Advertisement

Insectes Sociaux

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 465–475 | Cite as

Dominance hierarchy among workers changes with colony development in Polistes japonicus (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) paper wasp colonies with a small number of workers

  • Y. Ishikawa
  • Y. Y. Yamada
  • M. Matsuura
  • M. Tsukada
  • K. Tsuchida
Research Article

Abstract

Dominance hierarchy in the primitively eusocial wasp Polistes japonicus was analysed in four colonies for two periods: (1) the first-brood period, when only early emerging workers are present on the nest, and (2) the mixed-brood period, when the first and second (last) broods are present on the nest. The rank in the dominance hierarchy was determined based on a sociogram showing a dominance–subordinance relationship for all pairs of workers. During the first-brood period, older workers were likely to be more dominant (older dominance hierarchy), while the rank of workers was reversed during the mixed-brood period, with younger workers being likely to be more dominant (younger dominance hierarchy). However, the oldest and youngest workers were not always the top-ranked workers in the dominance hierarchy during the first- and mixed-brood periods, respectively, and during the mixed-brood period no younger dominance hierarchy was evident when the first or second brood was analysed separately. Higher ranked workers displayed dominance behaviour more frequently, and the lowest ranked worker hardly displayed dominance behaviour. Most workers displayed dominance behaviours primarily towards the worker ranked immediately below in the dominance hierarchy during the mixed-brood period but not during the first-brood period. The bodies of younger workers were larger for the mixed brood, but not for the first brood in some colonies or the second brood in all colonies. The association between body size and rank in the dominance hierarchy was negative during the first-brood period and positive during the mixed-brood period, with a nearly significant trend also seen even when the analysis was limited to the second brood. To explain the above temporal change from an older dominance hierarchy to a younger dominance hierarchy, we propose the hypothesis that the probability of a worker inheriting the colony increases rapidly with colony development, and consequently younger larger workers attempt to move up the dominance hierarchy in order to produce their own offspring by becoming the superseder late in colony development, rather than working harmoniously so as to boost the overall production of reproductive progeny for a colony, which is the strategy adopted early in colony development.

Keywords

Emergence order Dominance hierarchy Polistella Polistinae Social wasps 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Arévalo E., Zhu Y., Carpenter J.M. and Strassmann J.E. 2004. The phylogeny of the social wasp subfamily Polistinae: evidence from microsatellite flanking sequences, mitochondrial COI sequence, and morphological characters. BMC Evol. Biol. 4: 8Google Scholar
  2. Bourke A.F.G. 1999. Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 245-257Google Scholar
  3. Bridge C. and Field J. 2007. Queuing for dominance: gerontocracy and queue-jumping in the hover wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 1253-1259Google Scholar
  4. Bruyndonckx N., Kardile S.P. and Gadagkar R. 2006. Dominance behaviour and regulation of foraging in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata (Lep.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav. Proc. 72: 100-103Google Scholar
  5. Cant M.A. and Field J. 2001. Helping effort and future fitness in cooperative animal societies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1959-1964Google Scholar
  6. Cant M.A. and Field J. 2005. Helping effort in a dominance hierarchy. Behav. Ecol. 16: 708-715Google Scholar
  7. Cant M.A., Llop J.B. and Field J. 2006. Individual variation in social aggression and the probability of inheritance: theory and a field test. Am. Nat. 167: 837-852Google Scholar
  8. Dew H.E. and Michener C.D. 1981. Division of labor among workers of Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): Laboratory foraging activities. Insect. Soc. 28: 87-101Google Scholar
  9. Downing H.A. and Jeanne R.L. 1985. Communication of status in the social wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 67: 78-96Google Scholar
  10. Field J., Cronin A. and Bridge C. 2006. Future fitness and helping in social queues. Nature 441: 214-217Google Scholar
  11. Field J. and Cant M. 2006. Helping effort in primitively eusocial wasps. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 43: 481-487Google Scholar
  12. Finkel T. and Holbrook N.J. 2000. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 408: 239-247Google Scholar
  13. Gadagkar R. 1980. Dominance hierarchy and division of labour in the social wasp Ropalidia marginata (Lep.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Curr. Sci. 49: 772-775Google Scholar
  14. Gadagkar R. and Joshi N.V. 1982. Behaviour of the Indian social wasp Ropalidia cyathiformis on a nest of separate combs (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Zool. London 198: 27-37Google Scholar
  15. Gadakar R. 1987. Social structure and the determinants of queen status in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia cyathiformis. In: Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects (Eder J. and Rembold H., Eds), Verlag J. Peperny, München. pp 377-378Google Scholar
  16. Gamboa G.J., Wacker T.L., Scope J.A., Cornell T.J. and Shellman-Reeve J. 1990. The mechanism of queen regulation of foraging by workers in paper wasps (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ethology 85: 335-343Google Scholar
  17. Heinsohn R. and Legge S. 1999. The cost of helping. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 53-57Google Scholar
  18. Higashi S., Ito F., Sugiura N. and Ohkawara K. 1994. Worker’s age regulates the linear dominance hierarchy in the queenless ponerine ant, Pachycondyla sublaevis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim. Behav. 47: 179-184Google Scholar
  19. van Honk C.G.J., Röseler P.-F., Velthuis H.H.W. and Hoogeveen J.C. 1981. Factors influencing the egg laying of workers in a captive Bombus terrestris colony. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9: 9-14Google Scholar
  20. Hughes C.R. and Strassmann J.E. 1988. Age is more important than size in determining dominance among workers in the primitively eusocial wasp, Polistes instabilis. Behaviour 107: 1-15Google Scholar
  21. Iwahashi O. 1989. Society of Ropalidia fasciata. In: Society of Ropalidia Wasps (Iwahashi O. and Yamane S., Eds), Tôkai University Press, Tokyo. pp 3-209 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  22. Jeanne R.L. 1972. Social biology of the neotropical wasp Mischocyttarus drewseni. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 144: 63-150Google Scholar
  23. Klahn J.E. 1981. Alternative reproductive tactics of single foundresses of a social wasp, Polistes fuscatus. PhD thesis, University of IowaGoogle Scholar
  24. Litte M. 1977. Behavioral ecology of the social wasp, Mischocyttarus mexicanus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2: 229-246Google Scholar
  25. Litte M. 1979. Mischocyttarus flavitarsis in Arizona: social and nesting biology of a polistine wasp. Z. Tierpsychol. 50: 282-312Google Scholar
  26. Matsuura M. 1995. General remarks on the Japanese social wasps: Polistinae. In: Social Wasps of Japan in Color. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo. pp 309-322 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  27. Maynard Smith J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 224 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Michener C.D. 1974. The Social Behavior of the Bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 404 ppGoogle Scholar
  29. Miyano S. 1986. Colony development, worker behavior and male production in orphan colonies of a Japanese paper wasp, Polistes chinensis antennalis Pérez (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Res. Popul. Ecol. 28: 347-361Google Scholar
  30. Molina Y. and O’Donnell S. 2009. Worker reproductive competition affects division of labor in a primitively social paperwasp (Polistes instabilis). Insect. Soc. 56: 14-20Google Scholar
  31. Monnin T. and Peeters C. 1999. Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. Behav. Ecol. 10: 323-332Google Scholar
  32. Nilsson J.-Å. 2002. Metabolic consequences of hard work. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 269: 1735-1739Google Scholar
  33. O’Donnell S. 1998. Dominance and polyethism in the eusocial wasp Mischocyttarus mastigophorus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43: 327-331Google Scholar
  34. O’Donnell S. 2001. Worker age, ovary development, and temporal polyethism in the swarm-founding wasp Polybia occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J. Insect Behav. 14: 201-213Google Scholar
  35. Ono M. 1989. Multiple-comb nest foundation by a single inseminated worker of the temperate paper wasp, Polistes snelleni Saussure (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). J. Ethol. 7: 57-58Google Scholar
  36. Page R.E., Post D.C. and Metcalf R.A. 1989. Satellite nests, early males, and plasticity of reproductive behavior in a paper wasp. Am. Nat. 134: 731-748Google Scholar
  37. Pardi L. 1948. Dominance order in Polistes wasps. Physiol. Zool. 21: 1-13Google Scholar
  38. Reeve H.K. 1991. Polistes. In: The social biology of wasps (Ross K.G. and Matthews R.W., Eds), Comstock Publishing Associates, A division of Cornell University Press, London. pp 99-148Google Scholar
  39. Reeve H.K. and Gamboa G.J. 1983. Colony activity integration in primitively eusocial wasps: the role of the queen (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13: 63-74Google Scholar
  40. Reeve H.K. and Gamboa G.J. 1987. Queen regulation of worker foraging in paper wasps: a social feedback control system (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behaviour 102: 147-167Google Scholar
  41. Shreeves G. and Field J. 2002. Group size and direct fitness in social queues. Am. Nat. 159: 81-95Google Scholar
  42. Spradbery J.P. 1991. Evolution of queen number and queen control. In: The Social Biology of Wasps (Ross K.G. and Matthews R.W., Eds), Comstock Publishing Associates, A division of Cornell University Press, London. pp 336-388Google Scholar
  43. Strassmann J.E. 1981. Evolutionary implications of early male and satellite nest production in Polistes exclamans colony cycles. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 8: 55-64Google Scholar
  44. Strassmann J.E. and Meyer D.C. 1983. Gerontocracy in the social wasp, Polistes exclamans. Anim. Behav. 31: 431-438Google Scholar
  45. Suzuki T. 1985. Mating and laying of female-producing eggs by orphaned workers of a paper wasp, Polistes snelleni (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 78: 736-739Google Scholar
  46. Suzuki T. 1997. Worker mating in queen-right colonies of a temperate paper wasp. Naturwissenschaften 84: 304-305Google Scholar
  47. Suzuki T. 2003. Queen replacement without gerontocracy in the paper wasp Parapolybia indica in temperate Japan. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 15: 191-196Google Scholar
  48. Tsuchida K. and Suzuki T. 2006. Conflict over sex ratio and male production in paper wasps. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 43: 468-480Google Scholar
  49. Tsuji K. and Tsuji N. 2005. Why is dominance hierarchy age-related in social insects? The relative longevity hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58: 517-526Google Scholar
  50. West-Eberhard M.J. 1969. The social biology of Polistine wasps. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 140: 1-140Google Scholar
  51. West-Eberhard M.J. 1978. Temporary queens in Metapolybia wasps: non-reproductive helpers without altruism? Science 200: 441-443Google Scholar
  52. West-Eberhard M.J. 1981. Intragroup selection and the evolution of insect societies. In: Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Research and New Theory. Chirion Press, New York. pp 3-17Google Scholar
  53. Williams J.B, Roberts S.P. and Elekonich M.M. 2008. Age and natural metabolically-intensive behavior affect oxidative stress and antioxidant mechanisms. Exp. Gerontol. 43: 538-549Google Scholar
  54. Wilson E.O. 1974. Group effects and the control of nestmates. In: The Insect Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. pp 296-305Google Scholar
  55. Yamane S. 1986. The colony life cycle of the Sumatran paper wasp Ropalidia (Icariola) variegata jacobsoni (Buysson). With reference to the possible occurrence of serial polygyny (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Monit. Zool. Ital. 20: 135-161Google Scholar
  56. Yoshikawa K. 1956. Compound nest experiments in Polistes fadwigae dalla Torre. Ecological studies of Polistes wasps. IV. J. Insect Polytech. Osaka City Univ. 7: 229-243Google Scholar
  57. Yoshikawa K. 1963. Introductory studies on the life economy of polistine wasps. II. Super individual stage 2. Division of labor among workers. Jpn. J. Ecol. 13: 53-57Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for the Study of Social Insects (IUSSI) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Ishikawa
    • 1
  • Y. Y. Yamada
    • 1
  • M. Matsuura
    • 1
  • M. Tsukada
    • 1
  • K. Tsuchida
    • 2
  1. 1.Insect Ecology Laboratory, Graduate School of BioresourcesMie UniversityTsuJapan
  2. 2.Laboratory of Insect Ecology, Faculty of Applied Biological SciencesGifu UniversityGifuJapan

Personalised recommendations