Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 64, Issue 5, pp 649–658 | Cite as

The influence of built, natural and social environment on physical activity among adults and elderly in southern Brazil: a population-based study

  • Jenifer Lopes BorchardtEmail author
  • Renata Gomes Paulitsch
  • Samuel Carvalho Dumith
Original article
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

This study investigated the association of built, natural and social environment variables with the practice of physical activity (PA) during leisure time and commuting.

Methods

Household interviews were carried out with a representative sample of individuals aged 18 years or older from a municipality in southern Brazil. PA was measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and households were georeferenced with a 500-m buffer.

Results

Few associations between environmental variables and PA practice were identified. Only proximity to the seafront, presence of private gyms or sports clubs and higher average monthly income of the household head were associated with the practice of PA. In addition, there were inconsistencies in the findings showing that the associations varied based on the intensity and modality of PA within the same domain.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence on the lack of association between objective environmental measures and the practice of PA. Although there were few significant results and the presence of inconsistencies in the findings, some environmental variables were associated with a more frequent practice of PA.

Keywords

Environment Leisure activity Geographic information system Walking Spatial analysis Urban population 

Notes

Authors’ contribution

JLB performed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. RGP supervised the collection of data and critically reviewed the article. SCD conceived the study and critically reviewed the article. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS), Grant ARD/PPP/2014, Application No. 16/2551-0000359-9.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJF, Martin BW (2012) Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet 380:258–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beenackers MA, Kamphuis CB, Giskes K, Brug J, Kunst AE, Burdorf A, van Lenthe FJ (2012) Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9:116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, Forsyth A, Sallis JF (2009) Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am J Prev Med 36:S99–S123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calise TV, Heeren T, DeJong W, Dumith SC, Kohl HW III (2013) Peer reviewed: do neighborhoods make people active, or do people make active neighborhoods? Evidence from a planned community in Austin, Texas. Prev Chronic Dis 10:120119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao X (2014) Residential self-selection in the relationships between the built environment and travel behavior: introduction to the special issue. J Transp Land Use 7:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cauwenberg JV, Cerin E, Timperio A, Salmon J, Deforche B, Veitch J (2017) Is the association between park proximity and recreational physical activity among mid-older aged adults moderated by park quality and neighborhood conditions? Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cerin E, Lee KY, Barnett A, Sit CH, Cheung MC, Chan WM (2013) Objectively-measured neighborhood environments and leisure-time physical activity in Chinese urban elders. Prev Med 56:86–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corseuil WM, Hallal PC, Xavier Corseuil H, Schneider IJC, D’orsi E (2012) Safety from crime and physical activity among older adults: a population-based study in Brazil. J Environ Public Health 2012:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE (2003) International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1381–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ding D, Adams MA, Sallis JF, Norman GJ, Hovell MF, Chambers CD, Gomez LF (2013) Perceived neighborhood environment and physical activity in 11 countries: Do associations differ by country? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 10:57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dumith SC, Hallal PC, Reis RS, Kohl HW (2011) Worldwide prevalence of physical inactivity and its association with human development index in 76 countries. Prev Med 53:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumith SC, Paulitsch RG, Carpena MX, Murano MFR, Simões MO, Machado KP, Duas MS, Kretschmer AC, Oliz MM, Pontes LS, Susin LRO (2018) Planning and execution of a population health survey by means of a multidisciplinary research consortium. Sci Med 28:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Filmer D, Pritchett LH (2001) Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography 38:115–132Google Scholar
  14. Florindo AA, Salvador EP, Reis RS, Guimaraes VV (2011) Perception of the environment and practice of physical activity by adults in a low socioeconomic area. Rev Saude Publica 45:302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, Swain DP (2011) Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:1334–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gebel K, Bauman A, Owen N (2009) Correlates of non-concordance between perceived and objective measures of walkability. Ann Behav Med 37:228–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gomes CS, Matozinhos FP, Mendes LL, Pessoa MC, Velasquez-Melendez G (2016) Physical and social environment are associated to leisure time physical activity in adults of a Brazilian city: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 11:e0150017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gomez LF, Sarmiento OL, Parra DC, Schmid TL, Pratt M, Jacoby E, Ardila M (2010) Characteristics of the built environment associated with leisure-time physical activity among adults in Bogotá, Colombia: a multilevel study. J Phys Act Health 7:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U, Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group (2012) Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet 380:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanibuchi T, Kawachi I, Nakaya T, Hirai H, Kondo K (2011) Neighborhood built environment and physical activity of Japanese older adults: results from the Aichi Gerontological Evaluation Study (AGES). BMC Public Health 11:657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hino AA, Reis RS, Florindo AA (2010) Ambiente construído e atividade física: uma breve revisão dos métodos de avaliação. Rev Bras Cineantropom. Desempenho Hum 12:387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) (2011) Censo Demográfico 2010: Características da População e dos domicílios: Resultados. IBGE, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  23. Kerr J, Norman G, Millstein R, Adams MA, Morgan C, Langer RD, Allison M (2014) Neighborhood environment and physical activity among older women: findings from the San Diego Cohort of the Women’s Health Initiative. J Phys Act Health 11:1070–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kienteka M, Fermino RC, Reis RS (2013) Fatores individuais e ambientais associados com o uso de bicicleta por adultos: uma revisão sistemática. Rev Bras de Ativ Fís e Saúde 19:12Google Scholar
  25. Krizek K, Johnson P (2006) Proximity to trails and retail: effects on urban cycling and walking. J Am Plan Assoc 72:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT (2012) Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 380:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S (2002) Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Soc Sci Med 55:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matsudo S, Araujo T, Marsudo V, Andrade D, Andrade E, Braggion G (2001) Questionário internacional de atividade física (IPAQ): estudo de validade e reprodutibilidade no Brasil. Rev Bras de Ativ Fís e Saúde 6:05–18Google Scholar
  29. McCormack GR (2017) Neighbourhood built environment characteristics associated with different types of physical activity in Canadian adults. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can 37:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rees-Punia E, Hathaway ED, Gay JL (2018) Crime, perceived safety, and physical activity: a meta-analysis. Prev Med 111:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J (2006) An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health 27:297–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sallis JF, Cerin E, Conway TL, Adams MA, Frank LD, Pratt M, Davey R (2016) Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 387:2207–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Silva ICM, Hino AA, Lopes A, Ekelund U, Brage S, Gonçalves H, Hallal PC (2017) Built environment and physical activity: domain-and activity-specific associations among Brazilian adolescents. BMC Public Health 17:616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sugiyama T, Neuhaus M, Cole R, Giles- Corti R, Owen N (2012) Destination and route attributes associated with adults’ walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44:1275–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tilahun NY, Levinson DM, Krizek KJ (2007) Trails, lanes, or traffic: valuing bicycle facilities with an adaptive stated preference survey. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 41:287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vigitel Brazil 2017: surveillance of risk and protective factors for chronic diseases by telephone survey: estimates of Frequency and sociodemographic distribution of risk and protective factors for chronic diseases in the capitals of the 26 Brazilian states and the Federal District in 2017. Brazilian: Ministry of Health, Secretariat of Health Surveillance, Department of Surveillance of Diseases and Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Promotion 2018Google Scholar
  37. Villaça F (2011) São Paulo: segregação urbana e desigualdade. Estudos avançados 25:37–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wendel-Vos W, Droomers M, Kremers S, Brug J, Van Lenthe F (2007) Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Obes Rev 8:425–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wood L, Shannon T, Bulsara M, Pikora T, McCormack G, Giles-Corti B (2008) The anatomy of the safe and social suburb: an exploratory study of the built environment, social capital and residents’ perceptions of safety. Health Place 14:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jenifer Lopes Borchardt
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Renata Gomes Paulitsch
    • 2
  • Samuel Carvalho Dumith
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Postgraduate Program in Public HealthFederal University of Rio GrandeRio GrandeBrazil
  2. 2.Postgraduate Program in Health SciencesFederal University of Rio GrandeRio GrandeBrazil
  3. 3.PelotasBrazil

Personalised recommendations