neuvième note. Sur Vespa crabro L. Histoire d’un nid depuis son origine. Mem. Soc. Zool. Fr. 8: 1-140Google Scholar
  16. Jeanne R.L. 1991. Polyethism. In: The Social Biology of Wasps (Ross K.G. and Matthews R.W., Eds), Cornell University Press, New York. pp 389-425Google Scholar
  17. Jeanne R.L. 2003. Social complexity in the Hymenoptera, with special attention to the wasps. In: Behaviors and Evolution of Social Insects (Kikuchi T., Azuma N. and Higashi S., Eds). Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo. pp 81-130Google Scholar
  18. Jeanne R.L., Downing H.A. and Post D.C. 1988. Age polyethism and individual variation in Polybia occidentalis, an advanced eusocial wasp. In: Interindividual Behavioral Variability in the Social Insects (Jeanne R.L., Ed). Westview Press, Boulder. pp 323-357Google Scholar
  19. Jeanne R.L., Williams N.M. and Yandell B.S. 1992. Age polyethism and defense in a tropical social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Insect Behav. 5: 211-227Google Scholar
  20. Johnson B.R. 2010. Division of labor in honeybees: form, function, and proximate mechanisms. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 305-316Google Scholar
  21. Judd T.M. 2000. Division of labour in colony defence against vertebrate predators by the social wasp Polistes fuscatus. Anim. Behav. 60: 55-61Google Scholar
  22. Kim B., Kim K.W. and Choe J.C. 2012. Temporal polyethism in Korean yellowjacket foragers, Vespula koreensis (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insect. Soc. 59: 263-268Google Scholar
  23. Liebhold A.M. and Tobin P.C. 2008. Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53: 387-408Google Scholar
  24. Martin S.J. 1995. Hornets (Hymenoptera: Vespinae) of Malaysia. Malay. Nat. J. 49: 71-82Google Scholar
  25. Matsuura M. 1984. Comparative biology of five Japanese species of the genus Vespa (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Bull. Fac. Agri., Mie Univ. 69: 1-131Google Scholar
  26. Matsuura M. 1991. Vespa and Provespa. In: The Social Biology of Wasps (Ross K.G. and Matthews R.W., Eds), Cornell University Press, Ithaca. pp 232-262Google Scholar
  27. Matsuura M. and Yamane S. 1990. Biology of Vespine Wasps. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. Moller H. 1996. Lessons for invasion theory from social insects. Biol. Conserv. 78: 125-142Google Scholar
  29. Monceau K., Arca M., Leprêtre L., Mougel F., Bonnard O., Silvain J.-F., Maher N., Arnold G. and Thiéry D. 2013b. Native prey and invasive predator patterns of foraging activity: the case of the yellow-legged hornet predation at European honeybee hives. PLoS ONE 8: e66492Google Scholar
  30. Monceau K., Maher N., Bonnard O., Thiéry D. 2013a. Predation dynamics study of the recently introduced honeybee killer Vespa velutina: learning from the enemy. Apidologie 44: 209-221Google Scholar
  31. Moreyra S., D’Adamo P. and Lozada M. 2012. Cognitive processes in Vespula germanica (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) when relocating a food source. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 105: 128-133Google Scholar
  32. Perrard A., Haxaire J., Rortais A., Villemant C. 2009. Observations on the colony activity of the Asian hornet Vespa velutina Lepeletier 1836 (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Vespinae) in France. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 45: 119-127Google Scholar
  33. Potts S.G., Biesmeijer J.C., Kremen C., Neumann P., Schweiger O. and Kunin W.E. 2010. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 345-353Google Scholar
  34. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org. Accessed on 28 May 2013
  35. Robinson G.E. 1992. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37: 637-665Google Scholar
  36. Roitberg B.D. 2007. Why pest management needs behavioral ecology and vice versa. Entomol. Res. 37: 14-18Google Scholar
  37. Roy H.E., Roy D.B. and Roques A. 2011. Inventory of terrestrial alien arthropod predators and parasites established in Europe. BioControl 56: 477-504Google Scholar
  38. Spradbery J.P. 1973. Wasps: An Account of the Biology and Natural History of Social and Solitary Wasps. University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar
  39. Spradbery J.P. 1991. Evolution of queen number and queen control. In: The Social Biology of Wasps (Ross K.G. and Matthews R.W., Eds), New York, Cornell University Press. pp 336-388Google Scholar
  40. Starr C.K. 1985. Enabling mechanisms in the origin of the sociality in the Hymenoptera: the sting’s on the thing. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 78: 836-840Google Scholar
  41. Starr C.K. 1990. Holding the fort: colony defense in some primitively social wasps. In: Insect Defences. Adaptative Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators (Evans D.L. and Schmidt J.O., Eds). State University of New York Press, Albany. pp 421-463Google Scholar
  42. Starr C.K. 1992. The social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) of Taiwan. Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. 3: 93-138Google Scholar
  43. Strassmann J.E. 1981. Parasitoids, predators, and group size in the paper wasp, Polistes exclamans. Ecology 62: 1225-1233Google Scholar
  44. Tabadkani S.M., Nozari J. and Lihoreau M. 2012. Inbreeding and the evolution of sociality in arthropods. Naturwissenschaften 99: 779-788Google Scholar
  45. Tobin P.C., Berek L. and Liebhold A.M. 2011. Exploiting Allee effects for managing biological invasions. Ecol. Lett. 14:615-624Google Scholar
  46. Togni O.C. and Giannotti E. 2010. Colony defense behavior of the primitively eusocial wasp, Mischocyttarus cerberus is related to age. J. Insect Sci. 10: 136. http://www.insectscience.org/10.136/ Accessed 28 May 2013
  47. Toh Y. and Okamura J.-Y. 2003. Foraging navigation of hornets studied in natural habitats and laboratory experiments. Zool. Sci. 20: 311-324Google Scholar
  48. Villemant C., Muller F., Haubois S., Perrard A., Darrouzet E. and Rome Q. 2011. Bilan des travaux (MNHN et IRBI) sur l’invasion en France de Vespa velutina, le frelon asiatique prédateur d’abeilles. In: Journée Scientifique Apicole (Barbançon J.-M. and L’Hostis M., Ed). Nantes, ONIRIS-FNOSAD. pp 3-12Google Scholar
  49. Volynchik S., Plotkin M., Bergman D.J. and Ishay J.S. 2009. Polyethism in an Oriental hornet (Vespa orientalis) colony. Sch. Res. Exch. doi: 10.3814/2009/243436
  50. Wakano J.Y., Nakata K. and Yamamura N. 1998. Dynamic model of optimal age polyethism in social insects under stable and fluctuating environments. J. Theor. Biol. 193: 153-165Google Scholar
  51. Warkentin K.M., Buckley C.R. and Metcalf K.A. 2006. Development of red-eyed treefrog eggs affects efficiency and choices of egg-foraging wasps. Anim. Behav. 71: 417-425Google Scholar
  52. Weiss M.R., Wilson E.E. and Castellanos I. 2004. Predatory wasps learn to overcome the shelter defences of their larval prey. Anim. Behav. 68: 45-54Google Scholar
  53. Wilson E.O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Cambridge. MA: Belknap/Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INRA, UMR 1065 Santé et Agroécologie du VignobleVillenave d’OrnonFrance
  2. 2.Université de BordeauxISVV, UMR 1065 Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble, Bordeaux Sciences AgroVillenave d’OrnonFrance

Personalised recommendations