Advertisement

Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 345–350 | Cite as

Virgin wasps develop ovaries on par with mated females, but lay fewer eggs

  • S. Shukla
  • M. C. Shilpa
  • R. GadagkarEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

In the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata, mating is not necessary for a female wasp to develop her ovaries, lay eggs, and even to become the sole egg layer of her colony despite the presence of other mated nestmates. Here, we show that virgin wasps do not differ from their mated counterparts in the extent and rapidity of their ovarian development, in the proportion of individuals that build a nest and laid eggs, and in the time taken to do so. However, a significantly larger proportion of virgin females showed resorbing oocytes, and laid fewer eggs as compared to mated individuals. Thus, virgin females have the ability to develop ovaries and lay eggs but also to refrain from necessarily laying all mature eggs produced, before mating opportunities arise. This dual ability would be adaptive in haplodiploid, tropical species with perennial nesting cycles and frequent opportunities for workers to become replacement queens or solitary nest foundresses throughout the year.

Keywords

Eusociality Mating Ovarian development Virgin females Nest initiation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Department of Science and Technology, Department of Biotechnology, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, and the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India. RG and SS designed the study, SS performed dissections and data analysis, MCS carried out behavioural observations, body size measurements and maintained wasps, RG supervised the work and SS and RG co-wrote the paper. We thank Ruchira Sen and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Arnqvist G. and Nilsson T. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60: 145–164Google Scholar
  2. Bloch Qazi M., Heifetz Y. and Wolfner M. 2003. The developments between gametogenesis and fertilisation: ovulation and female sperm storage in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 256: 195–211Google Scholar
  3. Bourke A.F.G. 1988. Worker reproduction in the higher eusocial Hymenoptera. Q. Rev. Biol. 63: 291–311Google Scholar
  4. Chandrashekara K. and Gadagkar R. 1991a. Behavioral castes, dominance and division of labour in a primitively eusocial wasp. Ethology 87: 269–283Google Scholar
  5. Chandrashekara K. and Gadagkar R. 1991b. Unmated queens in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata (Lep.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Insect. Soc. 38: 213–216Google Scholar
  6. Chandrashekara K. and Gadagkar R. 1992. Queen succession in the primitively eusocial tropical wasp Ropalidia marginata (Lep.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Insect Behav. 5: 193–209Google Scholar
  7. Davey K.G. 1997. Hormonal controls on reproduction in female Heteroptera. Arch. Insect Biochem. 35: 443–453Google Scholar
  8. de Souza E.A., Neves C.A., Campos L.A.O., Aanuncio J.C. and Serrao J.E. 2007. Effect of mating delay on the ovary of Melipona quadrifasciata anthidioides (Hymenoptera: Apidae) queens. Micron 38: 471–477Google Scholar
  9. Downing H.A. 2004. Effect of mated condition on dominance interactions and nesting behavior in the social wasp, Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 77: 288–291Google Scholar
  10. Dropkin J.A. and Gamboa G.J. 1981. Physical comparisons of foundresses of the paper wasp, Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Can. Entomol. 113: 457–461Google Scholar
  11. Gadagkar R. 2001. The Social Biology of Ropalidia marginata: Toward Understanding the Evolution of Eusociality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  12. Gadagkar R., Bhagavan S., Malpe R. and Vinutha C. 1991a. Seasonal variation in the onset of egg laying in a primitively eusocial wasp: implications for the evolution of sociality. Entomon 16: 167–174Google Scholar
  13. Gadagkar R., Bhagavan S., Chandrashekara K. and Vinutha C. 1991b. The role of larval nutrition in pre-imaginal biasing of caste in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ecol. Entomol. 16: 435–440Google Scholar
  14. Gadagkar R., Chandrashekara K., Chandran S. and Bhagavan S. 1993. Serial polygyny in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata: implications for the evolution of sociality. In: Queen Number and Sociality in Insects (Keller L., Ed), Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp 188–214Google Scholar
  15. Gadagkar R., Gadgil M., Joshi N.V. and Mahabal A.S. 1982. Observations on the natural history and population ecology of the social wasp Ropalidia marginata (Lep.) from peninsular India (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Proc. Indian Acad. Sciences (Animal Sciences) 91: 539–552Google Scholar
  16. Gadagkar R., Vinutha C., Shanbhogue A. and Gore A.P. 1988. Pre-imaginal caste biasing of caste in a primitively eusocial insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 233: 175–189Google Scholar
  17. Gobin B., Peeters C. and Billen J. 1998. Production of trophic eggs by virgin workers in the ponerine ant Gnamptogenys menadensis. Physiol. Entomol. 23: 329–336Google Scholar
  18. Harrell F.E. Jr. 2013. Rms: Regression modeling strategies. R package version 3.6-3Google Scholar
  19. Horner V.L. and Wolfner M.F. 2008. Transitioning from egg to embryo: triggers and mechanism of egg activation. Dev. Dynam. 237: 527–544Google Scholar
  20. Henter H.J. 2003. Inbreeding depression and halpodiploidy: experimental measures in a parastioid and comparisons across diploid and haplodiploid insect taxa. Evolution 57: 1793–1803Google Scholar
  21. Jemielity S., Graff J. and Keller L. 2006. How to fool a virgin: Artificial dealation triggers oviposition in virgin Lasius niger queens. Insect. Soc. 53: 323–325Google Scholar
  22. Karsai I. and Hunt J.H. 2002. Food quantity affects traits of offspring in the paper wasp Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Environ. Entomol. 31: 99–106Google Scholar
  23. King P.E.1962. The effect of resorbing eggs upon the sex ratio of the offspring in Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae). J. Exp. Biol. 39: 161–165Google Scholar
  24. Melo G.A.R., Buschini M.L.T. and Campos L.A.O. 2001. Ovarian activation in Melipona quadrifasciata queens triggered by mating plug stimulation. Apidologie 32: 355–361Google Scholar
  25. Muralidharan K., Shaila M.S. and Gadagkar R. 1986. Evidence for multiple mating in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata (Lep.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Genet. 65: 153–158Google Scholar
  26. Ohgushi T. 1996. A reproductive trade-off in an herbivorous lady beetle: egg resorption and female survival. Oecologia 106: 345–351Google Scholar
  27. Pardi L. and Marino Piccioli M.T. 1970. Studi sulla biologia di Belanogaster griseus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). 2. Differenziamento castale incipiente in B. griseus (Fab.). Mon. Ital. Zool. 3: 235–265Google Scholar
  28. Peer K. and Taborsky M. 2005. Outbreeding depression, but no inbreeding depression in haplodiploid ambrosia beetles with regular sibling mating. Evolution 59: 317–323Google Scholar
  29. Patricio K. and Cruz-Landim C. 2007. Effect of mating delay in the ovary of Apis mellifera queens: histological aspects. Braz. J. Morphol. Sci. 24: 25–28Google Scholar
  30. Peeters C. and Crewe R.M. 1984. Insemination controls the reproductive division of labour in a ponerine ant. Naturwissenschaften 71: 50–51Google Scholar
  31. Peso M., Niño E.L., Grozinger C.M. and Barron A.B. 2013. Effect of honey bee queen mating condition on worker ovary activation. Insect. Soc. 60: 123–133Google Scholar
  32. Pinheiro J., Bates D., DebRoy S., Sarkar D. and the R Development Core Team. 2013. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–108Google Scholar
  33. Plateaux-Quénu C. and Packer L. 1998. A test of the mating limitation hypothesis for caste determination in Evylaeus albipes (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), a primitively eusocial Halictine bee. J. Insect Behav. 11: 119–128Google Scholar
  34. R Development Core Team 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  35. Raabe M. 1986. Insect reproduction: regulation of successive steps. In: Advances in Insect Physiology (Evans P.D. and Wigglesworth V.B., Eds), Academic Press, London. pp 30–154Google Scholar
  36. Richards M.H. and Packer L. 1996. The sociobiology of body size variation in the primitively eusocial sweat bee, Halictus ligatus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Oikos 77: 68–76Google Scholar
  37. Saito Y., Sahara K. and Mori K. 2000. Inbreeding depression by recessive deleterious genes affecting female fecundity of a haplo-diploid mite. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 668–678Google Scholar
  38. Sen R., Samudre S., Shilpa M.C., Chitra Tarak R. and Gadagkar R. 2010. Middle aged wasps mate throughout most of the year, without regard to body size, ovarian development and nestmateship: a laboratory study of the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Insect. Soc. 57: 95–103Google Scholar
  39. Shilpa M.C., Sen R. and Gadagkar R. 2010. Nestmateship and body size do not influence mate choice in males and females: A laboratory study of a primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Behav. Proc. 85: 42–46Google Scholar
  40. Shilpa M.C., Sen R., Samudre S. and Gadagkar R. 2012. Males, but not females, mate with multiple partners: a laboratory study of a primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Insect. Soc. 59: 61–65Google Scholar
  41. Shukla S., Chandran S. and Gadagkar R. 2013. Ovarian developmental variation in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata suggests a gateway to worker ontogeny and the evolution of sociality. J. Exp. Biol. 216: 181–187Google Scholar
  42. Suzuki T. 1997. Worker mating in queen-right colonies of a temperate paper wasp. Naturwissenschaften 84: 304–305Google Scholar
  43. Tanaka E.D. and Hartfelder K. 2004. The initial stages of oogenesis and their relation to differential fertility in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) castes. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 33: 431–442Google Scholar
  44. Werren J.H. 1993. The evolution of inbreeding in haplodiploid organisms. In: The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (Thornhill N., Ed), University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp 42–59Google Scholar
  45. West-Eberhard M.J. 1969. The social biology of the polistine wasps. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 140: 1–101Google Scholar
  46. Yanega D. 1992. Does mating determine caste in sweat bees? (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 65: 231–237Google Scholar
  47. Yanega D. 1997. Demography and sociality in Halictine bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). In: The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids (Crespi B.J. and Choe J., Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 293–315Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Evolutionary and Organismal Biology UnitJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations