Abstract
Objective
To increase the understanding of how definitions of standards for housing design influence the proportion of dwellings not meeting the standards and the proportion of individuals defined as having accessibility problems.
Methods
The sample included old people and their dwellings in three European countries (N = 1,150). Frequencies and percentages were reported and empirical distribution functions were used.
Results
Depending on the functional profile and standards in question, the magnitude of influence of the standards differs in extent, e.g., the existing standard for door openings at the entrance (defined ≥75 cm) implied that the proportion of dwellings not meeting it was 11.3% compared to 64.4%, if the standard was set to ≥83 cm. The proportion of individuals defined as having accessibility problems for profiles not using mobility devices was 4–5, 57% for profiles using them and 1–3% for the total sample if the standard was set to 90 cm.
Conclusion
Research-based standard definitions for housing design are necessary to ensure that they actually lead to enhanced accessibility, which is a prerequisite for the independence and health of persons with functional limitations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson I, Ejlertsson G (eds) (2009) Folkhälsa som tvärvetenskap––möten mellan ämnen. Studentlitteratur, Lund (In Swedish)
Burns N (2004) Negotiating difference: disabled people’s experiences of house builders. Hous Stud 19:765–780
Christiansen CH, Townsend E (2004) Introduction to occupation the art and science of living. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Crews DE, Zavotka S (2006) Aging, disability and frailty: implications for universal design. J Physiol Anthropol 25:113–118
D’Souza C, Steinfeld E, Paquet V (2009) Functional reach abilities of wheeled mobility device users: toward inclusive design. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Inclusive Design, INCLUDE 2009, Royal College of Art, London
Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Haak M, Fänge A, Iwarsson S (2007) The multiple meaning of home as experienced by very old Swedish people. Scand J Occup Ther 14:25–33
Das B, Kozey JW (1999) Structural anthropometric measures for wheelchair mobile adults. Appl Ergon 30:385–390
Haak M, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Fänge A, Sixsmith J, Iwarsson S (2007) Home as the locus and origin for participation: experiences among very old Swedish people. OTJR: Occup Particip Health 27:95–103
Helle T, Nygren C, Slaug B, Brandt Å, Pikkarainen A, Hansen A-G, Pétersdóttir E, Iwarsson S (2010) The Nordic housing enabler: inter-rater reliability in cross-Nordic occupational therapy practice. Scand J Occup Ther 17:1–9
Heyl V, Wahl H-W, Mollenkopf H (2005) Visions, out of home activities and emotional well-being in old age: do macro-contexts make a difference? Int Congr Ser 1282:147–151
Imrie R (2006) Accessible housing, quality, disability and design. Routledge, London
Iwarsson S, Slaug B (2001) The Housing Enabler: an instrument for assessing and analysing accessibility problems in housing. Veten and Skapen HB and Slaug Data Management, Nävlinge and Staffanstorp
Iwarsson S, Ståhl A (2003) Accessibility, usability, and universal design: positioning and definition of concepts describing person–environment relationships. Disabil Rehabil 25:57–66
Iwarsson S, Sixsmith J, Oswald F, Wahl H-W, Nygren C, Sixsmith A, Széman Z, Tomsone S (2004) The ENABLE-AGE project: multi-dimensional methodology for European housing research. In: Wilkinson N, Hurol Y (eds) Housing research methodologies. Urban International, Mersin
Iwarsson S, Nygren C, Slaug B (2005) Cross national and multi-professional inter-rater reliability of the Housing Enabler. Scand J Occup Ther 12:29–39
Kaye HS, Kang T, LaPlante MP (2000) Mobility devices use in the United States. Disability Statistics Report 14. Available from: Disability Statistics Center, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 340, San Francisco, CA 94118
Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2004) Combining utility usability and accessibility methods for Universal Access. ACM CHI Workshop on Universal Design, Seattle, USA
Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC (2003) Medical Statistics Second edition. Blackwell Science Ltd, USA
Kozey JW, Das B (2004) Determination of the normal and maximum reach measures of adult wheelchair users. Int J Ind Ergon 33:205–213
Lawton MP, Nahemow L (1973) Ecology and the aging process. In: Eisdorfer C, Lawton MP (eds) The psychology of adult development and aging. American psychological association (APA), Washington, DC
Letts L, Rigby P, Stewart D (2003) Using Environments to Enable Occupational Performance. Slack Incorporated, Thorofare, NJ
Nickpour F, Dong H (2009) Anthropometrics without numbers! An investigation of designers’ use and preference of people data. Include 2009, Royal College of Art, April 8–10, 2009, London. Available from http://www.hhc.rca.ac.uk/2084/all/1/procedings.aspx
Nygren C, Oswald F, Iwarsson S, Fänge A, Sixsmith J, Schilling O, Sixsmith A, Széman Z, Tomsone S, Wahl HW (2007) Relationships between objective and perceived housing in very old age. Gerontologist 47:85–95
Oswald F, Wahl H-W, Schilling O, Nygren C, Fänge A, Sixsmith A et al (2007) Relationships between housing and healthy ageing in very old age. Gerontologist 47:96–107
Paquet V, Feathers D (2004) An anthropometric study of manual and powered wheelchair users. Int J Ind Ergon 33:191–204
Persson J, Sahlin N-E (2008) Risk and Risici. Bokförlaget Nya Doxa, Nora, Sweden
Ringaert L, Rapson D, Qui J, Cooper J, Schwedyk E (2001) Determination of new dimensions for universal design codes and standards with consideration of powered wheelchair and scooter users. Universal Design Institute, Faculty of Architecture, University of Manitoba. Website: http://www.arch.umanitoba.ca/UofM/CIBFD
Slaug B, Schilling O, Iwarsson S, Carlsson G (2010) Defining profiles of functional limitations in groups of older persons: how and why? J Aging Health. doi:10.1177/0898264310390681
Statistics Sweden (2005) Undersökningarna av levnadsförhållanden (ULF)
Steinfeld E, Paquet V, Feathers D (2004) Space requirements for wheeled mobility devices. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 48th annual meeting
Steinfeld E, Maisel J, Feathers D, D’Souza C (2010) Anthropometry and standards for wheeled mobility: an international comparison. Assist Technol 22:51–67
Whiteford G (2000) Occupational deprivation: global challenge in the new millennium. Br J Occup Ther 63:200–204
Wilcock A (2006) An Occupational Perspective on Health. Second edition. Slack Incorporated, Thorofare, NJ
Acknowledgments
This study was accomplished within the context of the Centre for Ageing and Supportive Environments (CASE), at Lund University, funded by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research. The study was also supported by funding from the Ribbing Foundation, Lund, Sweden, the Danish Association of Occupational Therapy and the University College Northern Jutland, Aalborg Denmark. The authors would like to thank all study participants, consortium and national team members for their contribution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper belongs to the special issue “Housing for health promotion”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Helle, T., Brandt, A., Slaug, B. et al. Lack of research-based standards for accessible housing: problematization and exemplification of consequences. Int J Public Health 56, 635–644 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-011-0290-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-011-0290-4