Spirituality as a protective health asset for young people: an international comparative analysis from three countries

Abstract

Objectives

Spirituality has been proposed as a potential health asset a ‘developmental engine’ that works by fostering the search for connectedness, meaning and purpose. The aim is to examine to what extent spiritual health might be protective of young people’s overall health and well-being.

Methods

In 2014, young people aged 11, 13, and 15 years in England, Scotland and Canada were surveyed as part of the HBSC study (n = 26,701). The perceived importance of spiritual health and domains (connections with self, others, nature, and the transcendent) was measured in these countries. Multi-level log-binomial models were used to explore relationships between spiritual health and three self-reported positive health outcomes: general health status, subjective life satisfaction and health complaints.

Results

Higher levels of perceptions of the importance of spiritual health, both overall and within the four domains, were associated with higher likelihoods of reporting each of the positive health outcomes.

Conclusions

Spiritual health appears to operate as a protective health asset during adolescence and is significantly shaped by external relationships and connections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Barton J, Bragg R, Pretty J, Roberts J, Wood C (2016) The wilderness expedition: an effective life course intervention to improve young people’s well-being and connectedness to nature. J Exp Educ 39(1):59–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825915626933

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benson PL, Roehlkepartain EC, Rude SP (2003) Spiritual development in childhood and adolescence: toward a field of inquiry. Appl Dev Sci 7(3):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0703_12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boniel-NissimI M, Tabak I, Mazur J, Borraccino A, Brooks F, Gommans R et al (2015) Supportive communication with parents moderates the negative effects of electronic media use on life satisfaction during adolescence. Int J Public Health 60(2):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0636-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks F, Kendall S (2013) Making sense of assets: what can an assets based approach offer public health? Editorial special edition: assets and public health. Crit Public Health 23(2):127–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.783687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks F, Van der Sluijs W, Klemera E, Morgan A, Magnusson J, Nic Gabhainn S, et al. (2009) Young People’s Health in Great Britain and Ireland: Findings from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey, 2006. Cardiff, Edinburgh, Galway, Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire and University of Edinburgh

  6. Brooks FM, Magnusson J, Spencer N, Morgan A (2012) Adolescent multiple risk behaviour: an asset approach to the role of family, school and community. J Public Health 34(1):48–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0636-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chanfreau J, Lloyd C, Byron C, Roberts C, Craig R, De Foe D et al (2013) Predicting well-being. Prepared by NatCen Social Research for the Department of Health. http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/205352/predictors-of-wellbeing.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2018

  8. Coleman J (2009) Emotional Health and Wellbeing. In: Coleman J, Hendry LB, Kloep M (eds) Adolescence and health. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cotton S, Larkin E, Hoopes A, Cromer BA, Rosenthal SL (2005) The impact of adolescent spirituality on depressive symptoms and health risk behaviors. J Adolesc Health 36(6):529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.07.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fenton C, Brooks F, Spencer N, Morgan A (2010) Sustaining a positive body image in adolescence: an assets-based analysis. Health Soc Care Community 18(2):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00888.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher JW (2010) The four domains model: connecting spirituality, health and well-being. Religions 2(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel2010017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Moya I, Brooks F, Morgan A, Smeeton N (2014) Subjective well-being in adolescence and teacher connectedness. A health asset analysis. Health Educ J 74(6):641–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896914555039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. General Assembly. Convention on the rights of the child (1989) United Nations, Treaty Series 1577. Available at http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html. Accessed 8 Jan 2018

  14. Haugland S, Wold B, Ji Stevenson, Le Aaroe, Woynarowska B (2001) Subjective health complaints in adolescence. Eur J Public Health 11(1):4–10

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hay D, Nye R (1998) The spirit of the child. Fount Paperbacks, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Inchley J, Currie C, Young T, Samdal O, Torsheim T, Augustson L, et al (2016) Growing up unequal: gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2013/2014 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016 (Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No. 7)

  17. Kia-Keating M, Dowdy E, Morgan M, Noam G (2011) Protecting and promoting: an integrative conceptual model for healthy development of adolescents. J Adolesc Health 48(3):220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Klemera E, Chester KL, Magnusson J, Spencer N, Brooks F (2016) Self-harm in adolescence: protective health assets in the family, school and community. Int J Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0900-2

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Larson DB, Larson S (2003) Spirituality’s potential relevance to physical and emotional health: a brief review of quantitative research. J Psychol Theol 31(1):37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lerner J, Phelps E, Forman Y (2009) Positive youth development. In: Lerner R, Steinberg L (eds) handbook of adolescent psychology: individual bases of adolescent development, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 524–558

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levin KA, Currie C (2013) Reliability and validity of an adapted version of the Cantril ladder for use with adolescent samples. Soc Indic Res 119(2):1047–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0507-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Louv R (2005) Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  23. Michaelson V, Brooks F, Jirasek I, Inchley J, Whitehead R, King N et al (2016) Developmental patterns of adolescent spiritual health in six countries. Soc Sci Med Popul Health 2:294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.03.006

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miller WR, Thoresen CE (2003) Spirituality, religion, and health: an emerging research field. Am Psychol 58(1):24–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan A, Haglund BJA (2009) Social capital does matter for adolescent health: evidence from the English HBSC study. Health Promot Int 24(2):363–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morgan A, Ziglio E (2007) Revitalizing the evidence base for public health: an assets model. Glob Health Promot 14(2):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/10253823070140020701x

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pyle RM (2003) Nature matrix: reconnecting people and nature. Oryx 37(2):206–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605303000383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Rajmil L, Herdman M, Auquier P, Bruil J et al (2012) Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 19(10):1487–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9706-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Richards M, Huppert F (2011) Do positive children become positive adults? Evidence from a longitudinal birth cohort study. J Posit Psychol 6(1):75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.536655

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rutter M (1990) Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In: Rolf J, Masten A, Cicchetti D, Neuchterlein K, Weintraub S (eds) Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 181–214

    Google Scholar 

  31. SAS Institute (2013) SAS 9.3 output delivery system: User’s Guide. SAS institute

  32. Schnell T (2011) Individual differences in meaning-making: considering the variety of sources of meaning, their density and diversity. Personal Individ Differ 51(5):667–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sointu E, Woodhead L (2008) Spirituality, gender, and expressive selfhood. J Sci Stud Relig 47(2):259–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00406.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vader J (2006) Spiritual health: the next frontier. Eur J Public Health 16(5):457. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckl234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ward Thompson C, Aspinall P, Montarzino A (2008) The childhood factor: adult visits to green places and the significance of childhood experience. Environ Behav 40(1):111–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wölfer R, Cortina KS, Baumert J (2012) Embeddedness and empathy: how the social network shapes adolescents’ social understanding. J Adolesc 35(5):1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The three countries involved in this analysis were funded by (1) The Department of Health, England. (2) The Public Health Agency of Canada and the Canadian Institute of Health Research (operating Grant MOP341188). (3) NHS Health Scotland.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona Brooks.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. All questionnaires were anonymous. Approval was gained from the following ethics review boards: Queen′s University (Canada), the University of Hertfordshire (England), and St Andrews University (Scotland). Student participation was voluntary, and consent (explicit or implicit) was sought from school administrators, parents, and participating students as per national human subject requirements.

Additional information

For the HBSC Child Spiritual Health Writing Group which consists of investigators from the HBSC study in the following countries, Canada, Czech Republic, England, Israel, Poland, Lativa and Scotland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brooks, F., Michaelson, V., King, N. et al. Spirituality as a protective health asset for young people: an international comparative analysis from three countries. Int J Public Health 63, 387–395 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-1070-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Young people
  • Gender
  • Nature
  • Spiritual health
  • Spirituality