Skip to main content
Log in

Integrable Geodesic Flows on Surfaces

  • Published:
Geometric and Functional Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a new condition \({{\aleph}}\) which enables us to get new results on integrable geodesic flows on closed surfaces. This paper has two parts. In the first, we strengthen Kozlov’s theorem on non-integrability on surfaces of higher genus. In the second, we study integrable geodesic flows on a 2-torus. Our main result for a 2-torus describes the phase portraits of integrable flows. We prove that they are essentially standard outside what we call separatrix chains. The complement to the union of the separatrix chains is C 0-foliated by invariant sections of the bundle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. V.I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, (translated from the Russian by K. Vogtmann and A. Weinstein), Springer Graduate Texts in Mathematics 60 (1978).

  2. V. Bangert, Mather sets for twist maps and geodesics on tori, Dynamics Reported 1, Dynam. Report. Ser. Dynam. Systems Appl. 1, Wiley, Chichester (1988), 1–56.

  3. Bangert V. (1994) Geodesic rays, Busemann functions and monotone twist maps. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 2(1): 49–63

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bialy M. (1989) Aubry–Mather sets and Birkhoff’s theorem for geodesic flows on the two-dimensional torus. Comm. Math. Phys. 126(1): 13–24

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bialy M. (1991) On the number of caustics for invariant tori of Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 11(2): 273–278

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bialy M., Polterovich L. (1986) Geodesic flow on the two-dimensional torus and phase transitions “commensurability-noncommensurability”. Funct. Anal. Appl. 20: 260–266

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bialy M., Polterovich L. (1989) Lagrangian singularities of invariant tori of Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom. Invent. Math. 97(2): 291–303

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bialy M., Polterovich L. (1992) Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms and Lagrangian distributions. Geom. Funct. Anal. 2(2): 173–210

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolsinov A.V., Taimanov I.A. (2000) Integrable geodesic flows with positive topological entropy. Invent. Math 140: 639–650

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Butler L. (1999) A new class of homogeneous manifolds with Liouville-integrable geodesic flows. C. R. Math. Rep. Acad. Sci. Can. 21: 127–131

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Butler L. (2000) New examples of integrable geodesic flows. Asian J. Math. 4: 515–526

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Hatcher, Notes on basic 3-manifolds topology, http://www.math.cornell.edu/hatcher

  13. Hedlund G. (1932) Geodesics on a two-dimensional Riemannian manifold with periodic coefficients. Ann. Math. 33: 719–739

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hopf E. (1948) Closed surfaces without conjugate points. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 34: 47–51

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kozlov V.V. (1979) Topological obstructions to the integrability of natural mechanical systems. Soviet Math. Dokl. 20: 1413–1415

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kozlov V.V. (1983) Integrability and non-integrability in Hamiltonian mechanics. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 38(1): 3–67

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Long Y. (2008) Collection of problems proposed at International Conference on Variational Methods. Frontiers of Mathematics in China 3(2): 259–273

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mather J. (1990) Differentiability of the minimal average action as a function of the rotation number. Bol. Soc. Bras. Mat. 21: 59–70

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Morse A.P. (1939) The behavior of a function on its critical set. Ann. of Math. (2) 40(1): 62–70

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Morse H.M. (1924) A fundamental class of geodesics on any closed surface of genus greater than one. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 26: 25–60

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Paternain G.P. (1992) On the topology of manifolds with completely integrable geodesic flows. Erg. Th. Dynam. Sys. 12: 109–121

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Paternain G.P. (1994) On the topology of manifolds with completely integrable geodesic flows II. J. Geom. Phys. 13: 289–298

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Polterovich L. (1991) The second Birkhoff theorem for optical Hamiltonian systems. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 113(2): 513–516

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. I.A. Taimanov, Topological obstructions to integrability of geodesic flows on nonsimply connected manifolds, Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Ser. Mat. 51 (1987), 429–435; (trans. in Math. USSR Izv. 30 (1988), 403–409.

  25. Taimanov I.A. (1995) Topology of Riemannian manifolds with integrable geodesic flows. translation in Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 205: 139–150

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Misha Bialy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bialy, M. Integrable Geodesic Flows on Surfaces. Geom. Funct. Anal. 20, 357–367 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-010-0069-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-010-0069-4

Keywords and phrases

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation