Intervention policies and social security in case of reduced working capacity in the Netherlands, Finland and Germany: a comparative analysis
Working age disability is a major challenge for policymakers in European countries. This pertains to both occupational reintegration and social benefits for work incapacity. In many states reforms have been initiated aimed at reducing disability scheme inflow and fostering return to work. Our study was motivated by the question as to which aspects of these reforms seem to have been effective.
Three different approaches were utilized: case vignettes, interviews and expert workshops in the respective countries (Netherlands and Germany in 2012; Finland in 2015), and a systematic search for relevant studies on occupational reintegration was performed.
We found considerable differences as to the assessment of work incapacity and resulting monetary benefits in the three countries. Also, organisation and practices of occupational reintegration vary from one country to another. Major differences concern (1) the timing of interventions, (2) employer responsibility and workplace involvement, (3) incentives and sanctions and (4) organisational and procedural issues.
Our results may partly explain why some reform strategies have been more successful than others, and thus contribute to the further development of social and labour policies in Europe.
KeywordsLong-term ill or disabled Social security Return to work efforts Policies and practices in the Netherlands Finland Germany
This study was funded by the Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, a foundation of the Confederation of German Trade Unions (Grant Number 2014-694-4).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any study with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- De Boer W (2010) Quality of evaluation of work disability. Academisch Proefschrift. http://publications.tno.nl/publication/102641/Nannhn/boer-2010-quality. Accessed 17 June 2018
- Devetzi S (2011) Reforms of the incapacity benefits system in Europe. In: Devetzi S, Stendahl S (eds) Too sick to work? Social security reforms in Europe for persons with reduced earnings capacity. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 175–184Google Scholar
- Halonen JI, Solovieva S, Pentti J, Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Viikari-Juntura E (2016) Effectiveness of legislative changes obligating notification of prolonged sickness absence and assessment of remaining work ability on return to work and work participation: a natural experiment in Finland. Occup Environ Med 73(1):42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Monetary Fund (2017) https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2017/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2012&ey=2016&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&pr1.x=49&pr1.y=6&c=172%2C138%2C134&s=NGDPRPC%2CNGDPPC&grp=0&a=. Accessed 17 June 2018
- Kohte W (2008) Betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement und Bestandsschutz. Der Betrieb 11:582–587Google Scholar
- Niemelä H, Salminen K (2006) Soziale Sicherheit in Finnland. Helsinki: ETK, KELA, STM & TELA. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/17438/sozialelsiche.PDF?sequence=1. Accessed 17 June 2018
- OECD (2010) Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. http://www.oecd.org/publications/sickness-disability-and-work-breaking-the-barriers-9789264088856-en.htm. Accessed 17 June 2018
- Pennings F (2011) The new Dutch disability benefits act: the link between income provision and participation in work. In: Devetzi S, Stendahl S (eds) Too sick to work? Social security reforms in Europe for persons with reduced earnings capacity. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 77–93Google Scholar
- Pomaki G, Franche RL, Khushrushahi N, Murray E, Lampinen T, Mah P (2010) Best practice for return-to-work/stay-at-work interventions for workers with mental health conditions. Final report. Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare in BC (OHSAH), Vancouver, BCGoogle Scholar
- Prinz C (2010) Sickness, disability and work: lessons from reforms and lack of change across the OECD countries. In: Kautto M, Bach-Othman J (eds) Disability and employment—lessons from reforms, Finnish Center for Pensions, Helsinki, pp 23–34Google Scholar
- Ramm D, Mahnke C, Tauscher A, Welti F, Seider H, Shafaei R (2014) Betriebliches Eingliederungsmanagement in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben. Rechtliche Anforderungen und Voraussetzungen einer erfolgreichen Umsetzung. Die Rehabilitation 51:10–17Google Scholar
- Rentenversicherung Deutsche (2012) Rentenversicherung in Zahlen 2012. DRV, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen (2015) Krankengeld: Entwicklung, Ursachen und Steuerungsmöglichkeiten. Sondergutachten. http://www.svr-gesundheit.de/fileadmin/GA2015/SVR_Sondergutachten_2015_Krankengeld_Druckfassung.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2018
- Van Sonsbeek JM, Gradus R (2011) Estimating the effects of recent disability reforms in the Netherlands. Tinbergen-Institute, RotterdamGoogle Scholar