Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 189–198 | Cite as

Supportive communication with parents moderates the negative effects of electronic media use on life satisfaction during adolescence

  • Meyran Boniel-Nissim
  • Izabela Tabak
  • Joanna Mazur
  • Alberto Borraccino
  • Fiona Brooks
  • Rob Gommans
  • Winfried van der Sluijs
  • Emese Zsiros
  • Wendy Craig
  • Yossi Harel-Fisch
  • Emily Finne
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the impact of electronic media (EM) use on teenagers’ life satisfaction (LS) and to assess the potential moderating effect of supportive communication with parents (SCP).

Methods

Data were drawn from the cross-national Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study (2009/2010) in Canada, England, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Israel, The Netherlands, Poland and Scotland. Sample size: 53,973 students aged 11–15 years.

Results

More hours per day spent on the computer were associated with lower LS; more EM communication with friends with higher LS. This relationship became negative if EM use reached and exceeded a certain threshold. SCP moderated the effect of EM communication with friends, but not computer use for the total sample. SCP seems to be more important than computer use or EM communication with friends for LS and it seems to buffer negative effects of EM use.

Conclusions

Communication with parents seems to buffer the negative effects of EM use on LS during adolescence. Higher computer use was related to lower LS, but “optimal” frequency of EM communication with friends was country specific.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Adolescents Computer use Supportive communication with parents Cross-national study 

References

  1. Adiele I, Olatokun W (2014) Prevalence and determinants of internet addiction among adolescents. Comput Hum Behav 31:100–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics (2001) Children, adolescents, and television. Pediatrics 107(2):423–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonogeorgos G, Panagiotakos DB, Grigoropoulou D, Papadimitriou A, Anthracopoulos M, Nicolaidou P, Priftis KN (2013) The mediating effect of parents’ educational status on the association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and childhood obesity: the PANACEA study. Int J Public Health 58(3):401–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker MW, Alzahabi R, Hopwood CJ (2013) Media multitasking is associated with symptoms of depression and social anxiety. Cyberpsychol Behav Social Netw 16:132–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson J (2011) Psychiatrist says video games are influencing youth and not for the better. The day. http://www.theday.com/article/20110602/NWS01/306029399
  6. Boyce W, Dallago L, Settertobulte W (2004) Socioeconomic inequality. In: Currie C, Roberts C, Morgan A, Smith R, Samdal O, Rasmussen Barnekow V (eds) Young people’s health in context: international report from the HBSC 2001/02 survey. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, pp 13–25Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw J, Keung A, Rees G, Goswami H (2011) Children’s subjective well-being: international comparative perspectives. Child Youth Serv Rev 33(4):548–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks FM, Magnusson J, Spencer N, Morgan A (2012) Adolescent multiple risk behaviour: an asset approach to the role of family, school and community. J Public Health (Oxf) 34(Suppl 1):i48–i56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chahal H, Fung C, Kuhle S, Veugelers PJ (2013) Availability and night-time use of electronic entertainment and communication devices are associated with short sleep duration and obesity among Canadian children. Pediatr Obes 8(1):42–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Currie C, Zanotti C, Morgan A, Currie D, Looze de M, Roberts C, Samdal O, Smith ORF, Barnekow V (eds) (2012) Social determinants of health and well-being among young people: health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2009/2010 survey. Health policy for children and adolescents, vol 6. WHO Regional Office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  11. Deniz L (2010) Excessive internet use and loneliness among secondary school students. J Instr Psychol 37:20–23Google Scholar
  12. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 49(1):71–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Elgar FJ, Craig W, Trites SJ (2013) Family dinners, communication, and mental health in Canadian adolescents. J Adolesc Health 52(4):433–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferguson CJ, Muñoz ME, Garza A, Galindo M (2014) Concurrent and prospective analyses of peer, television and social media influences on body dissatisfaction, eating disorder symptoms and life satisfaction in adolescent girls. J Youth Adolesc 43(1):1–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Finne E, Bucksch J, Lampert T, Kolip P (2013) Physical activity and screen-based media use: cross-sectional associations with health-related quality of life and the role of body satisfaction in a representative sample of German adolescents. Health Psychol Behav Med 1(1):15–30CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Helsen M, Vollebergh W, Meeus W (2000) Social support from parents and friends and emotional problems in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 29(3):319–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iannotti RJ, Janssen I, Haug E, Kololo H, Annaheim B, Borraccino A (2009) Interrelationships of adolescent physical activity, screen-based sedentary behaviour, and social and psychological health. Int J Public Health 54(S2):191–198CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson LA, von Eye A, Fitzgerald HE, Witt EA, Zhao Y (2011) Internet use, videogame playing and cell phone use as predictors of children’s body mass index (BMI), body weight, academic performance, and social and overall self-esteem. Comput Human Behav 27(1):599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson GM (2010) Internet use and child development: validation of the ecological techno-subsystem. Educ Techno Soc 13(1):176–185Google Scholar
  20. Kuntsche E, Simons-Morton B, ter Bogt T, Queija IS, Tinoco VM, de Matos Gaspar, Margarida Santinello M, Lenzi M (2009) Electronic media communication with friends from 2002 to 2006 and links to face-to-face contacts in adolescence: an HBSC study in 31 European and North American countries and regions. Int J Public Health 54(Suppl 2):243–250CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lacy KE, Allender SE, Kremer PJ, Silva-Sanigorski AM, Millar LM, Moodie ML, Mathews LB, Malakellis M, Swinburn BA (2012) Screen time and physical activity behaviours are associated with health-related quality of life in Australian adolescents. Qual Life Res 21(6):1085–1099CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Levin KA, Currie C (2010) Family structure, mother–child communication, father–child communication, and adolescent life satisfaction: a cross-sectional multilevel analysis. Health Educ 110(3):152–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levin KA, Currie C (2013) Reliability and validity of an adapted version of the Cantril ladder for use with adolescent samples. Soc Indic Res:1–17Google Scholar
  24. Livingstone S, Haddon L, Görzig A, Ólafsson K (2011) EU Kids online final report. http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline
  25. Manago AM, Taylor T, Greenfield PM (2012) Me and my 400 friends: the anatomy of college students’ Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Dev Psychol 48(2):369–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mathers M, Canterford L, Olds T, Hesketh K, Ridley K, Wake M (2009) Electronic media use and adolescent health and well-being: cross-sectional community study. Acad Pediatr 9(5):307–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mesch GS (2003) The family and the internet: the Israeli case. Soc Sci Q 84(4):1038–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moreno C, Sánchez-Queija I, Muñoz-Tinoco V, Matos MG, Dallago L, Bogt TT, Camacho I, Rivera F (2009) Cross-national associations between parent and peer communication and psychological complaints. Int J Public Health 54(S2):235–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mößle T, Kleimann M, Rehbein F, Pfeiffer C (2010) Media use and school achievement—boys at risk? Br J Dev Psychol 28(3):699–725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ofcom (2014) Children and parents: media use and attitudes report. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/media-use-attitudes-14/Childrens_2014_Report.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2014
  31. Page AS, Cooper AR, Griew P, Jago R (2010) Children’s screen viewing is related to psychological difficulties irrespective of physical activity. Pediatrics 126(5):e1011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Park N (2004) The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 591(1):25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Piko BF, Hamvai C (2010) Parent, school and peer-related correlates of adolescents’ life satisfaction. Child Youth Serv Rev 32(10):1479–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Purcell K (2013) 10 Things to know about how teens use technology. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/07/10/10-things-to-know-about-how-teens-use-technology/
  35. Racine EF, DeBate RD, Gabriel KP, High RR (2011) The relationship between media use and psychological and physical assets among third- to fifth-grade girls. J Sch Health 81(12):749–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosen LD, Lim AF, Felt J, Carrier LM, Cheever NA, Lara-Ruiz JM, Mendoza JS, Rokkum J (2014) Media and technology use predicts ill-being among children, preteens and teenagers independent of the negative health impacts of exercise and eating habits. Comput Human Behav 35:364–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steinberg L, Morris AS (2001) Adolescent development. J Cogn Educ Psychol 2(1):55–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stepanikova I, Nie NH, He X (2010) Time on the internet at home, loneliness, and life satisfaction: evidence from panel time-diary data. Comput Human Behav 26(3):329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sweetser P, Wyeth P (2005) Gameflow. Comput Entertain 3(3):3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tabak I, Jodkowska M, Oblacińska A (2013) Family meals, support and communication within the family as predictors of teenagers’ subjective health and life satisfaction. Pediatr Pol 6(88):533–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Torsheim T, Eriksson L, Schnohr CW, Hansen F, Bjarnason T, Välimaa R (2010) Screen-based activities and physical complaints among adolescents from the Nordic countries. BMC Public Health 10(1):324CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Uttal DH, Meadow NG, Tipton E, Hand LL, Alden AR, Warren C, Newcombe NS (2013) The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychol Bull 139(2):352–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Valkenburg PM, Peter J (2007) Online communication and adolescent well-being: testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. J Comput Mediat Commun 12(4):1169–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Valkenburg PM, Peter J (2009) Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: a decade of research. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valkenburg PM, Peter J (2011) Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. J Adolesc Health 48(2):121–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meyran Boniel-Nissim
    • 1
    • 2
  • Izabela Tabak
    • 3
  • Joanna Mazur
    • 3
  • Alberto Borraccino
    • 4
  • Fiona Brooks
    • 5
  • Rob Gommans
    • 6
  • Winfried van der Sluijs
    • 7
  • Emese Zsiros
    • 8
  • Wendy Craig
    • 9
  • Yossi Harel-Fisch
    • 10
  • Emily Finne
    • 11
  1. 1.Department of Counseling and Human DevelopmentUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Behavioral SciencesKinneret CollegeKinneretIsrael
  3. 3.Institute of Mother and ChildWarsawPoland
  4. 4.Department of Public Health and PaediatricsUniversity of TorinoTurinItaly
  5. 5.CRIPACCUniversity of HertfordshireHatfieldUK
  6. 6.Centre for Child and Adolescent StudiesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  7. 7.University of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  8. 8.National Institute of Child HealthBudapestHungary
  9. 9.Psychology DepartmentQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  10. 10.Bar Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael
  11. 11.WHO Collaborating Centre for Child and Adolescent Health PromotionSchool of Public Health, Bielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations