Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 207–214 | Cite as

A single origin of large colony size in allodapine bees suggests a threshold event among 50 million years of evolutionary tinkering

  • R. M. Dew
  • S. M. Rehan
  • S. M. Tierney
  • L. B. Chenoweth
  • M. P. Schwarz
Research Article


Evolutionary origins of highly eusocial organization involving morphological castes have been very rare, yet these origins have often led to enormous diversification and ecological success. This suggests that once an apparently severe selective barrier to highly eusocial behaviour is overcome, major new adaptive landscapes open up. One would therefore expect a discontinuity in patterns of evolutionary change across this barrier. However, we do not know if highly eusocial organization has evolved incrementally from less complex societies, or if it has involved some kind of evolutionary leap. Our study examines this issue using colony size data from 33 allodapine bee species, with a crown age of ca. 47 Mya. Our species cover all major allodapine clades, and include Exoneurella tridentata, the only known allodapine with morphologically discrete castes. Phylogenetic analyses indicate a strong effect of phylogeny on the evolution of maximum brood size, but the effect of phylogeny on maximum colony size (number of adults) depends on whether E. tridentata is excluded or included in analyses. We found no evidence of punctuational change in maximum colony or brood sizes over the phylogeny as a whole, but colony and brood sizes in E. tridentata fall well beyond variation among the other allodapines. Colony size in E. tridentata therefore represents an evolutionary outcome that does not fit within the kinds of incremental changes found in other allodapines. We propose that E. tridentata indicates the crossing of an important threshold, and this has entailed some very unusual ecological circumstances.


Eusociality Morphological castes Social evolution Allodapini Bees 



The authors would like to thank past and present members of the Schwarz lab for their assistance and support, including their previous work collecting gene sequences. This work was supported by Australian Research Council grants to MPS, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Post Graduate Scholarship to SMR and an Earl S Tupper Fellowship from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute to SMT.

Supplementary material

40_2011_206_MOESM1_ESM.doc (728 kb)
Table A1: Accession numbers for each gene sequence used in the phylogeny. Numbers listed as NA are not available. Table A2: Information on sample localities, sizes and protocols for species for which social data were based on unpublished data. Table A2: Information on sample localities, sizes and protocols for species for which social data were based on unpublished data (DOC 728 kb)


  1. Australian Bureau of Meteorology. 2011. Climate statistics for Australian locations, accessed 14 July 2011:
  2. Bull N.J., Schwarz M.P. and Cooper S.J.B. 2003. Phylogenetic divergence of the Australian allodapine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Mol. Phyl. Evol. 27: 212-222Google Scholar
  3. Cardinal S., Straka J. and Danforth B.N. 2010. Comprehensive phylogeny of apid bees reveals the evolutionary origins and antiquity of cleptoparasitism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107: 16207-16211Google Scholar
  4. Chenoweth L.B. and Schwarz M.P. 2011. Insights into the biogeographical origins and speciation history of the exoneurine Allodapine bees of Australia (Hymenoptera, Apidae). J. Biogeogr. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02488
  5. Chenoweth L.B., Tierney S.M., Smith J.A., Cooper S.J.B. and Schwarz M.P. 2007. Social complexity in bees is not sufficient to explain lack of reversions to sociality living over long time scales. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 246-255Google Scholar
  6. Hogendoorn K., Watiniasih N.L. and Schwarz M.P. 2001. Extended alloparental care in the almost solitary bee Exoneurella eremophila. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 275-282Google Scholar
  7. Houston T.F. 1976. New Australian allodapine bees (subgenus Exoneurella Michener) and their immatures (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 100: 15-28Google Scholar
  8. Huelsenbeck J.P. and Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Baysesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinforma. 17: 754-755Google Scholar
  9. Hurst P.S. 2001. Social biology of Exoneurella tridentata, an allodapine with morphological castes and perennial colonies. PhD thesis, School of Biological Sciences, The Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  10. Michener C.D. 2007. Bees of the World. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Michener C.D. 1971. Biologies of African allodapine bees (Hymenoptera, Xylocopinae). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 145: 117-301Google Scholar
  12. Neville T., Schwarz M.P. and Tierney S.M. 1998. Biology of a weakly social bee, Exoneura (Exoneurella) setosa (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and implications for social evolution in Australian allodapine bees. Aust. J. Zool. 46: 221-234Google Scholar
  13. Oster G.F. and Wilson E.O. 1978. Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Pagel M. and Meade A. 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167: 808-825Google Scholar
  15. Pagel M., Meade A. and Baker D. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53: 673-684Google Scholar
  16. Schwarz M.P., Fuller S., Tierney S.M. and Cooper S.J.B. 2006. Molecular phylogenetics of the exoneurine allodapine bees reveal an ancient and puzzling divergence from Africa to Australia. Syst. Biol. 55: 31-45Google Scholar
  17. Schwarz M.P., Richards M.H. and Danforth B.N. 2007. Changing paradigms in insect social evolution: new insights from halictine and allodapine bees. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52: 127-150Google Scholar
  18. Schwarz M.P., Tierney S.M., Cooper S.J.B. and Bull N.J. 2004. Molecular phylogenetics of the allodapine bee genus Braunsapis: A-T bias and heterogenous substitution parameters. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 32: 110-122Google Scholar
  19. Schwarz M.P., Tierney S., Rehan S., Chenoweth L. and Cooper S. 2011. The evolution of eusociality in bees: workers began by waiting. Biol. Lett. 7: 277-280Google Scholar
  20. Schwarz M.P., Tierney S.M., Zammit J., Schwarz M.P. and Fuller S. 2005. Brood provisioning and colony composition of a malagasy species of Halterapis: implications for social evolution in the allodapine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Xylocopinae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 98: 126-133Google Scholar
  21. Szathmary E. and Maynard-Smith J. 1995. The major evolutionary transitions. Nature 374: 227-232Google Scholar
  22. Tierney S.M., Smith J.A., Chenoweth L. and Schwarz M.P. 2008. Phylogenetics of allodapine bees: a review of social evolution, parasitism and biogeography. Apidologie 39: 3-15Google Scholar
  23. Watiniasih N.L. 1998. Life cycle and social behaviour of an Australian allodapine bee Exoneurella eremophila Houston (Apidae: Allodapini). MSc thesis, School of Biological Sciences, The Flinders University of South Australia, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilson E.O. 2008. One giant leap: How insects achieved altruism and colonial life. BioScience 58: 17-25Google Scholar
  25. Zammit J., Hogendoorn K. and Schwarz M.P. 2008. Strong constraints to independent nesting in a facultatively social bee: quantifying the pressure posed by enemies-at-the-nest. Insect. Soc. 55: 74-78Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Dew
    • 1
  • S. M. Rehan
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. M. Tierney
    • 3
  • L. B. Chenoweth
    • 1
  • M. P. Schwarz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences, The Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford ParkAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesBrock University, Glenridge Ave., St. CatharinesOntarioCanada
  3. 3.Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado PostalBalboaRepublic of Panama

Personalised recommendations