What Roma nonadherence is likely and what drives it? Reply to Broz and Nunes
- 57 Downloads
We thank Broz and Nunes for appreciating our study on the drivers of nonadherence to medical recommendations among Roma in a segregated Roma settlement in Slovakia (Belak et al. 2018; Broz and Nunes 2019). In our reply, we first devote two sections to answer two general questions of the authors about Roma nonadherence. Next, we respond to their additional remarks and suggestions regarding related assessment tools. We close with a brief summary.
Do segregated Roma value their health less compared to poor non-Roma on average?
The segregated Roma we studied probably do value their health less than poor non-Roma. In two related previous studies (Belak et al. 2017, 2018), we found that the conviction among these Roma that adherence to medical recommendations is not appropriate for Roma, naturally and morally, contributed significantly to their nonadherence. We have already discussed in these papers that similar reasoning has been identified among other Central and East European (CEE) Roma,...
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- EUFRA (2018) A persisting concern: anti-Gypsyism as a barrier to Roma inclusion. European Union Fundamental Rights Agency, Luxembourg, p 60Google Scholar
- Petek D, Rotar Pavlic D, Svab I, Lolic D (2006) Attitudes of Roma toward smoking: qualitative study in Slovenia. Croat Med J 47(2):344–347Google Scholar