Alpine Botany

, Volume 128, Issue 2, pp 149–167 | Cite as

Genetic differentiation, phenotypic plasticity and adaptation in a hybridizing pair of a more common and a less common Carex species

  • Lisanna Schmidt
  • Bernhard Schmid
  • Tatjana Oja
  • Markus Fischer
Original Article


Phenotypic variation may be genetically determined or reflect phenotypic plasticity. More common plants are expected to be less differentiated between and within regions and more adapted than less common ones. However, such differences might not develop in hybridizing species which cannot evolve completely independently. We collected 311 genets of Carex flava, 215 of C. viridula and 46 of their hybrid C. × subviridula from 42 natural populations in cold temperate Estonia, mild temperate Lowland Switzerland and alpine Highland Switzerland. Three plantlets from each genet were planted to three experimental gardens, one in each region. We measured survival, growth, reproduction and morphological traits. The experimental transplants showed strong plasticity and grew smallest in the alpine garden. The less common C. viridula was slightly more differentiated between regions of origin than the more common C. flava and the hybrid. However, this depended on the experimental garden. Significant origin-by-garden-by-taxon and taxon-by-garden interactions suggest differential adaptation among populations and taxa. Regional differed from non-regional plants in several traits indicating both adaptations and, especially for C. viridula, maladaptations to the home regions. For C. flava, plant seed production was higher when mean annual temperature and precipitation were more similar between population of origin and garden, suggesting local adaptation to climate. Hybrids were intermediate between parental taxa or more similar to one of them, which was retained across gardens. We conclude that plasticity, genetic variation and genotype–environment interactions all contributed to regional differentiation of the closely related species. Hybridization did not completely align evolutionary patterns, and the less common species showed slightly more genetic differentiation between populations and more maladapted traits than the more common one.


Carex flava group Genotype-by-environment interaction Performance Regional adaptation Transplant experiment Variability 



We are thankful to the team of the Alpine Botanical Garden Schynige Platte, assistants at the University of Zurich and laboratory technicians at the University of Tartu for looking after and taking care of plants in the experimental gardens. We are also grateful to numerous people from the University of Bern who helped in measuring the plants during the experiment.

Author contributions

LS and MF conceived the paper with BS and TO. LS performed the analyses and wrote the manuscript under the guidance of MF and with critical reviews and contributions from all coauthors.


The work was supported by the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research, institutional research funding (IUT 20-28, 20-29) and the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (Centre of Excellence EcolChange).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

35_2018_211_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (433 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 432 KB)
35_2018_211_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (471 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 470 KB)
35_2018_211_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (288 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 288 KB)
35_2018_211_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (535 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 534 KB)
35_2018_211_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (313 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 312 KB)
35_2018_211_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (368 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (PDF 368 KB)
35_2018_211_MOESM7_ESM.pdf (494 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (PDF 494 KB)
35_2018_211_MOESM8_ESM.pdf (268 kb)
Supplementary material 8 (PDF 267 KB)


  1. Abbott RJ (2017) Plant speciation across environmental gradients and the occurrence and nature of hybrid zones. J Syst Evol 55:238–258. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JT, Perera N, Chowdhury B, Mitchell-Olds T (2015) Microgeographic patterns of genetic divergence and adaptation across environmental gradients in Boechera stricta (Brassicaceae). Am Nat 186:S60–S73. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker U, Colling G, Dostal P, Jakobsson A, Matthies D (2006) Local adaptation in the monocarpic perennial Carlina vulgaris at different spatial scales across Europe. Oecologia 150:506–518. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bischoff A, Müller-Schärer H (2010) Testing population differentiation in plant species—how important are environmental maternal effects. Oikos 119:445–454. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackstock N, Ashton PA (2010) Genetic markers and morphometric analysis reveal past hybridization and introgression in putative Carex flava L. s. str. (Cyperaceae) hybrid populations. Plant Syst Evol 287:37–47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanquart F, Gandon S, Nuismer SL (2012) The effects of migration and drift on local adaptation to a heterogeneous environment. J Evol Biol 25:1351–1363. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brennan AC, Hiscock SJ, Abbott RJ (2016) Genomic architecture of phenotypic divergence between two hybridizing plant species along an elevational gradient. AoB Plants 8:plw022. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bucharova A, Michalski S, Hermann J-M, Heveling K, Durka W, Hölzel N, Kollmann J, Bossdorf O (2016) Genetic differentiation and regional adaptation among seed origins used for grassland restoration: lessons from a multispecies transplant experiment. J Appl Ecol 54:127–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Byars SG, Papst W, Hoffmann AA (2007) Local adaptation and cogradient selection in the alpine plant, Poa hiemata, along a narrow altitudinal gradient. Evolution 61:2925–2941. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell DR, Waser NM (2001) Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution 55:669–676.;2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Clevering OA, Brix H, Lukavská J (2001) Geographic variation in growth responses in Phragmites australis. Aquat Bot 69:89–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crins WJ, Ball PW (1989) Taxonomy of the Carex flava complex (Cyperaceae) in North America and northern Eurasia. II. Taxonomic treatment. Can J Bot 67:1048–1065. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies EW (1953) Notes on Carex flava and its allies. III. The taxonomy and morphology of the British representatives. Watsonia 3:74–79Google Scholar
  15. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emms SK, Arnold ML (1997) The effect of habitat on parental and hybrid fitness: transplant experiments with Louisiana irises. Evolution 51:1112–1119. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Estonian Weather Service (2015) The Estonian weather service. Accessed 3 Apr 2018
  18. Fox J (2003) Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. J Stat Softw 8:1–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman DC, Miglia KJ, McArthur ED, Graham JH, Wang H (1999) Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). X. Performance in reciprocal transplant gardens. In: USDA forest service proceedings RMRS-P-11, pp 15–24Google Scholar
  20. Galloway LF, Fenster CB (2000) Population differentiation in an annual legume: local adaptation. Evolution 54:1173–1181.;2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gonzalo-Turpin H, Hazard L (2009) Local adaptation occurs along altitudinal gradient despite the existence of gene flow in the alpine plant species Festuca eskia. J Ecol 97:742–751. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Govindaraju DR (1988) Relationship between dispersal ability and levels of gene flow in plants. Oikos. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gugger S, Kesselring H, Stöcklin J, Hamann E (2015) Lower plasticity exhibited by high-versus mid-elevation species in their phenological responses to manipulated temperature and drought. Ann Bot 116:953–962. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamann E, Scheepens JF, Kesselring H, Armbruster GFJ, Stöcklin J (2017) High intraspecific phenotypic variation, but little evidence for local adaptation in Geum reptans populations in the Central Swiss Alps. Alp Bot 127:121–132. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hedrén M (2002) Patterns of allozyme and morphological differentiation in the Carex flava complex (Cyperaceae) in Fennoscandia. Nord J Bot 22:257–301. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hereford J (2009) A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am Nat 173:579–588. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Janyszek M, Jagodziński AM, Janyszek S, Wrońska-Pilarek D (2008) Morphological variability of Carex spicata Huds. utricles among plant communities. Flora 203:386–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johansen-Morris AD, Latta RG (2006) Fitness consequences of hybridization between ecotypes of Avena barbata: hybrid breakdown, hybrid vigor, and transgressive segregation. Evolution 60:1585–1595. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Joshi J, Schmid B, Caldeira MC, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Good J, Harris R, Hector A, Huss-Danell K, Jumpponen A, Minns A (2001) Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecol Lett 4:536–544. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaplan Z (2002) Phenotypic plasticity in Potamogeton (Potamogetonaceae). Folia Geobot 37:141–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Körner C (2003) Alpine plant life: functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems; with 47 tables. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Körner C (2016) Plant adaptation to cold climates. F1000Research. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Koutecký P (2015) MorphoTools: a set of R functions for morphometric analysis. Plant Syst Evol 301:1115–1121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuchel SD, Bruederle LP (2000) Allozyme data support a Eurasian origin for Carex viridula subsp. viridula var. viridula (Cyperaceae). Madroño 47:147–158Google Scholar
  37. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2016) lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw 82:1–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leimu R, Fischer M (2008) A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PloS One 3:e4010. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Maad J, Armbruster WS, Fenster CB (2013) Floral size variation in Campanula rotundifolia (Campanulaceae) along altitudinal gradients: patterns and possible selective mechanisms. Nord J Bot 31:361–371. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meteoswiss (2015) Federal office of meteorology and climatology. Accessed 3 Apr 2018
  41. Miglia KJ, McArthur ED, Moore WS, Wang H, Graham JH, Freeman D (2005) Nine-year reciprocal transplant experiment in the gardens of the basin and mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae) hybrid zone of Salt Creek Canyon: the importance of multiple-year tracking of fitness. Biol J Linn Soc 86:213–225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Molina-Montenegro MA, Naya DE (2012) Latitudinal patterns in phenotypic plasticity and fitness-related traits: assessing the climatic variability hypothesis (CVH) with an invasive plant species. PloS One 7:1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pykälä J, Toivonen H (1994) Taxonomy of the Carex flava complex (Cyperaceae) in Finland. Nord J Bot 14:173–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  45. Rice KJ, Knapp EE (2008) Effects of competition and life history stage on the expression of local adaptation in two native bunchgrasses. Restor Ecol 16:12–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rieseberg LH, Burke JM (2001) The biological reality of species: gene flow, selection, and collective evolution. Taxon. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rieseberg LH, Willis JH (2007) Plant speciation. Science 317:910–914. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Santamaría L, Figuerola J, Pilon JJ, Mjelde M, Green AJ, Boer T, King RA, Gornall RJ (2003) Plant performance across latitude: the role of plasticity and local adaptation in an aquatic plant. Ecology 84:2454–2461. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scheepens JF, Stöcklin J (2013) Flowering phenology and reproductive fitness along a mountain slope: maladaptive responses to transplantation to a warmer climate in Campanula thyrsoides. Oecologia 171:679–691. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:667–693. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmid B (1981) Die Verbreitung der Artengruppe Carex flava L. s.l. in der Schweiz. Bot Helv 91:3–8Google Scholar
  52. Schmid B (1982) Karyology and hydridization in the Carex flava complex in Switzerland. Feddes Repert 93:23–59. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schmid B (1984) Life histories in clonal plants of the Carex flava group. J Ecol 72:93–114. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schmid B (1986) Patterns of variation and population structure in the Carex flava group. Symb Bot Upsal 27:113–126Google Scholar
  55. Schmid B (1992) Phenotypic variation in plants. Evol Trends Plants 6:45–60Google Scholar
  56. Schmidt L, Fischer M, Schmid B, Oja T (2017) Despite admixing two closely related Carex species differ in their regional morphological differentiation. Plant Syst Evol 7:901–914. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmidt L, Fischer M, Oja T (2018) Two closely related species differ in their regional genetic differentiation despite admixing. AoB Plants 10:1–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seguí J, Lázaro A, Traveset A, Salgado-Luarte C, Gianoli E (2018) Phenotypic and reproductive responses of an Andean violet to environmental variation across an elevational gradient. Alp Bot 128:59–69. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Šťastná P, Klimešová J, Doležal J (2012) Altitudinal changes in the growth and allometry of Rumex alpinus. Alp Bot 122:35–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stöcklin J, Kuss P, Pluess AR (2009) Genetic diversity, phenotypic variation and local adaptation in the alpine landscape: case studies with alpine plant species. Bot Helv 119:125–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Toom M, Liira J, Kull T (2016) Tarnad—the genus Carex in Estonia, (in Estonian), 1st edn. University of Tartu, TartuGoogle Scholar
  62. Trunschke J, Stöcklin J (2017) Plasticity of flower longevity in alpine plants is increased in populations from high elevation compared to low elevation populations. Alp Bot 127:41–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vonk DH (1979) Biosystematic studies of the Carex flava complex I. Flowering. Plant Biol 28:1–20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang H, McArthur ED, Sanderson SC, Graham JH, Freeman DC (1997) Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). IV. Reciprocal transplant experiments. Evolution 51:95–102. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Więcław H (2014) Carex flava agg. (section Ceratocystis, Cyperaceae) in Poland: taxonomy, morphological variation, and soil conditions. Biodivers Res Conserv 33:3–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Botanical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth SciencesUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia
  2. 2.Institute of Plant SciencesUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of GeographyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Botanical GardenUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  5. 5.Oeschger Centre for Climate Change ResearchUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations