Ploidy of the eusocial beetle Austroplatypus incompertus (Schedl) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and implications for the evolution of eusociality

Abstract

In the hymenopterans, haplodiploidy, leading to high-genetic relatedness amongst full sisters has been regarded as critical to kin selection and inclusive fitness hypotheses that explain the evolution of eusociality and altruistic behaviours. Recent evidence for independent origins of eusociality in phylogenetically diverse taxa has led to the controversy regarding the general importance of relatedness to eusociality and its evolution. Here, we developed a highly polymorphic microsatellite marker to test whether the eusocial ambrosia beetle Austroplatypus incompertus (Schedl) is haplodiploid or diplodiploid. We found that both males and females of A. incompertus are diploid, signifying that altruistic behaviour resulting from relatedness asymmetries did not play a role in the evolution of eusocialty in this species. This provides additional evidence against the haplodiploidy hypothesis and implicates alternative hypotheses for the evolution of eusociality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Boomsma J.J. 2007. Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Curr. Biol. 17: 673–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Crozier R.H. 2008. Advanced eusociality, kin selection and male haploidy. Aust. J. Entomol. 47: 2–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrell B.D., Sequeira A.S., O’Meara B.C., Normark B.B., Chung J.H. and Jordal B.H. 2001. The evolution of agriculture in beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae). Evolution 55: 2011–2027

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Foster K.R., Wenseleers T. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 2006. Kin selection is the key to altruism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 57–60

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton W.D. 1964. The genetical theory of social behaviour I, II. J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1–52

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes W.O.H., Oldroyd B.P., Beekman M. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 2008. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320: 1213–1216

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kent D.S. 2001. The Biology of the Ambrosia Beetle Austroplatypus incompertus (Schedl). Ph.D. thesis, University of Sydney. 229 pp

  8. Kent D.S. 2008. Mycangia of the ambrosia beetle, Austroplatypus incompertus (Schedl) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Platypodinae). Aust. J. Entomol. 47: 9–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kent D.S. and Simpson J.A. 1992. Eusociality in the beetle Austroplatypus incompertus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Naturwissenschaften 79: 86–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkendall L.R. 2006. A new host-specific ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus vochysiae (Curculionidae: Scolytinae), from Central America breeding in live trees. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 99: 211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirkendall L.R., Kent D.S. and Raffa K.A. 1997. Interactions among males, females and offspring in bark and ambrosia beetles: the significance of living in tunnels for the evolution of social behaviour. In: The Evolution of Social Behaviour in Insects and Arachnids (Choe J. and Crespi B., Eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 181–215

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marshall T.C., Slate J., Kruuk L.E.B. and Pemberton J.M. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7: 639–655

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Normark B.B., Jordal B.H. and Farrell B.D. 1999. Origin of a haplodiploid beetle lineage. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 2253–2259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peer K. and Taborsky M. 2007. Delayed dispersal as a potential route to cooperative breeding in ambrosia beetles. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 729–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Raymond M. and Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86: 248–249

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rozen S. and Skaletsky H.J. 2000. Primer 3. Code available at http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/genome_software/other/primer3.html.

  17. Smith S.M. and Stow A.J. 2008. Isolation and characterisation of novel microsatellite loci from the coppertail skink (Ctenotus taeniolatus). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8: 923–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sunnucks P. and Hales D.F. 1996. Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 510–523

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. West S.A., Griffin A.S. and Gardner A. 2007. Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 415–432

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson E.O. 2008. One giant leap: how insects achieved altruism and colonial life. BioScience 58: 17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Richard Frankham, Stephen Hoggard and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the draft of the manuscript. This research was partially supported by an Australian Research Council grant (DP0879229).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, S.M., Beattie, A.J., Kent, D.S. et al. Ploidy of the eusocial beetle Austroplatypus incompertus (Schedl) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and implications for the evolution of eusociality. Insect. Soc. 56, 285–288 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-009-0022-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Coleoptera
  • Eusociality
  • Diplodiploidy
  • Kin selection
  • Evolution