Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Colony-size effects on task organization in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus

Insectes Sociaux volume 60, pages 191–201 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Colony size is a fundamental attribute of insect societies that appears to play an important role in their organization of work. In the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus, division of labor increases with colony size during colony ontogeny and among unmanipulated colonies of the same age. However, the mechanism(s) integrating individual task specialization and colony size is unknown. To test whether the scaling of division of labor is an emergent epiphenomenon, as predicted by self-organizational models of task performance, we manipulated colony size in P. californicus and quantified short-term behavioral responses of individuals and colonies. Variation in colony size failed to elicit a change in division of labor, suggesting that colony-size effects on task specialization are mediated by slower developmental processes and/or correlates of colony size that were missing from our experiment. In contrast, the proportional allocation of workers to tasks shifted with colony size, suggesting that task needs or priorities depend, in part, on colony size alone. Finally, although task allocation was flexible, colony members differed consistently in task performance and spatial tendency across colony size treatments. Sources of interindividual behavioral variability include worker age and genotype (matriline).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Anderson C. and McShea D.W. 2001. Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies. Biol. Rev. 76: 211-237

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y. and Yekutieli D. 2001. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat. 29: 1165-1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Beshers S.N. and Fewell J.H. 2001. Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 413-440

    Google Scholar 

  • Beshers S.N., Robinson G.E. and Mittenthal J.E. 1999. Response thresholds and division of labor in insect colonies. In: Information Processing in Social Insects (Detrain C., Deneubourg J.L. and Pasteels J.M., Eds), Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland. pp 115-139

  • Bonabeau E., Theraulaz G. and Deneubourg J.L. 1996. Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263: 1565-1569

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner J.T. 2004. Perspective: the size-complexity rule. Evolution 58: 1883-1890

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J.J. and Traniello J.F.A. 1998. Regulation of brood-care behavior in the dimorphic castes of the ant Pheidole morrisi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): effects of caste ratio, colony size, and colony needs. J. Insect Behav. 11: 209-219

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabi P. and Traniello J.F.A. 1989. Behavioral flexibility in age castes of the ant Pheidole dentata. J. Insect Behav. 2: 663-677

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin N.F., Reeve H.K. and Cover S.P. 1993. Kin discrimination and division of labour among matrilines in the polygynous carpenter ant, Camponotus planatus. In: Queen Number and Sociality in Insects (Keller L., Ed), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp 362-401

  • Chittka L. and Muller H. 2009. Learning, specialization, efficiency and task allocation in social insects. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2: 151-154

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrain C. and Pasteels J.M. 1991. Caste differences in behavioral thresholds as a basis for polyethism during food recruitment in the ant, Pheidole pallidula Nyl. (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae). J. Insect Behav. 4: 157-176

  • Detrain C. and Pasteels J.M. 1992. Caste polyethism and collective defense in the ant, Pheidole pallidula: the outcome of quantitative differences in recruitment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 405-412

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolezal A.G., Brent C.S., Hölldobler B. and Amdam G.V. 2012. Worker division of labor and endocrine physiology are associated in the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. J. Exper. Biol. 215: 454-460

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A. 2008. Specialization does not predict individual efficiency in an ant. PLoS Biol. 6: e285

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A., Holley J.A. and Franks N.R. 2009. Larger colonies do not have more specialized workers in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Behav. Ecol. 20: 922-929

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A., Powell S. and Bengston S. 2012. Group size and its effects on collective organization. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 57: 123-141

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewell J.H. and Page R.E. 1993. Genotypic variation in foraging responses to environmental stimuli by honey bees, Apis mellifera. Experientia 49: 1106-1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewell J.H. and Winston M.L. 1992. Colony state and regulation of pollen foraging in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30: 387-393

  • Gautrais J., Theraulaz G., Deneubourg J.L. and Anderson C. 2002. Emergent polyethism as a consequence of increased colony size in insect societies. J. Theor. Biol. 215: 363-373

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D.M. 1989. Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants. Anim. Behav. 38: 194-204

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D.M. 1996. The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380: 121-124

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D.M., Chu J., Lillie A., Tissot M. and Pinter N. 2005. Variation in the transition from inside to outside work in the red harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Insect. Soc. 52: 212-217

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick R., Bertram S.M., Killeen P.R. and Fewell J.H. 2004. Normalized mutual entropy in biology: quantifying division of labor. Am. Nat. 164: 677-682

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook C.T. 2011. The emergence and scaling of division of labor in insect societies. Dissertation, Arizona State University

  • Holbrook C.T., Barden P.M. and Fewell J.H. 2011. Division of labor increases with colony size in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Behav. Ecol. 22: 90-96

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 2009. The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, NY

  • Holway D.A. and Case T.J. 2001. Effects of colony-level variation on competitive ability in the invasive Argentine ant. Anim. Behav. 61: 1181-1192

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z.Y. and Robinson G.E. 1999. Social control of division of labor in honey bee colonies. In: Information Processing in Social Insects (Detrain C., Deneubourg J.L. and Pasteels J.M., Eds), Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland. pp 165-186

  • Hughes W.O.H., Sumner S., Van Borm S. and Boomsma J.J. 2003. Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100: 9394-9397

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne R.L. 1986. The organization of work in Polybia occidentalis: costs and benefits of specialization in a social wasp. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 333-341

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R. and Fewell J.H. 2008. Influence of the social context on division of labor in ant foundress associations. Behav. Ecol. 19: 567-574

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R., Fewell J.H., Gorelick R. and Bertram S.M. 2007. Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 289-298

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R.A. 2000. Seed-harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of North America: an overview of ecology and biogeography. Sociobiology 36: 89-122 + 183-188

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones J.C., Myerscough M.R., Graham S. and Oldroyd B.P. 2004. Honey bee nest thermoregulation: diversity promotes stability. Science 305: 402-404

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian G.E. and Fewell J.H. 2004. Genetic variation and task specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant, Acromyrmex versicolor. Anim. Behav. 68: 1-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspari M. and Vargo E.L. 1995. Colony size as a buffer against seasonality: Bergmann’s rule in social insects. Am. Nat. 145: 610

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmes S.A. and Winston M.L. 1988. Division of labour among worker honey bees in demographically manipulated colonies. Insect. Soc. 35: 262-270

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkle D. and Middendorf M. 2004. Dynamic polyethism and competition for tasks in threshold reinforcement models of social insects. Adapt. Behav. 12: 251

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener C.D. 1974. The Social Behavior of the Bees: A Comparative Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Nakagawa S. 2004. A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav. Ecol. 15: 1044-1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Narum S.R. 2006. Beyond Bonferroni: less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv. Genet. 7: 783-787

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell S. and Foster R.L. 2001. Thresholds of response in nest thermoregulation by worker bumble bees, Bombus bifarius nearcticus (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ethology 107: 387-399

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd B.P. and Fewell J.H. 2007. Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 408-413

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster G.F. and Wilson E.O. 1978. Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

  • Overson R.P. 2011. Causes and consequences of multi-queen colonies in the California harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus. Dissertation, Arizona State University

  • Pacala S.W., Gordon D.M. and Godfray H.C.J. 1996. Effects of social group size on information transfer and task allocation. Evol. Ecol. 10: 127-165

    Google Scholar 

  • Page R.E. and Mitchell S.D. 1998. Self-organization and the evolution of division of labor. Apidologie 29: 171-190

    Google Scholar 

  • Pol R.G., de Casenave J.L., Feldhaar H., Milesi F.A. and Gadau J. 2008. Polyandry in two South American harvester ants. Insect. Soc. 55: 91-97

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravary F., Lecoutey E., Kaminski G., Châline N. and Jaisson P. 2007. Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Curr. Biol. 17: 1308-1312

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson E. 2009. Physiology as a caste-defining feature. Insect. Soc. 56: 1-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson G.E. 1992. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37: 637-665

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson G.E. and Page R.E. 1989. Genetic basis for division of labor in an insect society. In: The Genetics of Social Evolution (Breed M.D. and Page R.E., Eds), Westview, Boulder, CO. pp 61-80

  • Schmid-Hempel P., Winston M.L. and Ydenberg R.C. 1993. Foraging of individual workers in relation to colony state in the social Hymenoptera. Can. Entomol. 125: 129-160

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley T.D. 1995. The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Seid M.A. and Traniello J.F.A. 2006. Age-related repertoire expansion and division of labor in Pheidole dentata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new perspective on temporal polyethism and behavioral plasticity in ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60: 631-644

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C., Toth A., Suarez A. and Robinson G. 2008a. Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9: 735-748

  • Smith C.R., Anderson K.E., Tillberg C.V., Gadau J. and Suarez A.V. 2008b. Caste determination in a polymorphic social insect: nutritional, social, and genetic factors. Am. Nat. 172: 497-507

  • Snyder L.E. 1992. The genetics of social behavior in a polygynous ant. Naturwissenschaften 79: 525-527

    Google Scholar 

  • Theraulaz G., Bonabeau E. and Deneubourg J.L. 1998. Response threshold reinforcement and division of labour in insect societies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 265: 327-332

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas M.L. and Elgar M.A. 2003. Colony size affects division of labour in the ponerine ant Rhytidoponera metallica. Naturwissenschaften 90: 88-92

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello J.F.A. and Rosengaus R.B. 1997. Ecology, evolution and division of labour in social insects. Anim. Behav. 53: 209-213

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel W.R. 2006. The Fire Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Volny V.P. and Gordon D.M. 2002. Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the red harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2: 302-303

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmuller A. 2004. The control of nest climate in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) colonies: interindividual variability and self reinforcement in fanning response. Behav. Ecol. 15: 120-128

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler D.E. and Nijhout H.F. 1984. Soldier determination in Pheidole bicarinata: inhibition by adult soldiers. J. Insect Physiol. 30: 127-135

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E.O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Wilson E.O. 1983. Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). IV. Colony ontogeny of A. cephalotes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 55-60

  • Wilson E.O. 1985. The sociogenesis of insect colonies. Science 228: 1489-1495

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston M.L. and Fergusson L.A. 1985. The effect of worker loss on temporal caste structure in colonies of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Can. J. Zool. 63: 777-780

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Phil Barden for assistance in the lab and Jon Harrison, Bert Hölldobler, and Bob Johnson for intellectual contributions. Research was supported by the National Science Foundation (IOS-0446415 to J.H.F., IOS-1011180 to J.H.F. and C.T.H., and a Graduate Research Fellowship to C.T.H.), the Graduate and Professional Student Association, Arizona State University to C.T.H., and the School of Life Sciences Undergraduate Research Program, Arizona State University to T.H.E.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences and Center for Social Dynamics and Complexity, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    C. T. Holbrook, T. H. Eriksson, R. P. Overson, J. Gadau & J. H. Fewell

  2. Department of Biology, Lynchburg College, 1501 Lakeside Drive, Lynchburg, VA, 24501, USA

    C. T. Holbrook

Authors
  1. C. T. Holbrook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. H. Eriksson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. P. Overson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Gadau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. H. Fewell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. T. Holbrook.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holbrook, C.T., Eriksson, T.H., Overson, R.P. et al. Colony-size effects on task organization in the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus . Insect. Soc. 60, 191–201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0282-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0282-x

Keywords

search

Navigation