Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are sex-selective abortions a characteristic of every poor region? Evidence from Brazil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives

Introduction of ultrasound equipment has been associated with higher sex ratio (number of male live births divided by female live births) for some developing countries. So far, studies have solely focused in regions with a cultural preference for males, which may introduce misleading conclusions about the association between poverty and sex-selective abortions.

Methods

We analyzed poor Brazilian municipalities that either (a) did not have ultrasound equipment, or (b) had the introduction of ultrasound equipment for the first time. Propensity score matching was performed, resulting in 155 pairs of comparable municipalities.

Results

We found a sex ratio of 1.039 for municipalities that had the introduction of ultrasound equipment and of 1.047 for those that did not. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The use of the propensity score matching approach was successful in reducing bias.

Conclusions

Concerns about an association between local poverty and sex-selective abortions should not be a barrier against access to maternal technology. While sex-selective abortions are an important concern for some developing countries, they are not a specific characteristic of poverty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartkowski JP, Ramos-Wada AI, Ellison CG, Acevedo GA (2012) Faith, race-ethnicity and public policy preferences: religious schemas and abortion attitudes among U.S. latinos. J Sci Study Relig 51:343–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker SO, Caliendo M (2007) Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects. Stata J 7:71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat PNM, Zavier AJF (2007) Factors influencing the use of prenatal diagnostic techniques and the sex ratio at birth in India. Econ Pol Wkly 42:2292–2303

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess R, Zhuang J (2000) Modernisation and son preference. Development Economics discussion paper. DEDPS 29, London

  • Chiavegatto Filho ADP, Laurenti R (2012) The vulnerable male, or the sex ratio among fetal deaths in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública 28:720–728

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CNES (2012a) Abrangência. Ministério da Saúde. http://cnes.datasus.gov.br/Info_Abrangencia.asp. Accessed 19 July 2012

  • CNES (2012b) Legislação. Ministério da Saúde. http://cnes.datasus.gov.br/Info_Legislacao.asp. Accessed 19 July 2012

  • Conniffe D, Gash V, O Connell PJ (2000) Evaluating state programmes: “natural experiments” and propensity scores. Econ Soc Rev 31:283–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl GB, Moretti E (2008) The demand for sons. Rev Econ Stud 75:1085–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta M (1987) Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India. Popul Dev Rev 13:77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das Gupta M (2010) Family systems, political systems, and Asia’s ‘missing girls’. Asian Popul Stud 6:123–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datasus (2012). Ministério da Saúde. http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.php. Accessed 19 July 2012

  • Di Renzo GC, Rosati A, Sarti RD, Cruciani L, Cutuli AM (2007) Does fetal sex affect pregnancy outcome? Gend Med 4:19–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz D (2008) Aborto e saúde pública: 20 anos de pesquisas no Brasil. Ministério da Saúde, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlund L, Lee C (2009) Son preference, sex selection and economic development: theory and evidence from South Korea. Columbia University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards H, Thomson N (2012) Social and practical implications of fetal sex determination using ultrasound. Ultrasound 20:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan JFX, Campbell WA, Chapman A, Shamshirsaz AA, Gurram P, Benn PA (2011) Distortions of sex ratios at birth in the United States; evidence for prenatal gender selection. Prenat Diagn 31:560–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frost M (2011) Fertility and the economic value of children: evidence from Nepal. University of Southampton, Southampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusco CLB, Silva RS, Andreoni S (2012) Unsafe abortion: social determinants and health inequities in a vulnerable population in São Paulo, Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública 48:709–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganatra B (2008) Maintaining access to safe abortion and reducing sex ratio imbalances in Asia. Reprod Health Matters 16:90–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris RD, Marks WM (2009) Compact ultrasound for improving maternal and perinatal care in low-resource settings. J Ultrasound in Med 28:1067–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson VM, Den Boer AM (2004) Bare branches: the security implications of Asia’s surplus male population. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2012) Banco de dados agregados. Sistema IBGE de recuperação automática. http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/cd/cd2010universo.asp?o=7&i=P Accessed 19 July 2012

  • James WH (1987) The human sex ratio. Part 1: a review of the literature. Hum Biol 59:721–752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Junhong C (2001) Prenatal sex determination and sex-selective abortion in rural central China. Popul Dev Rev 27:259–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai-wan CC, Eric B, Hoi-yan CC (2006) Attitudes to and practices regarding sex selection in China. Prenat Diagn 26:610–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Zheng H (2009) Ultrasonography and sex ratios in China. Asian Econ Pol Rev 4:121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt P, Shusheng L, Johansson A (2004) Abortion patterns and reported sex ratios at birth in rural Yunnan, China. Reprod Health Matters 12:86–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mammen K (2011) Father’s Time investments in children: do sons get more? J Popul Econ 24:839–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic B (2007) Global inequality: patterns and explanations. In: Held D, Kaya A (eds) Globalization and inequality. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller BD (2001) Female-selective abortion in Asia: patterns, policies, and debates. Am Anthropol 103:1083–1095

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navara KJ (2010) Programming of offspring sex ratios by maternal stress in humans: assessment of physiological mechanisms using a comparative approach. J Comp Physiol B 180:785–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Normand SLT, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Ayanian JZ, Ryan TJ, Cleary PD, McNeil BJ (2001) Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 54:387–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Levi F, Franceschi S (1998) Trends in male: female ratio among newborn infants in 29 countries from five continents. Hum Reprod 13:1394–1396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray JG, Henry DA, Urquia ML (2012) Sex ratios among Canadian liveborn infants of mothers from different countries. CMAJ 184:E492–E496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin DB (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127:757–763

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa A, Lozano R, Gakidou E (2010) Exploring the determinants of unsafe abortion: improving the evidence base in Mexico. Health Policy Plan 25:300–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker JD, Henderson GE, Wang TF, Huang YY, Parish W, Pan SM, Chen XS, Cohen MS (2005) Surplus men, sex work, and the spread of HIV in China. AIDS 19:539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2010) The millennium development goals report 2010. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Fund (2010) UNFPA guidance note on prenatal sex selection. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Victora CG, Aquino EML, Leal MC, Monteiro CA, Barros FC, Szwarcwald CL (2011) Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges. Lancet 377:1863–1876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012) Sex ratio at birth (females per 1,000 males). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.BRTH.MF. Accessed July 17 2012

  • World Health Organization (2011) Preventing gender-biased sex selection: an interagency statement OHCHR. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Viisainen K, Hemminki E (2006) Determinants of high sex ratio among newborns: a cohort study from rural Anhui province, China. Reprod Health Matters 14:172–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C, Wang XL, Zhou XD, Hesketh T (2012) Son preference and sex-selective abortion in China: informing policy options. Int J Public Health 57:459–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiavegatto Filho, A.D.P., Kawachi, I. Are sex-selective abortions a characteristic of every poor region? Evidence from Brazil. Int J Public Health 58, 395–400 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0421-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0421-6

Keywords

Navigation