Skip to main content
Log in

Critical success factors for physical activity promotion through community partnerships

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives

To define key factors of effective evidence-based policy implementation for physical activity promotion by use of a partnership approach.

Methods

Using Parent and Harvey’s model for sport and physical activity community-based partnerships, we defined determinants of implementation based on 13 face-to-face interviews with network organisations and 39 telephone interviews with partner organisations. Furthermore, two quantitative data-sets (n = 991 and n = 965) were used to measure implementation.

Results

In total, nine variables were found to influence implementation. Personal contact was the most powerful variable since its presence contributed to success while its absence led to a negative outcome. Four contributed directly to success: political motive, absence of a metropolis, high commitment and more qualified staff. Four others resulted in a less successful implementation: absence of positive merger effects, exposure motive and governance, and dispersed leadership.

Conclusions

Community networks are a promising instrument for the implementation of evidence-based policies. However, determinants of both formation and management of partnerships influence the implementation success. During partnership formation, special attention should be given to partnership motives while social skills are of utmost importance for the management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agranoff R (2007) Managing within networks: adding value to public organizations. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak K (2009) Criteria of effectiveness in multiple cross-sectoral interorganizational relationships. Eval Program Plann 32:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker EA, Wilkerson R, Brennan LK (2012) Identifying the role of community partnerships in creating change to support active living. Am J Prev Med 43(5, S4):290–299. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballew P, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Heath GW, Kreuter MW (2010) Dissemination of effective physical activity interventions: are we applying the evidence? Health Educ Res 25(2):185–198. doi:10.1093/her/cyq003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baltzer M, Westerlund H, Backhans M, Melinder K (2011) Involvement and structure: a qualitative study of organizational change and sickness absence among women in the public sector in Sweden. BMC Public Health 11:318. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-318

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basurto X, Speer J (2012) Structuring the calibration of qualitative data as sets for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Field Method 24(2):155–174. doi:10.1177/1525822x11433998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzoli G et al (2003) Collaborative initiatives: where the rubber meets the road in community partnerships. Med Care Res Rev 60(4):63S–94S

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgian Federal Government (2010) Kerncijfers: statistisch overzicht van België 2012. In. http://statbel.fgov.be/

  • Brennan LK, Brownson RC, Hovmand P (2012) Evaluation of active living by design: implementation patterns across communities. Am J Prev Med 43(5, S4):351–366. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownson RC et al (2010) Assembling the puzzle for promoting physical activity in brazil: a social network analysis. J Phys Act Health 7:S242–S252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buchthal OV, Taniguchi N, Iskandar L, Maddock J (2013) Assessing state-level active living promotion using network analysis. J Phys Act Health 10(1):19–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I (2011) Wijken in Beweging “10.000 stappen Vlaanderen”: Evaluatierapport. Universiteit Gent, Gent, p 29

  • Caudle S (2007) Basic practices for homeland security regional partnerships. Public Manager 36(2):40–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford S (2012) What is the energy policy-planning network and who dominates it?: a network and QCA analysis of leading energy firms and organizations. Energ Policy 45:430–439. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cocker KA, De Bourdeaudhuij IM, Brown WJ, Cardon GM (2007) Effects of “10,000 steps ghent”—a whole-community intervention. Am J Prev Med 33(6):455–463. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Meur G (2006) MSDO/MDSO—beta version. In: Université Libre de Bruxelles. http://www.jchr.be/01/beta.htm

  • De Meur G, Bursens P, Gottcheiner A (2006) MSDO/MDSO Revisited for Public Policy Analysis. In: Rihoux B, Grimm H (eds) Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis. Springer US, New York, pp 67–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eglene O, Dawes S, Schneider C (2007) Authority and leadership patterns in public sector knowledge networks. Am Rev Public Adm 37(1):91–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemish Institute for Health Promotion and Illness Prevention (2012) Logo’s in Vlaanderen en Brussel. In. http://www.vlaamselogos.be/

  • Frisby W, Thibault L, Kikulis L (2004) The organizational dynamics of under-managed partnerships in leisure service departments. Leisure Stud 23(2):109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U (2012) Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 380(9838):247–257. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman A, Johnston WJ (2010) The impact of coercive and non-coercive forms of influence on trust, commitment, and compliance in supply chains. Ind Market Manag 39(3):519–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Head B (2008) Assessing network-based collaborations. Public Manag Rev 10(6):733–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson B (2004) Analysing network partnerships. Public Manag Rev 6(1):75–94. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham C (2003) Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Manag Rev 5(3):401–423. doi:10.1080/1471903032000146964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast R, Mandell MR, Brown K, Woolcock G (2004) Network structures: working differently and changing expectations. Public Admin Rev 64(3):363–371. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00380.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn E-H, Koppenjan J (2000) Public management and policy networks. Public Manag Rev 2(2):135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandell MP, Keast R (2008) Evaluating the effectiveness of interorganizational relations through networks. Public Manag Rev 10(6):715–731. doi:10.1080/14719030802423079

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister DJ (1995) Affect-based and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad Manage J 38(1):24–59. doi:10.2307/256727

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire M, Agranoff R (2007) Answering the big questions, asking the bigger questions: expanding the public network management empirical research agenda. Paper presented at the 9th Public Management Research Conference, Tucson, Arizona, October 25–27

  • Mohr J, Spekman R (1994) Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict-resolution techniques. Strategic Manage J 15(2):135–152. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150205

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Marketing 58(3):20–38. doi:10.2307/1252308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C (1990) Determinants of interorganizational relationships - integration and future-directions. Acad Manage Rev 15(2):241–265. doi:10.2307/258156

  • Parent M, Harvey J (2009) Towards a management model for sport and physical activity community-based partnerships. Eur Sport Manag Q 9(1):23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani A, Rivera-Santos M (2011) Clearing a path through the forest: a meta-review of interorganizational relationships. J Manage 37(4):1108–1136

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra DC et al (2011) How does network structure affect partnerships for promoting physical activity? evidence from Brazil and Colombia. Soc Sci Med 73(9):1365–1370. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Provan K, Huang K, Milward B (2009) The evolution of structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed health and human services network. J Publ Adm Res Theor 19(4):873–893. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raine KD et al (2010) Reflections on community-based population health intervention and evaluation for obesity and chronic disease prevention: the healthy alberta communities project. Int J Public Health 55(6):679–686. doi:10.1007/s00038-010-0187-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ring PS, Vandeven AH (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad Manage Rev 19(1):90–118. doi:10.2307/258836

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussos ST, Fawcett SB (2000) A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Publ Health 21(1):369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutten A (2012) Evidence-based policy revisited: orientation towards the policy process and a public health policy science. Int J Public Health 57(3):455–457. doi:10.1007/s00038-011-0321-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soda G, Furnari S (2012) Exploring the topology of the plausible: fs/QCA counterfactual analysis and the plausible fit of unobserved organizational configurations. Strateg Organ 10(3):285–296. doi:10.1177/1476127012452826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas MM, Hodge W, Smith BJ (2009) Building capacity in local government for integrated planning to increase physical activity: evaluation of the VicHealth MetroACTIVE program. Health Promot Int 24(4):353–362. doi:10.1093/heapro/dap035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turrini A, Christofoli D, Frosini F, Nasi G (2010) Networking literature about determinants effectiveness. Public Admin 88(2):528–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Acker R, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Cocker K, Klesges LM, Cardon G (2011) The impact of disseminating the whole-community project ‘10,000 steps’: a RE-AIM analysis. Bmc Public Health 11:3

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton DER, Nicol CW, Bredin SSD (2006) Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J 174(6):801–809. doi:10.1503/cmaj.051351

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffie Lucidarme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lucidarme, S., Marlier, M., Cardon, G. et al. Critical success factors for physical activity promotion through community partnerships. Int J Public Health 59, 51–60 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0527-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0527-5

Keywords

Navigation