Development of a theoretical framework for assessment of quality of primary care medical service trips in Latin America

Abstract

Objectives

Short-term medical service trips (MSTs) are a controversial modality for addressing the health of marginalized populations. Despite their prevalence, there are no routinely used evaluative frameworks. This study used stakeholder consensus to validate a literature-based framework for MST best practices.

Methods

A recent systematic review was used to construct a preliminary list of best practices for short-term MSTs. We then recruited a multidisciplinary panel of academics, medical professionals, program coordinators, and non-medical volunteers for a three-round e-Delphi consensus-building exercise to review the list. A 7-point Likert scale was used, with mean scores 4–7 representing rejection, scores < 2 representing acceptance, and elements scoring in between being redistributed for discussion.

Results

The literature review identified 30 best practices. Twenty-six stakeholders were recruited for the e-Delphi panel, with 73.1% responding to all three rounds. Eighteen elements were accepted into the final framework.

Conclusions

This framework identifies essential MST best practices and enables volunteers to compare organizations. Future research should translate this framework into an assessment tool and initiate dialogue between host communities, local clinicians, and sending organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. ADAPTE (2009) The ADAPTE process: resource toolkit for guideline adaptation. ADAPTE (2009) Guideline adaptation: a resource toolkit. http://www.g-i-n.net

  2. Ahmed F, Grade M, Malm C et al (2017) Surgical volunteerism or voluntourism—are we doing more harm than good? Int J Surg Lond Engl 42:69–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR (2005) Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. AmeriCares (2013) Medical outreach best practices study: a literature review. AmeriCares. https://medicaloutreach.americares.org/globalassets/_mo/resources/07_bestpractices/americares-medoutreachpracticesstudy-lit-review-final.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2018

  5. Caldron PH, Impens A, Pavlova M, Groot W (2015) A systematic review of social, economic, and diplomatic aspects of short-term medical missions. BMC Health Serv Res 15:380. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0980-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Crump JA, Sugarman J (2008) Ethical Considerations for Short-term Experiences by Trainees in Global Health. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 300:1456–1458. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.12.1456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dainton C, Chu C (2015) Symptom clusters on primary care medical service trips in five regions in Latin America. J Epidemiol Glob Health 5:259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2014.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dainton C, Chu CH, Lin H, Loh L (2016) Clinical guidelines for Western clinicians engaged in primary care medical service trips in Latin America and the Caribbean: an integrative literature review. Trop Med Int Health 21:470–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H (2000) Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 32:1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Langowski MK, Iltis AS (2011) Global Health Needs and the Short-Term Medical Volunteer: ethical Considerations. HEC Forum 23:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-011-9158-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lasker JN (2016) Hoping to Help: The Promises and Pitfalls of Global Health Volunterring. Cornell Univeristy Press, United States of America

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lynn MR (1986) Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity. Nurs Res 35:382–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maki J, Qualls M, White B et al (2008) Health impact assessment and short-term medical missions: a methods study to evaluate quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res 8:121. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Meshkat B, Cowman S, Gethin G et al (2014) Using an e-Delphi technique in achieving consensus across disciplines for developing best practice in day surgery in Ireland. J Hosp Adm 3:1. https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v3n4p1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roche SD, Ketheeswaran P, Wirtz VJ (2016) International short-term medical missions: a systematic review of recommended practices. Int J Public Health 62:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0889-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rozier MD, Lasker JN, Compton B (2017) Short-term volunteer health trips: aligning host community preferences and organizer practices. Glob Health Action 10:1267957. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1267957

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Seager G (2012) When Healthcare Hurts: An Evidence Based Guide for Best Practices in Global Health Initiatives. AuthorHouse, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  20. Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID (2013) Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sykes KJ (2014) Short-Term Medical Service Trips: a Systematic Review of the Evidence. Am J Public Health 104(7):e38–e48. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301983

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Walker L, Avant K (2011) Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing, 5th edn. Pearson, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. WHO (2013) Classification and minimum standards for foreign medical teams in sudden onset disasters. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  24. WPRO (2010) The WHO health systems framework. In: WPRO, World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.wpro.who.int/health_services/health_systems_framework/en/. Accessed 1 Feb 2018

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Dainton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dainton, C., Chu, C.H., Gorman, C. et al. Development of a theoretical framework for assessment of quality of primary care medical service trips in Latin America. Int J Public Health 64, 333–342 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1199-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Medical missions
  • Global health
  • Primary care
  • Medical service trips
  • Medical education
  • Medical volunteering