Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recruitment in starved nests: the role of direct and indirect interactions between scouts and nestmates in the ant Lasius niger

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In social insects, the foraging activity usually increases with the length of food deprivation. In Lasius niger, a mass-recruiting ant species, the foraging adjustment to the level of food deprivation is regulated by the scout that fed at the food source and by the response of the nestmates to signals performed by the scout inside the nest. In this study, we look at the role of these direct interactions (antennations or trophallaxes) and indirect interactions (pheromonal emission) and how they are influenced by the level of food deprivation. At the beginning of recruitment, the relative number of nestmates leaving the nest to forage increases with the level of deprivation. The nestmates’ propensity to exit the nest is not influenced by a previous trophallactic and/or antennal contact with a scout. Our results strongly suggest that the exit of nestmates is triggered by a chemical signal emitted by a scout. Deprivation lowers the response threshold of nestmates to this chemical signal resulting in a more important exit from the nest. Surprisingly, 27% of starved nestmates that receive food from the scout relay the information by depositing a chemical signal before having discovered and drunk the food source. Both phenomena boost the recruitment process. Though successful foragers returning to the nest have a significant role in the recruitment to the food source, we observed that the response of the nestmates inside the nest also greatly influence regulation of the foraging activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson C. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 1999. Task partitioning in insect societies. I. Effect of colony size on queueing delay and colony ergonomic efficiency. Am. Nat. 154: 521-535

    Google Scholar 

  • Auclair J.L. 1963. Aphid feeding and nutrition. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 8: 439-489

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckers R., Deneubourg J.-L. and Goss S. 1993. Modulation of trail-laying in the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source. J. Insect Behav. 6: 751-759

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroni-Urbani C., Buser M.W. and Schilliger E. 1988. Substrate vibration during recruitment in ant social organization. Insect. Soc. 35: 241-250

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffin A., Denis D., Van Simaeys G., Goldman S. and Deneubourg J.-L. 2009. Feeding and stocking up: radio-labelled food reveals exchange patterns in ants. Plos One 4: e5919

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartar R.V. and Dill L.M. 1990. Why are bumblebees risk sensitive foragers? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 121-127

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassill D.L. 2003. Rules of supply and demand regulate recruitment to food in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54: 441-450

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassill D.L. and Tschinkel W.R. 1999a. Information flow during social feeding in ant societies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 255-261

  • Cassill D.L. and Tschinkel W.R. 1999b. Regulation of diet in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. J. Insect Behav. 12: 307-328

  • Cook S.C., Eubanks M.D., Gold R.E. and Behmer S.T. 2010. Colony-level macronutrient regulation in ants: mechanisms, hoarding and associated costs. Anim. Behav. 79: 429-437

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosens D. and Toussaint N. 1986. The dynamic nature of the activities of the wood ant Formica aquilonia foraging to static food resource within a laboratory habitat. Physiol. Entomol. 11: 383-395

    Google Scholar 

  • Devigne C. and Detrain C. 2002. Collective exploration and area making in the ant Lasius niger. Insect. Soc. 49: 357-362

    Google Scholar 

  • De Biseau J.C. and Pasteels J.M. 1994. Regulated food recruitment through individual behavior of scouts in the ant, Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Insect Behav. 7: 767-777

    Google Scholar 

  • De Biseau J.C. and Pasteels J.M. 2000. Response thresholds to recruitment signals and the regulation of foraging intensity in the ant Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behav. Proc. 48: 137-148

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marco R.J. 2006. How bees tune their dancing according to their colony’s nectar influx: re-examining the role of the food-receivers’ ‘eagerness’. J. Exp. Biol. 209: 421-432

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussutour A. and Simpson S.J. 2009. Communal nutrition in ants. Curr. Biol. 19: 740-744

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina W.M. and Grüter C. 2009. Trophallaxis – a mechanism of information transfer. In: Food Exploitation by Social Insects: Ecological, Behavioral, and Theoretical Approaches (Hrncir M. and Jarau S., Eds). Boca Raton, CRC Press. pp 173-187

  • Gotceitas V. and Godin J.-G. 2004. Foraging under the risk of predation in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): effects of social status and hunger. Anim. Behav. 67: 1083-1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart A.G. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 2001. Task partitioning, division of labour and nest compartmentalisation collectively isolate hazardous waste in the leafcutting ant Atta cephalotes. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 387-392

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. 1971. Recruitment behavior in Camponotus socius (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Z. Vergl. Physiol. 75: 123-142

  • Hölldobler B. 1985. Liquid food transmission and antennation signals in ponerine ants. Isr. J. Entomol. 14: 89-99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Harvard Univ. Press Cambridge, MA. 732 pp

  • Howard D.F. and Tschinkel W.R. 1980. The effect of colony size and deprivation on food flow in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7: 293-300

    Google Scholar 

  • Josens R.B. and Roces F. 2000. Foraging in the ant Camponotus mus: nectar-intake and crop filling depend on colony deprivation. J. Insect Physiol. 46: 1103-1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan I. and Eubanks M. 2005. Aphids alter the community-wide impact of fire ants. Ecology 86: 1640-1649

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir A. 1979. Le comportement alimentaire et la division du travail chez la fourmi Lasius niger. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 113: 79-314

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefke C., Hölldober B. and Maschwitz U. 2001. Recruitment behavior in the ant genus Polyrhachis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J. Insect Behav. 14: 637-659

  • Mc Cabe S., Farina W.M. and Josens R.B. 2006. Antennation of nectar-receivers encodes colony needs and food-source profitability in the ant Camponotus mus. Insect. Soc. 53: 356-361

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailleux A.-C., Detrain C. and Deneubourg J.-L. 2003. Regulation of ants’ foraging to resource productivity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 1609-1616

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailleux A.-C., Detrain C. and Deneubourg J.-L. 2006. Deprivation drives a threshold triggering communication. J. Exp. Biol. 209: 4224-4229

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailleux A.-C., Detrain C. and Deneubourg J.-L. 2010. Impact of starvation on Lasius niger exploration. Ethology 116: 248-256

  • Nonacs P. and Dill L.M. 1990. Mortality risk vs food quality trade-offs in a common currency: ant patch preferences. Ecology 71: 1886-1892

    Google Scholar 

  • Portha S., Deneubourg J.-L. and Detrain C. 2002 Self-organized asymmetries in ant foraging: a functional response to food type and colony needs. Behav. Ecol. 13: 776-781

    Google Scholar 

  • Roces F. and Nuñez J.A. 1993. Information about food quality influences load-size selection in recruited leaf-cutting ants. Anim. Behav. 45: 135-143

    Google Scholar 

  • Roces F. and Hölldobler B. 1996. Use of stridulation in foraging leaf cutting ants: Mechanical support during cutting or short range recruitment signal? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39: 293-299

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakata H. 1995. Density-dependant predation of the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on two attended aphids Lachnus tropicallis and Myzocallis kuricola (Homoptera: Aphididae). Res. Popul. Ecol. 37: 159-164

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer R.J., Holmes S. and Gordon D.M. 2006. Forager activation and food availability in harvester ants. Anim. Behav. 71: 815-822

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz D.J., Huang Z.Y. and Robinson G.E. 1998. Effects of colony food shortage on behavioural development in honeybees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 295-303

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz D.J., Vermiglio M.J., Huang Z.Y. and Robinson G.E. 2002. Effects of colony food shortage on social action in honeybees. Insect. Soc. 49: 50-55

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley T.D. 1989. Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony’s nutritional status. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 181-199

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendova-Franks A.B., Hayward R.K., Wulf B., Klimek T., James R., Planque R., Britton N.F. and Franks N.R. 2010. Emergency networking: famine relief in ant colonies. Anim. Behav. 79: 473-485

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth P.T. and Moore A.J. 2004. Signaling of hunger when offspring forage by both begging and self-feeding. Anim. Behav. 67: 1083-1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens D.W. and Krebs J.R. 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA. 247 pp

  • Stuart R.J. and Moffett M.W. 1994. Recruitment communication and pheromone trails in the Neotropical ants, Leptothorax (Nesomyrmex) spininodis and L (N.). echinatinodis. Experientia 50: 850-852

  • Szlep-Fessel R. 1970. The regulatory mechanism in mass foraging and the recruitment of soldiers Pheidole. Insect. Soc. 17: 233-244

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudd J.H. and Sudd M.E. 1985. Seasonal changes in the response of wood-ants (Formica lugubris) to sucrose baits. Ecol. Entomol. 10: 89-97

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello J.F. 1977. Resource assessment, recruitment behavior,and organization of cooperative prey retrieval in the ant Formica schaufussi (Hymenoptera). J. Insect Behav. 11: 1-22

    Google Scholar 

  • Theraulaz G., Gervet J. and Semenoff Tian-Chanski S. 1991. Social regulation of foraging activities in Polistes dominulus Christ: a systemic approach to behavioural organization. Behaviour 116: 292-320

  • Toth A.L., Kantarovitch S., Meisel A.F. and Robinson G.E. 2005. Nutritional status influences socially regulated foraging ontogeny in honey bees. J. Exp. Biol. 208: 4641-4649

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl W., Woodring J., Fisher M., Lorenz M.W. and Hoffmann K.H. 1999. Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences. Oecologia 118: 483-491

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis D.I. 1962. The relation between hunger, activity and worker function in an ant colony. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. B 139: 589-605

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler W.M. 1910. The Ants. Their Structure, Development and Behaviour. New York: Columbia University Press. 663 pp

  • Wilson E.O. 1962. Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith) 1. The organization of mass-foraging. Anim. Behav. 10: 134-147

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A. Buffin is a F.R.I.A. researcher (Formation pour la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture). C. Detrain and J.L. Deneubourg are research associates from the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research and were financially supported by the Fund for Joint Basic Research (Grant 2.4510.01). A.C. Mailleux is financially supported by the Institut d’encouragement de la Recherche Scientifique et de l’Innovation de Bruxelles. This is publication BRC158 of the Biodiversity Research Centre at Université Catholique de Louvain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of Ecology and Biogeography, Catholic University of Louvain, Croix du Sud 4-5 (Carnoy), 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    A.-C. Mailleux

  2. Service d’Ecologie Sociale, Université libre de Bruxelles, CP231, Avenue F. D. Roosevelt, 50, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    A. Buffin, C. Detrain & J.-L. Deneubourg

Authors
  1. A.-C. Mailleux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Buffin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Detrain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J.-L. Deneubourg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A.-C. Mailleux.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mailleux, AC., Buffin, A., Detrain, C. et al. Recruitment in starved nests: the role of direct and indirect interactions between scouts and nestmates in the ant Lasius niger . Insect. Soc. 58, 559–567 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0177-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0177-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation