Abstract
Objectives
Few longitudinal studies have investigated how cyberbullying interacts with traditional bullying among young people, who are increasingly using online environments to seek information, entertainment and to socialise. This study aimed to identify the associations between the relative contribution of cyberbullying victimisation and traditional bullying victimisation on social and emotional antecedents and outcomes among adolescents.
Methods
Participants were a cohort of 1,504 adolescents from 16 Australian schools followed from age 13 to 15 years.
Results
Adolescents experiencing social and emotional difficulties were more likely to be cyberbullied and traditionally bullied, than traditionally bullied only. Those targeted in both ways experienced more harm and stayed away from school more often than those traditionally bullied only.
Conclusions
These findings suggest a high coexistence of cyber and traditional bullying behaviours and their antecedents, and higher levels of harm from a combination of these behaviours for adolescents over time. Future research should engage students as co-researchers to enhance school and parent strategies to support adolescents experiencing difficulties, and to reduce the likelihood of both cyber and traditional bullying.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderman C, Cheadle A, Curry S, Diehr P, Shultz L, Wagner E (1995) Selection bias related to parental consent in school-based survey research. Eval Rev 19:663–674
Barker V (2009) Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: the influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. CyberPsychology Behav 12:209–213
Barnes A, Pearce N, Cross D, Thomas L, Slee P (2015) Using online environments to build school staff capacity to address student wellbeing. In: Shute R, Slee P (eds) Mental health and wellbeing through schools: the way forward (Submitted)
Brighi A, Guarini A, Melotti G, Galli S, Genta ML (2012) Predictors of victimisation across direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying. Emot Behav Diffic 17:375–388
Bronfenbrenner U (1977) Towards an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol 32:513–530
Carney J (2008) Perceptions of bullying and associated trauma during adolescence. Prof Sch Couns 11(3):179–188
Cassidy T, Taylor L (2005) Coping and psychological distress as a function of the bully victim dichotomy in older children. Soc Psychol Educ 8:249–262
Chartier M, Stoep AV, McCauley E, Herting JR, Tracy M, Lymp J (2008) Passive versus active parental permission: implications for the ability of school-based depression screening to reach youth at risk. J Sch Health 78:157–164
Cook CR, Williams KR, Guerra NG, Kim TE, Sadek S (2010) Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. Sch Psychol Q 25:65–83
Cornell DG, Bandyopadhyay S (2010) The assessment of bullying. In: Jimerson SR, Swearer SM, Espelage DL (eds) Handbook of bullying in schools: an international perspective. Routledge, New York, pp 265–276
Cross D, Shaw T, Hearn L, Epstein M, Monks H, Lester L, Thomas L (2009) Australian Covert Bullying Prevalence Study (ACBPS). Report prepared for the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR), Western Australia
Cross D et al (2011) Three-year results of the Friendly Schools whole-of-school intervention on children’s bullying behaviour. Br Edu Res J 37:105–129
Cross D, Shaw T, Hadwen K, Cardoso P, Slee P, Roberts C, Thomas L, Barnes A (2015) Longitudinal impact of the Cyber Friendly Schools program on adolescents’ cyberbullying behaviour (Submitted)
Dempsey AG, Sulkowski ML, Dempsey J, Storch EA (2011) Has cyber technology produced a new group of peer aggressors? Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 14:297–302
Dooley J, Gradinger P, Strohmeier D, Cross D, Spiel C (2010) Cyber-victimisation: the association between help-seeking behaviours and self-reported emotional symptoms in Australia and Austria. Aust J Guid Couns 20:194–209
Erdur-Baker Ö (2010) Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media Soc 12:109–125
Espelage DL, Rao MA, Craven RG (2013) Theories of Cyberbullying. In: Bauman S, Cross D, Walker J (eds) Principles of cyberbullying research: definitions, measures, and methodology. Routledge, New York
Gámez-Guadix M, Orue I, Smith PK, Calvete E (2013) Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance Use, and problematic internet Use among adolescents. J Adolesc Health 53:446–452
Goldbaum S, Craig WM, Pepler D, Connolly J (2003) Developmental trajectories of victimization—identifying risk and protective factors. J Appl Sch Psychol 19:139–156
Goodman R (1997) The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 38:581–586
Helsen M, Vollebergh W, Meeus W (2000) Social support from parents and friends and emotional problems in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 29:319–335
Hemphill SA, Kotevski A, Tollit M, Smith R, Herrenkohl TI, Toumbourou JW, Catalano RF (2012) Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. J Adolesc Health 51:59–65
Hunter SC, Boyle JM, Warden D (2004) Help seeking amongst child and adolescent victims of peer-aggression and bullying: the influence of school-stage, gender, victimisation, appraisal, and emotion. Br J Educ Psychol 74:375–390
Jose PE, Kljakovic M, Scheib E, Notter O (2012) The Joint Development of Traditional Bullying and Victimization With Cyber Bullying and Victimization in Adolescence. J Res Adolesc 22:301–309. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00764.x
Kowalski RM, Limber SP (2013) Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health 53:S13–S20
Kowalski RM, Morgan CA, Limber SP (2012) Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of cyberbullying. Sch Psychol Int 33:505–519
Kowalski RM, Giumetti GW, Schroeder AN, Lattanner MR (2014) Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol Bull 140:1073–1137
Ladd G, Kochenderfer B, Coleman C (1996) Friendship quality as a predictor of young children’s early school adjustment. Child Dev 67:1103–1118
Landstedt E, Persson S (2014) Bullying, cyberbullying, and mental health in young people. Scand J Public Health 42:1–7
Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K (2010) Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington
Lester L, Cross D (2015) Do emotional and behavioural difficulties in primary school predict adolescent bullying trajectories? Emot Behav Diffic (In press)
Lester L, Cross D, Dooley J, Shaw T (2013) Developmental trajectories of adolescent victimization: predictors and outcomes. Soc Influ 8(2–3):107–130
Li Q (2007) New bottle but old wine: a research of cyberbullying in schools. Comput Hum Behav 23:1777–1791
Li Q, Smith PK, Cross D (2012) Research into cyberbullying: context. In: Li Q, Cross D, Smith PK (eds) Cyberbullying in the global playground: research from international perspectives. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 3–12
Livingstone S, Haddon L (2009) EU Kids Online. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/J Psychol 217:236
O’Brennan LM, Furlong MJ (2010) Relations between students’ perceptions of school connectedness and peer victimization. J Sch Violence 9:375–391
Olweus D (1996) The Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire Bergen, Norway: Mimeo,Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL), University of Bergen
Ortega R, Elipe P, Mora-Merchán JA, Calmaestra J, Vega E (2009) The emotional impact on victims of traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/J Psychol 217:197–204
Ortega R et al (2012) The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: a European cross-national study. Aggress Behav 38:342–356
Patchin JW, Hinduja S (2006) Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: a preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence Juv Justice 4:148–169
Patchin JW, Hinduja S (2012) Cyberbullying prevention and response: expert perspectives. Routledge, Thousand Oaks
Perren S, Dooley J, Shaw T, Cross D (2010) Bullying in school and cyberspace: associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 4:1–10
Raskauskas J, Stoltz AD (2007) Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Dev Psychol 43:564–575
Reijntjes A, Kamphuis JH, Prinzie P, Telch MJ (2010) Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse Negl 34:244–252
Resnick MD et al (1997) Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA 278:823–832
Riebel J, Jaeger RS, Fischer UC (2009) Cyberbullying in Germany–an exploration of prevalence, overlapping with real life bullying and coping strategies. Psychol Sci Q 51:298–314
Rigby K, Slee P (1998) The Peer Relations Questionnaire. The Professional Reading Guide for Educational Administrators, Point Lonsdale, VIC
Riittakerttu K, Fröjd S, Marttunen M (2010) Involvement in bullying and depression in a 2-year follow-up in middle adolescence. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19:45–55. doi:10.1007/s00787-009-0039-2
Schultze-Krumbholz A, Jäkel A, Schultze M, Scheithauer H (2012) Emotional and behavioural problems in the context of cyberbullying: a longitudinal study among German adolescents. Emot Behav Diffic 17:329–345
Sinclair KO, Bauman S, Poteat VP, Koenig B, Russell ST (2012) Cyber and bias-based harassment: associations with academic, substance use, and mental health problems. J Adolesc Health 50:521–523
Slonje R, Smith PK (2008) Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? Scand J Psychol 49:147–154
Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N (2008) Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49:376–385
Solberg M, Olweus D (2003) Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggress Behav 29:239–268. doi:10.1002/ab.10047
Sticca F, Ruggieri S, Alsaker F, Perren S (2013) Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 23:52–67
Tokunaga RS (2010) Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Hum Behav 26:277–287
Williams KR, Guerra NG (2007) Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. J Adolesc Health 41:S14–S21
Williford A, Elledge LC, Boulton AJ, DePaolis KJ, Little TD, Salmivalli C (2013) Effects of the KiVa Antibullying Program on cyberbullying and cybervictimization frequency among Finnish youth. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 42:820–833
Acknowledgments
We thank the school staff who coordinated and supported the Cyber Friendly Schools Project study, and the students who participated in the research. We acknowledge the study’s investigators and the many Child Health Promotion Research Centre staff and volunteers who contributed to this project from 2010 to 2012. The study was supported by the Western Australian Health Promotion Foundation (Healthway; research grant 18940).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the special issue “Communication Technology, Media Use and the Health of Our Kids”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cross, D., Lester, L. & Barnes, A. A longitudinal study of the social and emotional predictors and consequences of cyber and traditional bullying victimisation. Int J Public Health 60, 207–217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0655-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0655-1