Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 525–533 | Cite as

Self-reported health in urban–rural continuum: a grid-based analysis of Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966

  • Tiina LankilaEmail author
  • Simo Näyhä
  • Arja Rautio
  • Tanja Nordström
  • Markku Koiranen
  • Anja Taanila
  • Jarmo Rusanen
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the association of self-reported health with residential area type defined by the population density in individual’s local environment using a population-based cohort in Finland.

Methods

Young adults of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (4,201 women and 3,835 men), surveyed by a postal questionnaire in 1997, were linked to population density of their resident grid (1 km2) depicting different types of residential areas. Self-reported health was regressed on residential area type using ordinal logistic analysis, adjusting for psychosocial well-being, social relationships, health behaviour, education and residence time.

Results

Cumulative odds ratios (COR) for poor health were lowest in high-rise centres, highest in scattered settlement areas and second highest in transitional zones. Adjustments (especially for education and time of residence) reduced the CORs to insignificance except the persistently high COR for women in scattered settlement areas.

Conclusion

Poor self-reported health is associated with individual’s residential area type, with the lowest occurrence in high-rise centres and higher elsewhere. The difference is likely explained, at least partly, by a complex of psychosocial factors, possibly different for women and men.

Keywords

Medical geography Subjective health Ordinal regression Urban–rural Gender differences GIS 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Blane D (2003) Commentary: explanations of the differences in mortality risk between different educational groups. Int J Epidemiol 32(3):355–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cummins S, Stafford M, Macintyre S, Marmot M, Ellaway A (2005) Neighbourhood environment and its association with self rated health: evidence from Scotland and England. J Epidemiol Community Health 59:207–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cummins S, Curtis S, Diez-Roux AV, Macintyre S (2007) Understanding and representing ‘place’ in health research: a relational approach. Soc Sci Med 65:1825–1838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Curtis S, Rees Jones I (1998) Is there a place for geography in the analysis of health inequality? Sociol Health Illn 20(5):645–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenluth EH, Covi L (1974) The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci 19(1):1–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eberhardt MS, Pamuk ER (2004) The importance of place of residence: Examining health in rural and nonrural areas. Am J Public Health 94(10):1682–1686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ek E, Koiranen M, Järvelin M-R, Raatikka V-P, Taanila A (2008) Psychosocial factors as mediators between migration and subjective well-being among young Finnish adults. Soc Sci Med 66:1545–1556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gløersen E, Dubois A, Copus A, Schürmann C (2005) Northern peripheral, sparsely populated regions in the European Union. Nordregio Report 4. Nordregio, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  9. Heinrich LM, Gullone E (2006) The clinical significance of loneliness: a literature review. Clin Psychol Rev 26:695–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Idler EL, Benyamini Y (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38:21–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Isohanni I (2000) Education and mental disorders. A 31-year follow-up in the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort. Acta Univ Ouluensis Medica D 617Google Scholar
  12. Kaplan G, Baron-Epel O (2003) What lies behind the subjective evaluation of health status? Soc Sci Med 56:1669–1676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaplan GA, Goldberg D, Everson S, Cohen R, Salonen R, Tuomilehto J, Salonen J (1996) Perceived health status and morbidity and mortality: evidence from the Kuopio ischaemic hearth disease risk factor study. Int J Epidemiol 25(2):259–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karvonen S, Kauppinen TM (2008) Hyvinvoinnin vajeet maalla, kaupungeissa ja kaupunkikeskuksissa. [Deficits of well-being in rural areas, in urban areas and in city centres]. In: Moisio P, Karvonen S, Simpura J, Heikkilä M (eds) Suom hyvinvointi 2008. Stakes, pp 276–291Google Scholar
  15. Karvonen S, Rintala T (2006) Asuinympäristö hyvinvoinnin määrittäjänä. [Residential area as determinant of well-being]. In: Kautto M (ed) Suom hyvinvointi 2006. Stakes, pp 285–305Google Scholar
  16. Kavanagh AM, Bentley R, Turrell G, Broom DH, Subramanian SV (2006) Does gender modify associations between self rated health and the social and economic characteristics of local environments? J Epidemiol Community Health 60:490–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Macintyre S, Maciver S, Sooman A (1993) Area, class and health: should we be focusing on places or people? J Soc Policy 22(2):213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S (2002) Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Soc Sci Med 55:125–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manderbacka K, Lundberg O, Martikainen P (1999) Do risk factors and health behaviours contribute to self- ratings of health? Soc Sci Med 48:1713–1720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manor O, Matthews S, Power C (2001) Self-rated health and limiting longstanding illness: inter- relationships with morbidity in early adulthood. Int J Epidemiol 30:600–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miilunpalo S, Vuori I, Oja P, Pasanen M, Urponen H (1997) Self-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. J Clin Epidemiol 50(5):517–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Molarius A, Berglund K, Eriksson C, Lambe M, Nordström E, Eriksson HG, Feldman I (2006) Socioeconomic conditions, lifestyle factors, and self-rated health among men and women in Sweden. Eur J Public Health 17(2):125–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Muilu T, Rusanen J (2003) Rural young people in regional development–the case of Finland in 1970–2000. J Rural Stud 19:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Näyhä S, Hassi J (1999) Surveying mortality in Northern Finland: two towns with contrasting trends. Int J Circumpolar Health 58(3):198–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Näyhä S, Järvelin R (1998) Health trends in Northern Finland. Int J Circumpolar Health 57(2–3):94–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. NFBC website (2010) Available at: http://kelo.oulu.fi/NFBC/index.html Accessed 9. December 2010
  27. Pickett KE, Pearl M (2001) Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:111–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rantakallio P (1988) The longitudinal study of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort of 1966. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2:59–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Riva M, Curtis S, Gauvin S, Fagg J (2009) Unravelling the extent of inequalities in health across urban and rural areas: evidence from a national sample in England. Soc Sci Med 68:654–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ross CE, Wu C-L (1995) The links between education and health. Am Sociol Rev 60(5):719–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rusanen J, Muilu T, Colpaert A, Naukkarinen A (2001) Finnish socio-economic grid data, GIS and the hidden geography of unemployment. J Econ Soc Geogr 92(2):139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rusanen J, Muilu T, Colpaert A, Naukkarinen A (2003) Georeferenced data as a tool for monitoring the concentration of population in Finland in 1970–1998. Fennia 181(2):129–144Google Scholar
  33. Rytkönen M, Rusanen J, Näyhä S (2001) Small-area variation in mortality in the city of Oulu, Finland, during the period 1978–1995. Health Place 7:75–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shooshtari S, Menec V, Tate R (2007) Comparing predictors of positive and negative self-rated health between younger (25–54) and older (55+) Canadian adults: a longitudinal study of well-being. Res Aging 29(6):512–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simon JG, De Boer LB, Joung IMA, Bosma H, Mackenbach JP (2005) How is your health in general? A qualitative study on self-assessed health. Eur J Public Health 15(2):200–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith KB, Humphreys JS, Wilson MGA (2008) Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: how does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research? Aust J Rural Health 16:56–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sorri M, Järvelin M-R (1998) Well-being, health. Background to the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort research. Int J Circumpolar Health 57(2–3):82–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Stafford M, Cummins S, Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Marmot M (2005) Gender differences in the associations between health and neighbourhood environment. Soc Sci Med 60:1681–1692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Statistics Finland (2007) Available at: http://www.stat.fi/tup/ruututietokanta/index_en.html Accessed 9. December 2010
  40. Tammelin T, Näyhä S, Hills AP, Järvelin M-R (2003) Adolescent participation in sports and adult physical activity. Am J Prev Med 24(1):22–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiina Lankila
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Simo Näyhä
    • 2
    • 3
  • Arja Rautio
    • 4
  • Tanja Nordström
    • 2
  • Markku Koiranen
    • 2
  • Anja Taanila
    • 2
    • 5
  • Jarmo Rusanen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Institute of Health SciencesUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  3. 3.Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthOuluFinland
  4. 4.Centre for Arctic Medicine, Thule InstituteUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  5. 5.Unit of General PracticeOulu University HospitalOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations