Spirituality as a protective health asset for young people: an international comparative analysis from three countries
Spirituality has been proposed as a potential health asset a ‘developmental engine’ that works by fostering the search for connectedness, meaning and purpose. The aim is to examine to what extent spiritual health might be protective of young people’s overall health and well-being.
In 2014, young people aged 11, 13, and 15 years in England, Scotland and Canada were surveyed as part of the HBSC study (n = 26,701). The perceived importance of spiritual health and domains (connections with self, others, nature, and the transcendent) was measured in these countries. Multi-level log-binomial models were used to explore relationships between spiritual health and three self-reported positive health outcomes: general health status, subjective life satisfaction and health complaints.
Higher levels of perceptions of the importance of spiritual health, both overall and within the four domains, were associated with higher likelihoods of reporting each of the positive health outcomes.
Spiritual health appears to operate as a protective health asset during adolescence and is significantly shaped by external relationships and connections.
KeywordsAdolescent Young people Gender Nature Spiritual health Spirituality
The three countries involved in this analysis were funded by (1) The Department of Health, England. (2) The Public Health Agency of Canada and the Canadian Institute of Health Research (operating Grant MOP341188). (3) NHS Health Scotland.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. All questionnaires were anonymous. Approval was gained from the following ethics review boards: Queen′s University (Canada), the University of Hertfordshire (England), and St Andrews University (Scotland). Student participation was voluntary, and consent (explicit or implicit) was sought from school administrators, parents, and participating students as per national human subject requirements.
- Boniel-NissimI M, Tabak I, Mazur J, Borraccino A, Brooks F, Gommans R et al (2015) Supportive communication with parents moderates the negative effects of electronic media use on life satisfaction during adolescence. Int J Public Health 60(2):189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-014-0636-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brooks F, Van der Sluijs W, Klemera E, Morgan A, Magnusson J, Nic Gabhainn S, et al. (2009) Young People’s Health in Great Britain and Ireland: Findings from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey, 2006. Cardiff, Edinburgh, Galway, Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire and University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
- Chanfreau J, Lloyd C, Byron C, Roberts C, Craig R, De Foe D et al (2013) Predicting well-being. Prepared by NatCen Social Research for the Department of Health. http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/205352/predictors-of-wellbeing.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2018
- Coleman J (2009) Emotional Health and Wellbeing. In: Coleman J, Hendry LB, Kloep M (eds) Adolescence and health. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
- General Assembly. Convention on the rights of the child (1989) United Nations, Treaty Series 1577. Available at http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html. Accessed 8 Jan 2018
- Hay D, Nye R (1998) The spirit of the child. Fount Paperbacks, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Inchley J, Currie C, Young T, Samdal O, Torsheim T, Augustson L, et al (2016) Growing up unequal: gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2013/2014 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016 (Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No. 7)Google Scholar
- Louv R (2005) Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
- Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Rajmil L, Herdman M, Auquier P, Bruil J et al (2012) Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 19(10):1487–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9706-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute (2013) SAS 9.3 output delivery system: User’s Guide. SAS instituteGoogle Scholar