Skip to main content
Log in

Hypogaeic pitfall traps: methodological advances and remarks to improve the sampling of a hidden ant fauna

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ant assemblages present a great vertical stratification, with microhabitats showing strong differences in relation to species composition. Among the microhabitats, the hypogaeic has been poorly studied. Hypogaeic or subterranean ants live in the deeper soil layers, which make the sampling logistics and operability a difficult work. The fact that the hypogaeic ant fauna is diversified and abundant, with low similarity to ant assemblages in other microhabitats, has promoted the development of several collecting techniques to sample this hidden ant fauna. Here, we verify the ability of hypogaeic pitfall traps to sample subterranean ants. In addition, we propose methodological advances and remarks about the use of this ant sampling technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agosti D. and Johnson N.F. 2005. Antbase. World Wide Web Electronic Publication. antbase.org, version (05/2005), Accessed 25 Jan. 2010

  • Agosti D., Majer J.D., Alonso L.E., and Schultz T.R. 2000. Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 280 pp

  • Berghoff S.M., Maschwitz U. and Linsenmair K.E. 2003a. Hypogaeic and epigaeic ant diversity on Borneo: evaluation of baited sieve buckets as a study method. Trop. Zool. 16: 153-163

  • Berghoff S.M., Maschwitz U. and Linsenmair K.E. 2003b. Influence of the hypogeic army Dorylus (Dichthadia) laevigatus on tropical arthrop communities. Oecologia 135: 149-157

  • Berghoff S.M., Weissflog A., Linsenmair K.E., Hashim, R. and Maschwitz U. 2002. Foraging of a hypogaeic army ant: a long neglected majority. Insect. Soc. 49: 133-141

    Google Scholar 

  • Bestelmeyer B.T., Agosti D., Alonso L.E., Brandão C.R.F., Brown W.L., Delabie J.H.C. and Silvestre R. 2000. Field techniques for the study of ground dwelling ants. An overview, description, and evaluation. In: Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity (Agosti D., Majer J.D., Alonso L.E. and Schultz T.R., Eds), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington London, pp 122-144

  • Bolton B. 1994. Identification Guide to the Ant Genera of the World. Harvard University Press, Cambridge London, 222 pp

  • Bolton B. 2003. Synopsis and Classification of Formicidae. Mem. Am. Entomol. Inst., Gainesville. 370 pp

  • Brandão C.R.F., Feitosa R.M., Schmidt F.A. and Solar R.R.C. 2008. Rediscovery of Simopelta minima (Brandão) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), with a discussion on rarity and conservation of ant species. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 52: 480-483

    Google Scholar 

  • Delabie J.H.C. and Fowler H.G. 1995. Soil and litter cryptic ant assemblages of Bahian cocoa plantations. Pedobiol. 39: 423-433

    Google Scholar 

  • Elisson A.M., Record S., Arguello A. and Gotelli N.J. 2007. Rapid inventory of the ant assemblage in a temperate hardwood forest: species composition and assessment of sampling methods. Environ. Entomol. 36: 766-775

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler H.C. and Delabie J.H.C. 1995. Resource partitioning among epigaeic and hypogaeic ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of a Brazilian cocoa plantation. Ecol. Austral. 5: 117-124

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler H.C., Delabie J.H.C. and Moutinho P.R.S. 2000. Hypogaeic and epigaeic ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) assemblages of Atlantic costal rainforest and dry mature and secondary Amazon forest in Brazil: Continuums or communities. Trop. Ecol. 41: 73-80

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundação Centro Tecnológico de Minas Gerais—CETEC. 1983. Diagnóstico ambiental do estado de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte. 158 pp

  • Greenslade P. and Greenslade P.J.M. 1971. The use of baits and preservatives in pitfall traps. J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 10: 253-260

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge 732 pp

  • IBGE. 2004. Mapas de Biomas do Brasil. (ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Cartas_e_Mapas/Mapas_Murais/), Accessed 26 Oct. 2006.

  • Lobry de Bruyn L.A. 1999. Ants as bioindicators of soil function in rural environments. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 425-441

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay W.P. 1996. A revision of the ant genus Acanthostichus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 27: 129-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • MMA. 2007. Lista Nacional das Espécies da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçadas de Extinção. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. (http://www.mma.gov.br/port/sbf/fauna/index.cfm), Accessed 17 Aug. 2007

  • Oliveira P.S. and Del-Claro K. 2005. Multitrophic interactions in a neotropical savanna: ant-hemipteran systems, associated insect herbivores and host plant. In: Biotic Interactions in the Tropics: Their Role in the Maintenance of Species Diversity (Burslem D.F.R.P., Pinard M.A. and Hartley S.E., Eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp 414-438

  • Olson D.M. 1991. A comparison of the efficacy of litter sifting and pitfall traps for sampling leaf litter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a tropical wet forest, Costa Rica. Biotropica 23: 166-172

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbist M.K. and Duelli P. 1996. Trapping efficiency of funnel- and cup-traps for epigeal arthropods. Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. 69: 361-369

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacio E.E. and Fernandéz F. 2003. Claves para las subfamilias y géneros. In: Introducción a las Hormigas de la Región Neotropical (Fernández F., Ed), Instituto Humboldt, Bogotá. pp 233-260

  • Porter S.D. 2005. A simple design for a rain-resistant pitfall trap. Insect. Soc. 52: 201-203

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeling C., Brown J.M. and Verhaagh M. 2008. Newly discovered sister lineage sheds light on early ant evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 30: 14913-14917

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribas C.R., Schoereder J.H., Pic M. and Soares S.M. 2003b. Tree heterogeneity, resource availability, and larger scale processes regulating arboreal ant species richness. Austral Ecol. 28: 305-314

  • Ribas C.R., Sobrinho T.G., Schoereder J.H., Sperber C.F., Lopes-Andrade C. and Soares S.M. 2005. How large is large enough for insects? Forest fragmentation effects at three spatial scales. Acta Oecol. 27: 31-41

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribas R.F., Meira-Neto J.A.A., Silva A.F. and Souza A.L. 2003a. Composição florística de dois trechos em diferentes etapas serais de uma Floresta Estacional Semidecidual em Viçosa, Minas Gerais. Rev. Árvore 27: 821-830

  • Schmidt F.A. and Diehl E. 2008. What is the effect of soil use on ant communities? Neotrop. Entomol. 37: 381-388

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz T.R. and McGlynn T.P. 2000. The interactions of ants with other organisms. In: Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity (Agosti D., Majer J., Alonso L.A. and Schultz T., Eds), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington London. pp 35-44

  • Silva R.R. and Silvestre R. 2004. Riqueza da fauna de formigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) que habita as camadas superficiais do solo em Seara, Santa Catarina. Pap. Avulsos Zool. 44: 1-11

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa-Souto L., Schoereder J.H. and Schaefer C.E.G.R. 2007. Leaf-cutting ants, seasonal burning and nutrient distribution in Cerrado vegetation. Austral Ecol. 32: 758-765

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood E.C. and Fisher B.L. 2006. The role of ants in conservation monitoring: If, when and how. Biol. Conserv. 132: 166-182

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde O. 1958. Estudo regional da Zona da Mata de Minas Gerais. Rev. Bras. Geogr. 20: 3-82

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloso H.P., Rangel Filho A.L.R. and Lima J.C.A. 1991. Classificação da Vegetação Brasileira, Adaptada a um Sistema Universal. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro. 123 pp

  • Wang C., Strazanac J. and Butler L. 2001. A comparison of pitfall traps with bait traps for studying leaf litter communities. J. Entomol. Soc. Am. 94: 761-765

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissflog A., Sternheim E., Dorow W.H.O., Berghoff S. and Maschwitz U. 2000. How to study subterranean army ants: a novel method for locating and monitoring field populations of the South East Asian army ant Dorylus (Dichthadia) laevigatus Smith, 1857 (Formicidae, Dorylinae) with observations on their ecology. Insect. Soc. 47: 317-324

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie K.T.R., Mertl A.R. and Tranielo J.F.A. 2007. Biodiversity below ground: probing the subterranean ant fauna of Amazonia. Naturwissenschaften 94: 392-395

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E.O. and Hölldobler B. 2005. Eusociality: Origin and consequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 13367-13371

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the farmers of Viçosa city and Universidade Federal de Viçosa for allowing access the forests and pasture in their properties. We are indebted to Carla R. Ribas for helping at fieldwork and Rodrigo Feitosa for his helping to confirm the ant identification. We are thankful to Renata Campos, Rodrigo Feitosa, Carla R. Ribas, José H. Schoereder, and two anonymous referees for critical reading of previous versions of the manuscript and to Heraldo L. Vasconcelos and Tatianne Marques who provided replying about further using of this pitfall. We also thank CAPES, CNPq and FAPEMIG for financial support and grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. A. Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, F.A., Solar, R.R.C. Hypogaeic pitfall traps: methodological advances and remarks to improve the sampling of a hidden ant fauna. Insect. Soc. 57, 261–266 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0078-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0078-1

Keywords

Navigation