Abstract
Objectives
Though natural phytoestrogen (PE) is a major factor in health authorities’ considerations regarding soy-based infant formula (SBIF), missing their concentrations may interfere with parents' informed decision.
Methods
We performed an Internet survey investigating soy-related knowledge of parents. We built multiple logistic regression models adjusted for personal covariates for the association between parental knowledge on PE and children intake of SBIF and checked the effect of having children ≤ 2 years old on this association.
Results
We enrolled 304 parents, 48.3% men, mean age 33.8 (standard deviation, SD 4.9), mostly with higher education. Of them, 76% had children under two years of age. Mean parental knowledge on PE was 9.83 (SD 3.28) from 20 possible points. Parental knowledge on PE reduced children's intake of SBIF (odds ratio, OR = 0.85 [95% confidence interval 0.70; 1.02]). Stronger inverse association was found for parents with children ≤ 2 comparing with those with older children (OR = 0.85 [0.67; 1.09] and OR = 0.68 [0.39; 1.18], respectively), although these differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusions
Adding PE content to information on SBIF may support informed decision.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adgent MA, Daniels JL, Edwards LJ, Siega-Riz AM, Rogan WJ (2011) Early-life soy exposure and gender-role play behavior in children. Environ Health Perspect 119(12):1811–1816. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103579
Amado KB, Bret KE (2013a) Parental perceptions and childhood diet quality: Who holds the reins. In: Preedy VR, Hunter L, Patel VB (eds) Diet Quality: an evidence-based approach, vol 1. Humana Press, New York, pp 177–197
Amado KB, Bret KE (2013b) Parental perceptions and childhood dietary quality. Maternal Child Health J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1326-6
Atanassova N, McKinnell C, Turner KJ, Walker M, Fisher JS, Morley M, Millar MR, Groome NP, Sharpe RM (2000) Comparative effects of neonatal exposure of male rats to potent and weak (environmental) estrogens on spermatogenesis at puberty and the relationship to adult testis size and fertility: evidence for stimulatory effects of low estrogen levels. Endocrinol 141(10):3898–3907
Barnes S (1995) Effect of genistein on in vitro and in vivo models of cancer. J Nutr 125:S777–S783
Barret JR (2006) The science of soy: what do we really know. Environm Health Perspect 114(6):A352–A358
Berger-Achituv S, Shohat T, Romano-Zelekha O (2005) Widespread use of soy-based formula without clinical indications. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 41:660–666
Bhatia J, Greer F (2008) American academy of pediatrics committee on nutrition the use of soy-based protein formulas in infant feeding. Pediatrics 121(5):1062–1068
Canadian Paediatric Society, Dietitians of Canada, Health Canada (2005) Nutrition for healthy term infants. Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Ottawa
Cao Y, Calafat AM, Doerge DR, Umbach DM, Bernbaum JC, Twaddle NC, Ye X, Rogan WJ (2009) Isoflavones in urine, saliva, and blood of infants: data from a pilot study on the estrogenic activity of soy formula. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 19:223–234
Dinsdale EC, Chen J, Ward EW (2011) Early life exposure to isoflavones adversely affects reproductive health in first but not second generation female CD-1 mice. J Nutr 141(11):1996–2002
Duncanson K, Dip G, Burrows T, Holman B, Collins C (2013) Parents’ perceptions of child feeding: a qualitative study based on the theory of planned behavior. J Develop Behav Pediatr 34:227–236
Fonseca ND, Villar MPM, Donangelo CM, Perrone D (2014) Isoflavones and soyasaponins in soy infant formulas in Brazil: profile and estimated consumption. Food Chem 143:492–498
IBM Corp. Released (2013) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. IBM Corp., Armonk
Jargin S (2014) Soy and phytoestrogens: possible side effects. German Med Sci 12:1–5
Jefferson WN, Doerge D, Padilla-Banks E, Woodling KA, Kissling GE, Newbold R (2009) Oral exposure to genistin, the glycosylated form of genistein, during neonatal life adversely affects the female reproductive system. Environ Health Perspect 117(12):1883–1889
Kleinman RE, Greer FR (2014) Pediatric nutrition. American Academy of Pediatrics. Commitee of Nutrition
Kurtoglu S, Bastug O (2014) Mini puberty and its interpretation. Turk Arch Pediatr 49:186–191
Leung A, Otley A (2009) Concerns for use of soy-based formulas in infant nutrition. Paediatric Child Health 14:109–113
Lewis RW, Brooks N, Milburn GM, Soames A, Stone S, Hall M, Ashby J (2003) The effects of the phytoestrogen genistein on the postnatal development of the rat. Toxicologic Sciences 71(1):74–83
Patisaul HB, Jefferson W (2010) The pros and cons of phytoestrogens. Front Neuroendocrinol 31:400–419
Rozman KK, Bhatia J, Calafat AM, Chambers C, Culty M, Etzel RA, Flaws JA, Hansen DK, Hoyer PB, Jeffery EH, Kesner JS, Marty S, Thomas JA, Umbach D (2006) NTP-CERHR expert panel report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of genistein. Birth Defects Res B 77:485–638
Setchell KD, Zimmer-Nechemias L, Cai J, Heubi JE (1998) Isoflavone content of infant formulas and the metabolic fate of these phytoestrogens in early life. Am J Clin Nutrition 68(6):1453S–1461S
Setchell KD, Cole SJ (2003) Variations in isoflavone levels in soy foods and soy protein isolates and issues related to isoflavone databases and food labeling. J Agricult Food Chem 51(14):4146–4155
Sahrpe RM, Martin B, Morris K, Greig I, McKinnell C, McNeilly AS, Walker M (2002) Infant feeding with soy formula milk: effects of the testis and blood testosterone levels in marmoset monkeys during the period of neonatal testicular activity. Hum Reprod 7:1692–1703
Strom BL, Schinnar R, Ziegler EE, Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Macones GA, Stallings VA, Drulis JM, Nelson SE, Hanson SA (2001) Exposure to soy-based formula in infancy and endocrinological and reproductive outcomes in young adulthood. J Am Med Assoc 286:807–814
Testa I, Salvatori C, Di Cara G, Latini A, Frati F, Troiani S, Principi N, Esposito S (2018) Soy-based infant formula: phyto-oestrogens still in doubt? Front nutr 5:110
Tishner N (2014) Vegetarian and vegan trend in Israel and worldwide. https://www.knesset.gov.il/mmm/data/pdf/m03385.pdf
Textor J, Hardt J, Knüppel S (2011) DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams. Epidemiol 5(22):745
Weber KS, Setchell KDR, Stocco DM, Lephart ED (2001) Dietary soy-phytoestrogens decrease testosterone levels and prostate weight without altering LH, prostate 5-reductase or testicular steroidogenic acute regulatory peptide levels in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. J Endocrinol 170:591–599
Westmark CJ (2017) Soy-based therapeutic baby formulas: testable hypotheses regarding the pros and cons. Front nutr. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00059
Acknowledgements
Authors gratefully acknowledge Michal Yackobovitch-Gavan from the Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, for her work during the preparation of this article.
Funding
Authors declare no funding or other sources to acknowledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval for this study was granted by Brandaman research institute, being member of the Israeli Ethical Association. Participation in the Internet-based survey was an indication of free willingness to participate in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the special issue "Market-driven forces and Public Health."
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shapira, N., Kushnir, T., Brandman, R. et al. Association between parental self-reported knowledge on soy and phytoestrogen and their children's intake of soy-based infant formulae—a cross-sectional study of Israeli parents. Int J Public Health 65, 1079–1085 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01413-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01413-3