International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 143–156

Public acceptance of euthanasia in Europe: a survey study in 47 countries

  • Joachim Cohen
  • Paul Van Landeghem
  • Nico Carpentier
  • Luc Deliens
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

In recent years, the European euthanasia debate has become more intense, and the practice was legalized in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg. We aimed to determine the current degree of public acceptance of euthanasia across Europe and investigate what factors explain differences.

Methods

Data were derived from the 2008 wave of the European Values Survey (EVS), conducted in 47 European countries (N = 67,786, response rate = 69 %). Acceptance of euthanasia was rated on a 1–10 scale.

Results

Relatively high acceptance was found in a small cluster of Western European countries, including the three countries that have legalized euthanasia and Denmark, France, Sweden and Spain. In a large part of Europe public acceptance was relatively low to moderate. Comparison with the results of the previous EVS wave (1999) suggests a tendency towards a polarization in Europe, with most of Western Europe becoming more permissive and most of Eastern Europe becoming less permissive.

Conclusions

There is roughly a West-East division in euthanasia acceptance among the European public, making a pan-European policy approach to the issue difficult.

Keywords

Euthanasia Public opinion Cross-national comparison Survey Eastern Europe Western Europe 

References

  1. Bachman JG, Alcser KH, Doukas DJ et al (1996) Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia. N Engl J Med 334(5):303–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bulow HH, Sprung CL, Reinhart K et al (2008) The worldʼs major religionsʼ points of view on end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 34(3):423–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell CS (2000) Euthanasia and religion. UNESCO Courier 53(1):37–39Google Scholar
  4. Carlson P (1998) Self-perceived health in East and West Europe: another European health divide. Soc Sci Med 46(10):1355–1366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson P (2004) The European health divide: a matter of financial or social capital? Soc Sci Med 59(9):1985–1992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen J, Marcoux I, Bilsen J et al (2006a) European public acceptance of euthanasia: socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries. Soc Sci Med 63(3):743–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen J, Marcoux I, Bilsen J et al (2006b) Trends in acceptance of euthanasia among the general public in 12 European countries (1981–1999). Eur J Public Health 16:663–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen J, van Delden J, Mortier F et al (2008) Influence of physiciansʼ life stances on attitudes to end-of-life decisions and actual end-of-life decision-making in six countries. J Med Ethics 34(4):247–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crumley B (2008) French Euthanasia case rumbles on. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1726787,00.html
  10. De Moor R (1995) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg University Press, TilburgGoogle Scholar
  11. deCesare MA (2000) Public attitudes toward euthanasia and suicide for terminally ill persons: 1977 and 1996. Soc Biol 47(3–4):264–276Google Scholar
  12. Donovan GK (1997) Decisions at the end of life: Catholic tradition. Christ Bioethics 3(3):188–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EVS (2010a) European values study 2008, 4th wave, Integrated Dataset. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, Germany, ZA4800 Dataset Version 2.0.0 (2010-11-30). doi:10.4232/1.10188
  14. EVS (2010b) EVS 2008 guidelines and recommendations. GESIS-Technical Reports 2010/16. http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/
  15. EVS, GESIS (2010): EVS 2008 Method Report. GESIS-Technical Reports 2010/17. http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/
  16. Ferreira N (2007) Latest legal and social developments in the euthanasia debate: bad moral consciences and political unrest. Med Law 26(2):387–407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Green-Pedersen C (2007) The conflict of conflicts in comparative perspective: Euthanasia as a political issue in Denmark, Belgium, and the Netherlands. Compar Politics 39(3):273–291Google Scholar
  18. Halman L, Luijkx R, van Zudert M (2005) Atlas of European values. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  19. Hevesi D (2008) Hugo Claus, one of Belgiumʼs most renowned authors, Dies at 78, New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  20. Holloway HD, Hayslip B, Murdock ME (1994) Measuring attitudes toward euthanasia. Omega (Westport) 30(1):53–65Google Scholar
  21. Jorgenson DE, Neubecker RC (1980) Euthanasia: a national survey of attitudes toward voluntary termination of life. Omega (Westport) 11(4):281–291Google Scholar
  22. Kelner MJ, Bourgeault IL (1993) Patient control over dying: responses of health care professionals. Soc Sci Med 36(6):757–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kopfensteiner TR (1996) Death with dignity: a Roman Catholic perspective. Linacre Q 63(4):64–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Laaksonen M, McAlister AL, Laatikainen T et al (2001) Do health behaviour and psychosocial risk factors explain the European east–west gap in health status? Eur J Public Health 11(1):65–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larue GA (1985) Euthanasia and religion. A survey of the attitudes of world religions to the right-to-die. The Hemlock Society, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  26. Leinbach RM (1993) Euthanasia attitudes of older persons: a cohort analysis. Res Aging 15(4):433–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oehmichen M, Meissner C (2003) Active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: the German discussion. Legal Medicine (Tokyo) 5(Suppl 1):S20–S28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rietjens JA, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD et al (2005) A comparison of attitudes towards end-of-life decisions: survey among the Dutch general public and physicians. Soc Sci Med 61(8):1723–1732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schroder C, Schmutzer G, Klaiberg A et al (2003) Attitudes towards professional euthanasia in the range between grement in the society and personal preferences—results of a representative examination of the German general population. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 53(8):334–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schroepfer TA, Noh H, Kavanaugh M (2009) The myriad strategies for seeking control in the dying process. Gerontologist 49(6):755–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seale C (2000) Changing patterns of death and dying. Soc Sci Med 51(6):917–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sikora J (2009) Religion and attitudes concerning euthanasia Australia in the 1990s. J Sociol 45(1):31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snelling PC (2004) Consequences count: against absolutism at the end of life. J Adv Nurs 46(4):350–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Suarez-Almazor ME, Belzile M, Bruera E (1997) Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a comparative survey of physicians, terminally ill cancer patients, and the general population. J Clin Oncol 15(2):418–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomka M (2002) Religious restoration in Eastern Europe—introduction. Social Compass 49(4):483–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tomka M (2004) Religious changes in central and eastern Europe. Revue D Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest 35(4):11–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joachim Cohen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paul Van Landeghem
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nico Carpentier
    • 3
    • 4
  • Luc Deliens
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.End-of-Life Care Research GroupGhent University, Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.SCOM, Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of LoughboroughLoughboroughUK
  5. 5.Department of Public and Occupational HealthEMGO Institute, VU University Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations