Skip to main content

Support for smoke-free policies in the Cyprus hospitality industry



The present study used attitudinal and behavioural indicators to measure support for smoke-free policies among employers and employees in the hospitality industry in Cyprus.


A representative sample of 600 participants (95 % response rate) completed anonymous structured questionnaires on demographic variables, smoking status, exposure to second-hand smoke at work and related health beliefs, social norms, and smoke-free policy support.


Participants were predominantly males (68.3 %), with a mean age of 40 years (SD = 12.69), and 39.7 % were employers/owners of the hospitality venue. Analysis of variance showed that employers and smokers were less supportive of smoke-free policies, as compared to employees and non-smokers. Linear regression models showed that attitudes towards smoke-free policy were predicted by smoking status, SHS exposure and related health beliefs, and social norm variables. Logistic regression analysis showed that willingness to confront a policy violator was predicted by SHS exposure, perceived prevalence of smoker clients, and smoke-free policy attitudes.


SHS exposure and related health beliefs, and normative factors should be targeted by interventions aiming to promote policy support in the hospitality industry in Cyprus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Apollonio DE, Bero LA (2007) The creation of industry front groups: the tobacco industry and “get government off our back”. Am J Public Health 97:419–427. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.081117

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borland R, Yong HH, Siahpush M, Hyland A, Campbell S, Hastings G, Cummings KM, Fong GT (2006) Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob control 15:iii34–iii41. doi:10.1136/tc.2004.008748

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Callinan JE, Clarke A, Doherty K, Kelleher C (2010) Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Coch Dat Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub2

  4. Germain D, Wakefield M, Durkin S (2007) Non-smokers’ responses when smokers light up: a population-based study. Prev Med 45:21–25. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P (2006) Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 38:69–119. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez M, Glantz SA (2013) Failure of policy regarding smoke-free bars in the Netherlands. Eur J Public Health 23:139–145. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckr173

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hang B, Sarker AH, Havel C et al (2013) Thirdhand smoke causes DNA damage in human cells. Mutagenesis 28:381–391. doi:10.1093/mutage/get013

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofstede G (2011) Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Read Psychol Cult. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014

    Google Scholar 

  9. Joosens L, Raw M (2013) The tobacco control scale 2013 in Europe. Association of European Cancer Leagues (ECL), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karekla M, Symeou A, Tsangari H, Kapsou M, Constantinou M (2009) Smoking prevalence and tobacco exposure among adolescents in Cyprus. Eur J Public Health 19:655–661. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckp064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Klepeis NE, Hughes SC, Edwards RD et al (2013) Promoting smoke-free homes: a novel behavioral intervention using real-time audio-visual feedback on airborne particle levels. PLoS One 8:e73251. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073251

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laumbach R, Kipen H (2014) Mechanistic data support protecting non-smokers from the lethal effects of second-hand smoke. Int J Public Health. doi:10.1007/s00038-014-0550-1

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lazuras L, Eiser JR, Rodafinos A (2009a) Predicting smokers’ non-compliance with smoking restrictions in public places. Tob Control 18:127–131. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.025841

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazuras L, Rodafinos A, Eiser R (2009b) Greece: smoking ban, or smoke and mirrors? Tob Control 18:343–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lazuras L, Zlatev M, Rodafinos A, Eiser JR (2012) Smokers’ compliance with smoke-free policies, and non-smokers’ assertiveness for smoke-free air in the workplace: a study from the Balkans. Int J Public health 57:769–775. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0338-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Q, Hyland A, O’Connor R, Zhao G, Du L, Li X, Fong GT (2010) Support for smoke-free policies among smokers and non-smokers in six cities in China: ITC China Survey. Tob Control 19:i40–i46. doi:10.1136/tc.2009.029850

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD et al (2013) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 380:2224–2260. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Louka P, Maguire M, Evans P, Worrell M (2006) ‘I think that it’s a pain in the ass that I have to stand outside in the cold and have a cigarette’ Representations of smoking and experiences of disapproval in UK and Greek smokers. J Health Psychol 11:441–451. doi:10.1177/1359105306063317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Macy JT, Chassin L, Presson CC (2013) The association between implicit and explicit attitudes toward smoking and support for tobacco control measures. Nic Tob Res 15:291–296. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mathers CD, Loncar D (2006) Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med 3(11):e442. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Matt GE, Quintana PGE, Destaillats H et al (2013) Thirdhand tobacco smoke: emerging evidence and arguments for a multidisciplinary research agenda. Environ Health Perspect 119:1218–1226. doi:10.1289/ehp.1103500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Öberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, Peruga A, Prüss-Ustün A (2011) Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet 377:139–146. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61388-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Poland BD, Cohen JE, Ashley MJ et al (2000) Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions. Tob Control 9:364–371

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ritch WA, Begay ME (2001) Strange bedfellows: the history of collaboration between the Massachusetts Restaurant Association and the tobacco industry. Am J Public Health 91:598–603

    PubMed Central  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sivri C, Lazuras L, Rodafinos A, Eiser JR (2013) Smoke-free policies and non-smokers’ reactions to SHS exposure in small and medium enterprises. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 26:940–948. doi:10.2478/s13382-013-0166-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tamvakas I, Amos A (2010) ‘These things don’t happen in Greece’: a qualitative study of Greek young people’s attitudes to smoking, secondhand smoke and the smokefree legislation. Health Educ Res 25:955–964. doi:10.1093/her/cyq048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. World Health Organization (2009) WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2009: implementing smoke-free environments. WHO, Geneva

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was co-funded by the Republic of Cyprus and the European Regional Development Fund through the Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lambros Lazuras.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standard

The study complies with the current laws of the country in which it was performed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lazuras, L., Savva, C.S., Talias, M.A. et al. Support for smoke-free policies in the Cyprus hospitality industry. Int J Public Health 60, 911–917 (2015).

Download citation


  • Smoke-free policies
  • Hospitality industry
  • Policy support
  • Cyprus