Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification of Hammerstein–Wiener Systems with State-Space Subsystems Based on the Improved PSO and GSA Algorithm

  • Published:
Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the parameter estimation of Hammerstein–Wiener systems whose linear subsystems are observable state-space models. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) and gravitational search (GSA) algorithms are combined to derive a novel method for identifying the discussed systems. To improve the optimization ability, some improvements are employed, including adding the oscillating exponential decay inertia weight and fuzzy membership in PSO (OFPSO) and introducing the chaotic optimization mechanism to GSA (CGSA). Thus, the combination of OFPSO and CGSA (OFPSO-CGSA) method is proposed. Its principle is to utilize coordinated behaviors of the speed in the OFPSO algorithm and the acceleration in the CGSA algorithm to update the particle position. Moreover, the convergence analysis proves that the OFPSO-CGSA algorithm converges to the global solution with probability one. Two simulations of the Hammerstein–Wiener nonlinear systems with two-dimensional and three-dimensional linear state space subsystems verify that the algorithms are effective, and OFPSO-CGSA has the best performance considering the convergence speed and identification accuracy in the algorithm comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

This manuscript has no associated data.

References

  1. C.J.Z. Aguilar, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, V.M. Alvarado-Martínez, H.M. Romero-Ugalde, Fractional order neural networks for system identification. Chaos Solitons Fractals 130, 109444 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Atitallah, S. Bedoui, K. Abderrahim, Joint parameter and time-delay identification algorithm and its convergence analysis for Wiener time-delay systems. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 39, 199–222 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bai, Z. Mao, T. Pu, Recursive identification for multi-input–multi-output Hammerstein–Wiener system. Int. J. Control 92(6), 1457–1469 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Brouri, F.Z. Chaoui, F. Giri, Identification of Hammerstein–Wiener models with hysteresis front nonlinearities. Int. J. Control 95(12), 3353–3367 (2022)

  5. A. Brouri, F. Giri, F. Ikhouane, F.Z. Chaoui, O. Amdouri, Identification of Hammerstein–Wiener systems with backlash input nonlinearity bordered by straight lines, in 19th IFAC World Congress (vol. 47, No. 3, 2014) August 24–29, pp. 475–480

  6. A. Brouri, L. Kadi, S. Slassi, Frequency identification of Hammerstein–Wiener systems with backlash input nonlinearity. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 15, 2222–2232 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. Cerone, V. Razza, D. Regruto, One-shot set-membership identification of generalized Hammerstein–Wiener systems. Automatica 118, 109028 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. F. Ding, H. Chen, L. Xu, J. Dai, Q. Li, T. Hayat, A hierarchical least squares identification algorithm for Hammerstein nonlinear systems using the key term separation. J. Franklin Inst. 355(8), 3737–3752 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. F. Ding, X. Liu, M. Liu, The recursive least squares identification algorithm for a class of wiener nonlinear systems. J. Franklin Inst. 353(7), 1518–1526 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Ding, X. Wang, Q. Chen, Y. Xiao, Recursive least squares parameter estimation for a class of output nonlinear systems based on the model decomposition. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 35(9), 3323–3338 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Ding, X. Zhang, L. Xu, The innovation algorithms for multivariable state-space models. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 33(11), 1601–1618 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M.M. Garcia, J.Y.R. Morales, G.O. Torres, S.A.R. Paredes, S.V. Reyes, F.D.J.S. Vázquez, A.F.P. Vidal, J.S.V. Martínez, R.P. Zúñiga, E.M.R. Vargas, Simulation and state feedback control of a pressure swing adsorption process to produce hydrogen. Mathematics 10(10), 1762 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. García-Ródenas, L.J. Linares, J.A. López-Gómez, A memetic chaotic gravitational search algorithm for unconstrained global optimization problems. Appl. Soft Comput. 79, 14–29 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Giladi, A. Sintov, Manifold learning for efficient gravitational search algorithm. Inf. Sci. 517, 18–36 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Giri, A. Brouri, O. Amdouri, F.Z. Chaoui, Frequency identification of Hammerstein–Wiener systems with piecewise affine input nonlinearity, in 19th IFAC World Congress (vol. 47, No. 3, 2014) August 24–29, pp. 10030–10035

  16. A. Gopal, M.M. Sultani, J.C. Bansal, On stability analysis of particle swarm optimization algorithm. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 45, 2385–2394 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Gu, J. Liu, X. Li, Y. Chou, Y. Ji, State space model identification of multirate processes with time-delay using the expectation maximization. J. Franklin Inst. 356(3), 1623–1639 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Guha, M. Ghosh, A. Chakrabarti, R. Sarkar, S. Mirjalili, Introducing clustering based population in binary gravitational search algorithm for feature selection. Appl. Soft Comput. 93, 106341 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.A. Islam, Y. Gajpal, T.Y. ElMekkawy, Hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving the clustered vehicle routing problem. Appl. Soft Comput. 110, 107655 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Jiang, Y. Wang, Z. Ji, Convergence analysis and performance of an improved gravitational search algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 24, 363–384 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Jiang, X. Yang, X. Meng, K. Li, Enhance chaotic gravitational search algorithm (CGSA) by balance adjustment mechanism and sine randomness function for continuous optimization problems. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 537, 122621 (2020)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. F. Li, L. Jia, Parameter estimation of Hammerstein–Wiener nonlinear system with noise using special test signals. Neurocomputing 344, 37–48 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Li, W. Zheng, J. Gu, L. Hua, A recursive identification algorithm for Wiener nonlinear systems with linear state-space subsystem. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 37(6), 2374–2393 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Li, T. Zong, J. Gu, L. Hua, Parameter estimation of Wiener systems based on the particle swarm iteration and gradient search principle. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 39, 3470–3495 (2020)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Li, T. Zong, G. Lu, Parameter identification of Hammerstein–Wiener nonlinear systems with unknown time delay based on the linear variable weight particle swarm optimization. ISA Trans. 120, 89–98 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Q. Liu, Y. Xiao, F. Ding, T. Hayat, Decomposition-based over-parameterization forgetting factor stochastic gradient algorithm for Hammerstein–Wiener nonlinear systems with non-uniform sampling. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 31(12), 6007–6024 (2021)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Mansouri, H. Tolouei, M.A. Shoorehdeli, Identification of Hammerstein–Wiener ARMAX systems using Extended Kalman Filter, in Proceedings of the 2011 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, CCDC 2011 (2011), pp. 1110–1114

  28. M. Moodi, M. Ghazvini, H. Moodi, A hybrid intelligent approach to detect android botnet using smart self-adaptive learning-based PSO-SVM. Knowl. Based Syst. 222, 106988 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.Y.R. Morales, G.L. López, V.M.A. Martínez, F.D.J.S. Vázquez, J.A.B. Mendoza, M.M. García, Parametric study and control of a pressure swing adsorption process to separate the water–ethanol mixture under disturbances. Sep. Purif. Technol. 236, 116214 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.Y.R. Morales, J.A.B. Mendoza, G.O. Torres, F.D.J.S. Vázquez, A.C. Rojas, A.F.P. Vidal, Fault-tolerant control implemented to Hammerstein–Wiener model: application to bio-ethanol dehydration. Fuel 308, 121836 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  31. B. Pedretscher, B. Kaltenbacher, O. Pfeiler, Parameter identification and uncertainty quantification in stochastic state space models and its application to texture analysis. Appl. Numer. Math. 146, 38–54 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. D. Pelusi, R. Mascella, L. Tallini, J. Nayak, B. Naik, Y. Deng, Improving exploration and exploitation via a hyperbolic gravitational search algorithm. Knowl. Based Syst. 193, 105404 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  33. E.M. Rentería-Vargas, C.J.Z. Aguilar, J.Y.R. Morales, F.D.J.S. Vázquez, M. De-La-Torre, J.A. Cervantes, E.S. Bustos, M.C. Rodríguez, Neural network-based identification of a PSA process for production and purification of bioethanol. IEEE Access 10, 27771–27782 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. Ritzberger, J. Höflinger, Z.P. Du, C. Hametner, S. Jakubek, Data-driven parameterization of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell models via simultaneous local linear structured state space identification. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46(21), 11878–11893 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. Rodrigues, Y. Molina, C. Silva, Z. Ñaupari, Simultaneous tuning of the AVR and PSS parameters using particle swarm optimization with oscillating exponential decay. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 133, 107215 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. C. Steenkamp, A.P. Engelbrecht, A scalability study of the multi-guide particle swarm optimization algorithm to many-objectives. Swarm Evolut. Comput. 66, 100943 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  37. F. Su, C.R. Duan, R.P. Wang, Analysis and improvement of GSA’s optimization process. Appl. Soft Comput. 107, 107367 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. Wills, B. Ninness, Generalised Hammerstein–Wiener system estimation and a benchmark application. Control Eng. Pract. 20(11), 1097–1108 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Wills, T.B. Schön, L. Ljung, B. Ninness, Identification of Hammerstein–Wiener models. Automatica 49(1), 70–81 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. C. Yang, J. Zhang, M. Tong, A Hybrid quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving inverse scattering problems. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 69(9), 5861–5869 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  41. C. Yu, J. Chen, S. Li, M. Verhaegen, Identification of affinely parameterized state-space models with unknown inputs. Automatica 122, 109271 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. F. Yu, Z.Z. Mao, P. Yuan, D.K. He, M.X. Jia, Recursive parameter estimation for Hammerstein–Wiener systems using modified EKF algorithm. ISA Trans. 70, 104–115 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. F. Zhao, X. Zhou, X. Xie, K. Wang, Design of gradient magnetic field coil based on an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for magnetocardiography systems. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 70, 9520428 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  44. T. Zong, J. Li, G. Lu, Auxiliary model-based multi-innovation PSO identification for Wiener-Hammerstein systems with scarce measurements. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 106, 104470 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  45. L.R. Zou, Design of reactive power optimization control for electromechanical system based on fuzzy particle swarm optimization algorithm. Microprocess. Microsyst. 82, 103865 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  46. C.J. Zúñiga-Aguilar, J.F. Gómez-Aguilar, H.M. Romero-Ugalde, H. Jahanshahi, F.E. Alsaadi, Fractal-fractional neuro-adaptive method for system identification. Eng. Comput. 38, 3085–3108 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61973176, 62073180), the Natural Science Research Program of Jiangsu Colleges and Universities (20KJA470002), the Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of China, and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX21_3083).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical Engineering, Nantong University, Seyuan Road, Nantong, 226019, Jiangsu, China

    Tiancheng Zong, Junhong Li & Guoping Lu

  2. School of Information Science and Technology, Nantong University, Seyuan Road, Nantong, 226019, Jiangsu, China

    Tiancheng Zong

Authors
  1. Tiancheng Zong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junhong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guoping Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Junhong Li or Guoping Lu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zong, T., Li, J. & Lu, G. Identification of Hammerstein–Wiener Systems with State-Space Subsystems Based on the Improved PSO and GSA Algorithm. Circuits Syst Signal Process 42, 2755–2781 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-022-02268-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-022-02268-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation