Support for smoke-free policies in the Cyprus hospitality industry
The present study used attitudinal and behavioural indicators to measure support for smoke-free policies among employers and employees in the hospitality industry in Cyprus.
A representative sample of 600 participants (95 % response rate) completed anonymous structured questionnaires on demographic variables, smoking status, exposure to second-hand smoke at work and related health beliefs, social norms, and smoke-free policy support.
Participants were predominantly males (68.3 %), with a mean age of 40 years (SD = 12.69), and 39.7 % were employers/owners of the hospitality venue. Analysis of variance showed that employers and smokers were less supportive of smoke-free policies, as compared to employees and non-smokers. Linear regression models showed that attitudes towards smoke-free policy were predicted by smoking status, SHS exposure and related health beliefs, and social norm variables. Logistic regression analysis showed that willingness to confront a policy violator was predicted by SHS exposure, perceived prevalence of smoker clients, and smoke-free policy attitudes.
SHS exposure and related health beliefs, and normative factors should be targeted by interventions aiming to promote policy support in the hospitality industry in Cyprus.
KeywordsSmoke-free policies Hospitality industry Policy support Cyprus
This study was co-funded by the Republic of Cyprus and the European Regional Development Fund through the Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation.
Compliance with ethical standards
The study complies with the current laws of the country in which it was performed.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Borland R, Yong HH, Siahpush M, Hyland A, Campbell S, Hastings G, Cummings KM, Fong GT (2006) Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob control 15:iii34–iii41. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008748 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Callinan JE, Clarke A, Doherty K, Kelleher C (2010) Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Coch Dat Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub2
- Joosens L, Raw M (2013) The tobacco control scale 2013 in Europe. Association of European Cancer Leagues (ECL), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
- Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD et al (2013) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 380:2224–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Louka P, Maguire M, Evans P, Worrell M (2006) ‘I think that it’s a pain in the ass that I have to stand outside in the cold and have a cigarette’ Representations of smoking and experiences of disapproval in UK and Greek smokers. J Health Psychol 11:441–451. doi: 10.1177/1359105306063317 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar