Abstract
Objectives
This review evaluates existing co-benefit models for emission and health outcomes of counterfactual scenarios of reduced meat consumption at a population level.
Methods
A novel assessment process was developed, combining selected measures from the Cochrane Review quality assessment tools, from the PRISMA checklist, and model quality measures identified by the authors during the preliminary phases of the review process.
Results
Four emission models and three health outcome models have been identified which show great variation in model characteristics and qualities. The estimated counterfactual scenario emission effects presented in the included studies ranged from a reduction of <3–30 % and reduction in the burden of disease ranged from 1 to 16 %. Meta-analysis could not be conducted due to high heterogeneity of model characteristics.
Conclusions
All co-benefit studies estimated that reducing population meat consumption could reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of disease. However, important attention must be paid to nutrition balance and a systematic approach in input and output attribute parameters is recommended for better model quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akhtar AZ, Greger M, Ferdowsian H, Frank E (2009) Health professionals’ roles in animal agriculture, climate change, and human health. Am J Prev Med 36(2):182–187
Aston LM, Smith JN, Powles JW (2012) Impact of a reduced red and processed meat dietary pattern on disease risks and greenhouse gas emissions in the UK: a modelling study. BMJ Open 2(5)
Audsley E, Chatterton J, Graves A, Morris J, Murphy-Bokern D, Pearn K, Sandars D, Williams A (2010) Food, land and greenhouse gases:The effect of changes in UK food consumption on land requirements and greenhouse gas emissions, a report prepared for the United Kingdom’s Government’s Committee on climate change, pp 1–158
DCCEE (2011) Australia’s emissions. http://www.climatechange.gov.au/climate-change/emissions.aspx. Accessed 16/10/2011
de Vries M, de Boer IJM (2010) Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livest Sci 128:1–11
EPA (2007) State of the Environmental Report: Western Australia 2007. Environmental Protection Authority, Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth, Western Australia website, Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth, Western Australia. http://www.soe.wa.gov.au/. Accessed 19/10/2011
Eurobarometer (2011) Climate change. European Commission
Ezzati M, Lopez A, Rodgers A, Murray C (2004) Ch 25 Comparative quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected risk factors, vol 1. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 2129–2140
Ezzati M, Hoorn SV, Lopez AD, Danaei G, Rodgers A, Mathers CD, Murray CLJ (2006) Ch 4 Comparative quantification of mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected risk factors. In: Global burden of disease and risk factors. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC
Færgeman O (2008) Climate change, disease and public health. Ugeskr Laeger 170(35):2667–2668
Færgeman O, Østergaard L (2009) Climate change, food production and human health (Klimaforandringer, fødevareproduktion og human sundhed). Ugeskrift for Laeger 171(44):3181–3184
Friel S, Dangour AD, Garnett T, Lock K, Chalabi Z, Roberts I, Butler A, Butler CD, Waage J, McMichael AJ, Haines A (2009) Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture. Lancet 374(December):2016–2025
Gold M (2004) The global benefits of eating less meat. Compassion in World Farming Trust, Petersfield
Haines A (2012) Sustainable policies to improve health and prevent climate change. Soc Sci Med 74(5):680–683. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.008
Hartung E (2000) Quantify airborne emissions from buildings, stores and land application greenhouse gas emissions from animal husbandry, sustainable animal production workshops discussion
Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Thompson R, Sills D, Roberts FG, Moore H, Davey Smith G (2011) Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD002137. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002137.pub2
Hoorn S, Ezzati M, Rodgers A, Lopez A, Murray C (2004) Estimating attributable burden of disease from exposure and hazard. In: Ezzati M, Lopez A, Rodgers A, Murray C (eds) Comparative quantification of health risks: Global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected risk factors. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 2129–2140
Hu FB, Manson JE, Willett WC (2001) Types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr 20:5–19
Jakobsen MU, O’Reilly EJ, Heitmann BL, Pereira MA (2009) Major types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 89(5):1425–1432
Larsson SC, Virtamo J, Wolk A (2011a) Red meat consumption and risk of stroke in Swedish men. Am J Clin Nutr 94:417–421
Larsson SC, Virtamo J, Wolk A (2011b) Red meat consumption and risk of stroke in Swedish women. Stroke J Cerebral Circ 42(2):324–329
Lindeberg S (2012) Dietary shifts and human health: cancer and cardiovascular disease in a sustainable world. J Gastrointest Cancer 43(1):8–12
Lloyd-Williams F, O’Flaherty M, Mwatsama M, Birt C, Ireland R, Capewell S (2008) Estimating the cardiovascular mortality burden attributable to the European Common Agricultural Policy on dietary saturated fats. Bull World Health Organ 86:535–541
Luers AL (2007) How to avoid dangerous climate change. http://www.ucsusa.org/publications/catalyst/dangerous-climate-change.html. Accessed 1/6/2012
McMichael AJ, Powles JW, Butler CD, Uauy R (2007) Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. Lancet 370(9594):1253–1263
Micha R, Wallace SK, Mozaffarian D (2010) Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus. Circulation 121:2271–2283
Michaelowa A, Dransfeld B (2008) Greenhouse gas benefits of fighting obesity. Ecol Econ 66(2–3):1–24
Mozaffarian D, Micha R, Wallace S (2010) Effects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med 7(3):e1000252. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000252
Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, Schulze MB, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB (2011) Red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of U.S. Adults and an updated meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 94(4):1088–1096
Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, Schulze MB, Manson JAE, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hu FB (2012) Red meat consumption and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies. Arch Intern Med 172(7):555
Parker CL (2011) Slowing global warming: benefits for patients and the planet. Am Fam Phys 84(3):271–278
Roberts I (2009) The health co-benefits of climate change policies: doctors have a responsibility to future generations. Clin Med J R Coll Phys Lond 9(3):212–213
Roberts I, Stott R (2010) Doctors and climate change. BMJ 341:c6357
Scarborough P, Allender S, Clarke D, Wickramasinghe K, Rayner M (2012a) Modelling the health impact of environmentally sustainable dietary scenarios in the UK. Eur J Clin Nutr 66(6):710–715
Scarborough P, Nnoaham K, Clarke D, Rayner M, Capewell S (2012b) Modelling the impact of a healthy diet on cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health 66:420–426
Scollan N, Moran D, Kim EJ, Thomas C (2010) The environmental impact of meat production systems, report to the international meat secretariat. UK
Sinha R, Cross AJ, Graubard BI, Leitzmann MF, Schatzkin A (2009) Meat intake and mortality: a prospective study of over half a million people. Arch Intern Med 169(6):562–571
Truelove HB, Parks C (2012) Perceptions of behaviors that cause and mitigate global warming and intentions to perform these behaviors. J Environ Psychol 32(3):246–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.002
Tukker A, Goldbohm RA, De Koning A, Verheijden M, Kleijn R, Wolf O, Pérez-Domínguez I, Rueda-Cantuche JM (2011) Environmental impacts of changes to healthier diets in Europe. Ecol Econ 70(10):1776–1788
WHO (2003) Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. Technical report series 916. World Health Organization, Geneva
Wyness L, Weichselbaum E, O’Connor A, Williams EB, Benelam B, Riley H, Stanner S (2011) Red meat in the diet: an update. Nutr Bull 36:34–77
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank John Moss for his suggestion of conducting a systematic review of co-benefit studies in reducing meat consumption, providing website links to well-known systematic review guidelines and giving comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the special issue: “Environment and Health Reviews”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yip, C.S.C., Crane, G. & Karnon, J. Systematic review of reducing population meat consumption to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and obtain health benefits: effectiveness and models assessments. Int J Public Health 58, 683–693 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0484-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0484-z