Abstract
Objectives
Introduction of ultrasound equipment has been associated with higher sex ratio (number of male live births divided by female live births) for some developing countries. So far, studies have solely focused in regions with a cultural preference for males, which may introduce misleading conclusions about the association between poverty and sex-selective abortions.
Methods
We analyzed poor Brazilian municipalities that either (a) did not have ultrasound equipment, or (b) had the introduction of ultrasound equipment for the first time. Propensity score matching was performed, resulting in 155 pairs of comparable municipalities.
Results
We found a sex ratio of 1.039 for municipalities that had the introduction of ultrasound equipment and of 1.047 for those that did not. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The use of the propensity score matching approach was successful in reducing bias.
Conclusions
Concerns about an association between local poverty and sex-selective abortions should not be a barrier against access to maternal technology. While sex-selective abortions are an important concern for some developing countries, they are not a specific characteristic of poverty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartkowski JP, Ramos-Wada AI, Ellison CG, Acevedo GA (2012) Faith, race-ethnicity and public policy preferences: religious schemas and abortion attitudes among U.S. latinos. J Sci Study Relig 51:343–358
Becker SO, Caliendo M (2007) Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects. Stata J 7:71–83
Bhat PNM, Zavier AJF (2007) Factors influencing the use of prenatal diagnostic techniques and the sex ratio at birth in India. Econ Pol Wkly 42:2292–2303
Burgess R, Zhuang J (2000) Modernisation and son preference. Development Economics discussion paper. DEDPS 29, London
Chiavegatto Filho ADP, Laurenti R (2012) The vulnerable male, or the sex ratio among fetal deaths in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública 28:720–728
CNES (2012a) Abrangência. Ministério da Saúde. http://cnes.datasus.gov.br/Info_Abrangencia.asp. Accessed 19 July 2012
CNES (2012b) Legislação. Ministério da Saúde. http://cnes.datasus.gov.br/Info_Legislacao.asp. Accessed 19 July 2012
Conniffe D, Gash V, O Connell PJ (2000) Evaluating state programmes: “natural experiments” and propensity scores. Econ Soc Rev 31:283–308
Dahl GB, Moretti E (2008) The demand for sons. Rev Econ Stud 75:1085–1120
Das Gupta M (1987) Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India. Popul Dev Rev 13:77–100
Das Gupta M (2010) Family systems, political systems, and Asia’s ‘missing girls’. Asian Popul Stud 6:123–152
Datasus (2012). Ministério da Saúde. http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.php. Accessed 19 July 2012
Di Renzo GC, Rosati A, Sarti RD, Cruciani L, Cutuli AM (2007) Does fetal sex affect pregnancy outcome? Gend Med 4:19–30
Diniz D (2008) Aborto e saúde pública: 20 anos de pesquisas no Brasil. Ministério da Saúde, Brasília
Edlund L, Lee C (2009) Son preference, sex selection and economic development: theory and evidence from South Korea. Columbia University, New York
Edwards H, Thomson N (2012) Social and practical implications of fetal sex determination using ultrasound. Ultrasound 20:49–53
Egan JFX, Campbell WA, Chapman A, Shamshirsaz AA, Gurram P, Benn PA (2011) Distortions of sex ratios at birth in the United States; evidence for prenatal gender selection. Prenat Diagn 31:560–565
Frost M (2011) Fertility and the economic value of children: evidence from Nepal. University of Southampton, Southampton
Fusco CLB, Silva RS, Andreoni S (2012) Unsafe abortion: social determinants and health inequities in a vulnerable population in São Paulo, Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública 48:709–719
Ganatra B (2008) Maintaining access to safe abortion and reducing sex ratio imbalances in Asia. Reprod Health Matters 16:90–98
Harris RD, Marks WM (2009) Compact ultrasound for improving maternal and perinatal care in low-resource settings. J Ultrasound in Med 28:1067–1076
Hudson VM, Den Boer AM (2004) Bare branches: the security implications of Asia’s surplus male population. MIT Press, Cambridge
IBGE (2012) Banco de dados agregados. Sistema IBGE de recuperação automática. http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/cd/cd2010universo.asp?o=7&i=P Accessed 19 July 2012
James WH (1987) The human sex ratio. Part 1: a review of the literature. Hum Biol 59:721–752
Junhong C (2001) Prenatal sex determination and sex-selective abortion in rural central China. Popul Dev Rev 27:259–281
Lai-wan CC, Eric B, Hoi-yan CC (2006) Attitudes to and practices regarding sex selection in China. Prenat Diagn 26:610–613
Li H, Zheng H (2009) Ultrasonography and sex ratios in China. Asian Econ Pol Rev 4:121–137
Löfstedt P, Shusheng L, Johansson A (2004) Abortion patterns and reported sex ratios at birth in rural Yunnan, China. Reprod Health Matters 12:86–95
Mammen K (2011) Father’s Time investments in children: do sons get more? J Popul Econ 24:839–871
Milanovic B (2007) Global inequality: patterns and explanations. In: Held D, Kaya A (eds) Globalization and inequality. Polity Press, Cambridge
Miller BD (2001) Female-selective abortion in Asia: patterns, policies, and debates. Am Anthropol 103:1083–1095
Navara KJ (2010) Programming of offspring sex ratios by maternal stress in humans: assessment of physiological mechanisms using a comparative approach. J Comp Physiol B 180:785–796
Normand SLT, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Ayanian JZ, Ryan TJ, Cleary PD, McNeil BJ (2001) Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 54:387–398
Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Levi F, Franceschi S (1998) Trends in male: female ratio among newborn infants in 29 countries from five continents. Hum Reprod 13:1394–1396
Ray JG, Henry DA, Urquia ML (2012) Sex ratios among Canadian liveborn infants of mothers from different countries. CMAJ 184:E492–E496
Rubin DB (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127:757–763
Sousa A, Lozano R, Gakidou E (2010) Exploring the determinants of unsafe abortion: improving the evidence base in Mexico. Health Policy Plan 25:300–310
Tucker JD, Henderson GE, Wang TF, Huang YY, Parish W, Pan SM, Chen XS, Cohen MS (2005) Surplus men, sex work, and the spread of HIV in China. AIDS 19:539
United Nations (2010) The millennium development goals report 2010. United Nations, New York
United Nations Population Fund (2010) UNFPA guidance note on prenatal sex selection. United Nations, New York
Victora CG, Aquino EML, Leal MC, Monteiro CA, Barros FC, Szwarcwald CL (2011) Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges. Lancet 377:1863–1876
World Bank (2012) Sex ratio at birth (females per 1,000 males). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.BRTH.MF. Accessed July 17 2012
World Health Organization (2011) Preventing gender-biased sex selection: an interagency statement OHCHR. WHO, Geneva
Wu Z, Viisainen K, Hemminki E (2006) Determinants of high sex ratio among newborns: a cohort study from rural Anhui province, China. Reprod Health Matters 14:172–180
Zhou C, Wang XL, Zhou XD, Hesketh T (2012) Son preference and sex-selective abortion in China: informing policy options. Int J Public Health 57:459–465
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiavegatto Filho, A.D.P., Kawachi, I. Are sex-selective abortions a characteristic of every poor region? Evidence from Brazil. Int J Public Health 58, 395–400 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0421-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0421-6