International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 429–430 | Cite as

The use of critical incident technique in population health intervention research: lessons learned

  • Achille Dadly Borvil
  • Natalie Kishchuk
  • Louise Potvin
Hints & Kinks

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study is not funded.

Conflict of interest

Author A: Achille Dadly Borvil declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author B: Natalie Kishchuk declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author C: Louise Potvin declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Butterfield LD, Borgen WA, Amundson NE, Maglio A-ST (2005) Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954–2004 and beyond. Qual Res 5(4):475–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Champagne A, Clennett-Sirois L (2016) Les émotions en recherche: pourraient-elles nous permettre de mieux comprendre le monde social? Rech Qual 20:83–99Google Scholar
  3. Figueiro AC, Oliveira SR-DA, Hartz Z, Couturier Y, Bernier J, Freire M-DSM, Samico I, Medina MG, De Sa RF, Potvin L (2017) A tool for exploring the dynamics of innovative interventions for public health: the critical event card. Int J Public Health 62(2):177–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 51(4):327–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École de Santé Publique/Université de MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.École de Santé Publique/Université de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations