The effects of non-physical peer sexual harassment on high school students’ psychological well-being in Norway: consistent and stable findings across studies

  • Mons Bendixen
  • Josef Daveronis
  • Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair
Original Article



The paper examines how strongly non-physical peer sexual harassment is associated with a wide range of well-being outcomes from symptoms of depression and anxiety to self-esteem and body image.


Two large community samples of high school students were analyzed (n = 1384 and n = 1485). Students responded to questionnaires on being subject to non-physical sexual harassment, sexual coercion and forced intercourse, and to well-being indicators ranging from anxiety, depression, self-esteem, body image.


Regression analyses suggest that being harassed by peers in a non-physical way was moderately associated with lower levels of well-being over and above the effect of other risk factors. This effect was present for all indicators of well-being. The effect of peer harassment on depressive symptoms was moderated by sex (affected women more) but not by sexual or ethnic minority status.


The findings imply that although sticks and stones may break bones, it does seem that derogatory words and other forms of non-physical sexual harassment definitely harm high school students.


Well-being Peer sexual harassment Emerging adults Gender Sexual and ethnic minorities 



Thanks to Sør-Trøndelag County Authority for supporting this research, and to the students and staff of the participating high schools. Mons Bendixen (MB) and Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair (LEOK) conceived the study, designed and coordinated both studies, and drafted the manuscript. MB performed the final statistical analyses. MB and LEOK participated in the interpretation of the data. Josef Daveronis (JD) participated in the development of the research questions, performed the initial statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical statement

The study was carried out in line with the American Psychological Association’s ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.


  1. Alsaker FD (1992) Pubertal timing, overweight, and psychological adjustment. J Early Adolesc 12:396–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsaker FD, Olweus D (1986) Assessment of global negative self-evaluations and percieved stability of self in Norwegian preadolscents and adolescents. J Early Adolesc 6:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Association of University Women (2001) Hostile hallways: bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in school. American Association of University Women, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Bech P, Rasmussen NA, Olsen LR, Noerholm V, Abildgaard W (2001) The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity. J Affect Disord 66:159–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendixen M, Kennair LEO (2014) Resultater fra prosjekt Seksuell helse og trakassering i videregående opplæring 2013–2014 [Findings from the Sexual health and harassment project in high school education 2013-2014]. vol ISBN 978-82-8094-018-6 (pdf). NTNU, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendixen M, Kennair LEO (2017) Advances in the understanding of same-sex and opposite-sex sexual Harassment. Evol Hum Behav 38:583–591. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss DM, Duntley JD (2008) Adaptations for exploitation Group Dyn 12:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiodo D, Wolfe DA, Crooks C, Hughes R, Jaffe P (2009) Impact of sexual harassment victimization by peers on subsequent adolescent victimization and adjustment: a longitudinal study. J Adolesc Health 45:246–252. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Collier KL, van Beusekom G, Bos HMW, Sandfort TGM (2013) Sexual orientation and gender identity/expression related peer victimization in adolescence: a systematic review of associated psychosocial and health outcomes. J Sex Res 50:299–317. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Connolly J et al (2015) Evaluation of a youth-led program for preventing bullying, sexual harassment, and dating aggression in middle schools. J Early Adolesc 35:403–434. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahlqvist HZ, Landstedt E, Young R, Gadin KG (2016) Dimensions of peer sexual harassment victimization and depressive symptoms in adolescence: a longitudinal cross-lagged study in a Swedish sample. J Youth Adolesc. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. de Lijster GPA, Felten H, Kok G, Kocken PL (2016) Effects of an interactive school-based program for preventing adolescent sexual harassment: a cluster-randomized controlled evaluation study. J Youth Adolesc 45:874–886. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Dey EL (1997) Working with low survey response rates: the efficacy of weighting adjustments. Res High Educ 38:215–227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffy J, Wareham S, Walsh M (2004) Psychological consequences for high school students of having been sexually harassed. Sex Roles 50:811–821. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Felix ED, McMahon SD (2006) Gender and multiple forms of peer victimization: how do they influence adolescent psychosocial adjustment? Violence Vict 21:707–724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gotlib IH, Hammen CL (2015) Handbook of depression. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Gruber JE, Fineran S (2008) Comparing the impact of bullying and sexual harassment victimization on the mental and physical health of adolescents. Sex Roles 59:1–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kennair LEO, Bendixen M (2012) Sociosexuality as predictor of sexual harassment and coercion in female and male high school students. Evol Hum Behav 33:479–490. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Landstedt E, Gillander Gådin K (2011) Experiences of violence among adolescents: gender patterns in types, perpetrators and associated psychological distress. Intl J Pub Health 56:419–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lichty LF, Campbell R (2012) Targets and witnesses: middle school students’ sexual harassment experiences. J Early Adolesc 32:414–430. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol 86:114. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Marshall SK, Faaborg-Andersen P, Tilton-Weaver LC, Stattin H (2013) Peer sexual harassment and deliberate self-injury: longitudinal cross-lag investigations in Canada and Sweden. J Adolesc Health 53:717–722. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell KJ, Ybarra ML, Korchmaros JD (2014) Sexual harassment among adolescents of different sexual orientations and gender identities. Child Abuse Negl 38:280–295. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nolen-Hoeksema S (2001) Gender differences in Depression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 10:173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ormerod AJ, Collinsworth LL, Perry LA (2008) Critical climate: relations among sexual harassment. Climate, and outcomes for high school girls and boys. Psychol Women Q 32:113–125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paludi MA (1997) Sexual harassement in schools. In: O’Donohue W (ed) Sexual harassement: theory, research, and treatment. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp 225–249Google Scholar
  27. Petersen JL, Hyde JS (2009) A longitudinal investigation of peer sexual harassment victimization in adolescence. J Adolesc 32:1173–1188. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pina A, Gannon TA, Saunders B (2009) An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues. Aggress Violent Behav 14:126–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Skoog T, Özdemir SB, Stattin H (2015) Understanding the link between pubertal timing in girls and the development of depressive symptoms: the role of sexual harassment. J Youth Adolesc. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Slaatten H, Anderssen N, Hetland J (2015) Gay-related name-calling among Norwegian adolescents—harmful and harmless. Scand J Psychol 56:708–716. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. StataCorp (2015) Stata Statistical Software: release 14. StataCorp LP, College StationGoogle Scholar
  34. Strand BH, Dalgard OS, Tambs K, Rognerud M (2003) Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatry 57:113–118. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations