A scoping review of unintended harm associated with public health interventions: towards a typology and an understanding of underlying factors
- 3.7k Downloads
Unintended harm theory as related to public health interventions (PHI) is under developed, with harm evaluation and reporting often absent or incomplete. This review presents a typology for, and underlying factors linked to, PHI-associated unintended harm.
This scoping review was conducted electronically and includes articles from 1992 to June of 2013. Out of 2,490 originally identified titles, 26 full-text articles were included that discussed unintended harm associated with PHI. An iterative data analysis process was utilized to identify both a typology and underlying factors associated with unintended harm.
A typology of PHI-associated unintended harm was identified: (1) physical; (2) psychosocial; (3) economic; (4) cultural and (5) environmental. Five underlying factors associated with PHI unintended harm emerged: (1) limited and/or poor quality evidence; (2) prevention of one extreme leads to another (boomerang effects); (3) lack of community engagement; (4) ignoring root causes; and (5) higher-income country PHI implementation in a lower- or middle-income country.
PHI planning and evaluation frameworks may benefit from the consideration and potential incorporation of the unintended harm typology and underlying factors.
KeywordsPublic health interventions Unintended harm Unanticipated consequences Typology Underlying factors Evaluation
- Bronfenbrenner U (1979) The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Brown VA, Harris JA, Russell JY (2010) Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Christakis NA (2009) Only connect indirectly doing harm. Brit Med J 339. doi:10.1136/bmj.b3980
- Cooper HM, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (2009) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd edn. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Davies M, Macdowall W (2006) Health promotion theory. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
- Feinberg J (1984) Harm to others. The moral limits of the crimimal law, vol 1. Oxford University Press, New York, p 11Google Scholar
- Jefferson T, Rivetti A, Di Pietrantonj C, Demicheli V, Ferroni E (2012) Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (8). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub4
- Marmot M (2006) Social determinants of health. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Merriam-Webster (2013a) Economic definition. In. (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/economic). Accessed 31 May 2013
- Merriam-Webster (2013b) Environmental definition. In. (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/environment). Accessed 31 May 2013
- Merriam-Webster (2013c) Psychosocial definition. In. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/psychosocial Accessed 31 May 2013
- Mill J (1859) On liberty. In: Wishy B (ed) Prefaces to liberty: selected writings. University Press America, LanhamGoogle Scholar
- NICE (2013) Public Health Guidance: Scope. National Institute for Health and Clinical ExcellenceGoogle Scholar
- Oxford (2013) Definition of harm in english. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/harm?q=harm. Accessed 9 Sept 2013
- RCHI Roshan Cultural Heritage Institute (2013) Culture definition. In. (http://www.roshan-institute.org/474552). Accessed 31 May 2013
- WHO (2013) In. http://www.who.int/hia/evidence/doh/en/. Accessed 31 May 2013
- WHO (2010) A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. In: WHO (ed) Social determinants of health discussion paper 2. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Wolitski RJ, Parsons JT, Gomez CA, Teams SaSS (2004) Prevention with HIV-seropositive men who have sex with men—lessons from the Seropositive Urban Men’s Study (SUMS) and the Seropositive Urban Men’s Intervention Trial (SUMIT). Jaids-J Acq Imm Def 37:S101–S109Google Scholar
- Zimet GD, Mays RM, Sturm LA, Ravert AA, Perkins SM, Juliar BE (2005) Parental attitudes about sexually transmitted infection vaccination for their adolescent children. Arch Pediat Adol Med 159(2):132–137Google Scholar