Advertisement

Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 539–549 | Cite as

Colony demographics of rare soldier-polymorphic worker caste systems in Pheidole ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)

  • M. H. Huang
  • D. E. Wheeler
Research Article

Abstract

Nearly all species in the ant genus Pheidole have dimorphic workers, with distinct small minors and larger soldiers. The size range of both castes is typically narrow. Just seven described species are soldier-polymorphic, with a broad soldier size range. Here, we characterize worker caste allocation and demography in the soldier-polymorphic P. obtusospinosa, P. rhea, and P. tepicana, and the dimorphic P. spadonia for comparison. The head allometry of soldiers in soldier-polymorphic species is strongly positive and that of dimorphic species is negative. Among soldier-polymorphic species, the soldier castes differ from each other in the degree of positive allometry. In addition, they differ in the number of size modes: P. obtusospinosa and P. rhea have two and P. tepicana has one. During colony ontogeny, P. obtusospinosa first has one mode and develops the second mode much later, while P. rhea produces multiple modes throughout. We also characterize worker caste systems based on the biomass allocation. For all three soldier-polymorphic species, the majority of soldiers are small soldiers. Pheidole obtusospinosa and P. rhea allocate roughly equal biomass to the two soldier classes, while P. tepicana allocates little to supersoldiers based on both biomass and caste ratio. These findings illustrate the interplay among caste ratios, biomass allocation, size frequency distributions, and allometry in the evolution of different worker caste systems. We conclude that soldier-polymorphic species may have evolved convergently in response to broad-scale factors, but differences among them suggest selection pressures in small-scale environments have been different.

Keywords

Allometry Biomass allocation Caste ratio Colony ontogeny Competitive displacement Worker polymorphism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Anna Dornhaus, Yves Carriere, Jennifer Jandt and Anna Himler for their feedback on our manuscript and statistical advice. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback on an earlier version of our manuscript. We also thank K. Franklin for helping us identify some of our dimorphic Pheidole specimens.

Supplementary material

40_2011_176_MOESM1_ESM.doc (109 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 1 (DOC 109 kb)
40_2011_176_MOESM2_ESM.doc (48 kb)
Supplementary Table 1 (DOC 47 kb)

References

  1. ANTWEB. 2010a. World catalog of Pheidole (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). http://www.antweb.org/description.do?name=pheidole&rank=genus&project=worldants. Accessed 14 September 2010
  2. ANTWEB. 2010b. Bolton world catalog ants. http://www.antweb.org/world.jsp. Accessed 02 October 2010
  3. Calabi P. and Traniello J.F.A. 1989. Social organization in the ant Pheidole dentata: physical and temporal caste ratios lack ecological correlates. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 69-78Google Scholar
  4. Cerdá X. and Retana J. 1998. Interference interactions and nest usurpation between two subordinate ant species. Oecologia 113: 577-583Google Scholar
  5. Dejean A. and Lachaud J.-P. 1992. Growth-related changes in predation behavior in incipient colonies of the ponerine ant Ectatomma tuberculatum (Olivier). Insect. Soc. 39: 129-143Google Scholar
  6. Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Von Zuben C.J., Fowler H.G., Schlindwein M.N. and Bueno O.C. 1994. Multivariate morphometrics and allometry in a polymorphic ant. Insect. Soc. 41: 153-163Google Scholar
  7. Farji-Brener A.G., Barrantes G. and Ruggiero A. 2004. Environmental rugosity, body size and access to food: a test of the size-grain hypothesis in tropical litter ants. OIKOS 104: 165-171Google Scholar
  8. Feener Jr. D.H., Lighton J.R.B. and Bartholomew G.A. 1988. Curvilinear allometry, energetics and foraging ecology: a comparison of leaf-cutting ants and army ants. Funct. Ecol. 2: 509-520Google Scholar
  9. Fenchel T. 1975. Character displacement and coexistence in mud snails (Hydrobiidae). Oecologia 20:19-32Google Scholar
  10. Fjerdingstad E.J. and Crozier R.H. 2006. The evolution of worker caste diversity in social insects. Am. Nat. 167: 390-400Google Scholar
  11. Franks N.R. 1985. Reproduction, foraging efficiency and worker polymorphism in army ants. In: Experimental Behavioral Ecology (Hölldobler B. and Lindauer M., Eds), Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. pp 91-107Google Scholar
  12. Grace J.B. and Wetzel R.G. 1981. Habitat partitioning and competitive displacement in cattails (Typha): experimental field studies. Am. Nat. 118: 463-474Google Scholar
  13. Haering R. and Fox B.J. 1987. Short-term coexistence and long-term competitive displacement of two dominant species of Iridomyrmex: the successional response of ants to regenerating habitats. J. Anim. Ecol. 56: 495-507Google Scholar
  14. Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 732 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang M.H. 2010. Multi-phase defense by the big-headed ant Pheidole obtusospinosa against raiding army ants. J. Insect Sci. doi: insectscience.org/10.1
  16. Hughes W.O.H., Sumner S., Van Borm S. and Boomsma J.J. 2003. Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100: 9394-9397Google Scholar
  17. Mertl A.L. and Traniello J.F.A. 2009. Behavioral evolution in the major worker subcaste of twig-nesting Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): does morphological specialization influence task plasticity? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63: 1411-1426Google Scholar
  18. Moffett M.W. 1987. Division of labor and diet in the extremely polymorphic ant Pheidologeton diversus. Natl. Geogr. Res. 3: 282-304Google Scholar
  19. Moreau C.S. 2008. Unraveling the evolutionary history of the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48: 224-239Google Scholar
  20. Passera L. 1977. The production of soldiers in colonies coming out of hibernation in the ant Pheidole pallidula. Insect. Soc. 24: 131-146Google Scholar
  21. Passera L., Roncin E., Kaufmann B. and Keller L. 1996. Increased soldier production in ant colonies exposed to intraspecific competition. Nature 379: 630-631Google Scholar
  22. Pie M.R. and Traniello J.F.A. 2007. Morphological evolution in a hyperdiverse clade: the ant genus Pheidole. J. Zool. 271: 99-109Google Scholar
  23. Rheindt F.E., Strehl C.P. and Gadau J. 2005. A genetic component in the determination of worker polymorphism in the Florida harvester ant Pogonomyrmex badius. Insect. Soc. 52: 163-168Google Scholar
  24. Schöning C., Kinuthia W. and Franks N.R. 2005. Evolution of allometries in the worker caste of Dorylus army ants. OIKOS 110: 231-240Google Scholar
  25. Tschinkel W.R. 1987. Seasonal life history and nest architecture of a winter-active ant, Prenolepis imparis. Insect. Soc. 34: 143-164Google Scholar
  26. Tschinkel W.R. 1993. Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta during one annual cycle. Ecol. Monogr. 63: 425-457Google Scholar
  27. Wheeler D.E. 1991. The developmental basis of worker caste polymorphism in ants. Am. Nat. 138: 1218-1238Google Scholar
  28. Wheeler D.E. and Nijhout H.F. 1983. Soldier determination in Pheidole bicarinata: effect of methoprene on caste and size within castes. J. Insect Physiol. 29: 847-854Google Scholar
  29. Wheeler D.E. and Nijhout H.F. 1984. Soldier determination in Pheidole bicarinata: inhibition by adult soldiers. J. Insect. Physiol. 30: 127-135Google Scholar
  30. Wilson E.O. 1953. The origin and evolution of polymorphism in ants. Q. Rev. Biol. 28: 136-156Google Scholar
  31. Wilson E.O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 548 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilson E.O. 1980. Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta): I. The overall pattern in A. sexdens. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7: 143-156Google Scholar
  33. Wilson E.O. 1983. Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 55-60Google Scholar
  34. Wilson E.O. 1984. The relation between caste ratios and division of labor in the ant genus Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 89-98Google Scholar
  35. Wilson E.O. 2003. Pheidole in the New World: a Dominant, Hyperdiverse Ant Genus. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 794 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood L.A. and Tschinkel W.R. 1981. Quantification and modification of worker size variation in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Insect. Soc. 28: 117-128Google Scholar
  37. Yang A.S., Martin C.H. and Nijhout H.F. 2004. Geographical variation of caste structure among ant populations. Curr. Biol. 14: 514-519Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations