Advertisement

Selecta Mathematica

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 2063–2092 | Cite as

Filtrations on graph complexes and the Grothendieck–Teichmüller Lie algebra in depth two

  • Matteo Felder
Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

We establish an isomorphism between the Grothendieck–Teichmüller Lie algebra \(\mathfrak {grt}_1\) in depth two modulo higher depth and the cohomology of the two-loop part of the graph complex of internally connected graphs \(\mathsf {ICG}(1)\). In particular, we recover all linear relations satisfied by the brackets of the conjectural generators \(\sigma _{2k+1}\) modulo depth three by considering relations among two-loop graphs. The Grothendieck–Teichmüller Lie algebra is related to the zeroth cohomology of Kontsevich’s graph complex \(\mathsf {GC}_2\) via Willwacher’s isomorphism. We define a descending filtration on \(H^0(\mathsf {GC}_2)\) and show that the degree two components of the corresponding associated graded vector spaces are isomorphic under Willwacher’s map.

Keywords

Grothendieck–Teichmüller Lie algebra Graph complexes 

Mathematics Subject Classification

17B65 81R10 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alekseev, A., Torossian, C.: The Kashiwara–Vergne conjecture and Drinfeld’s associators. Ann. Math. 172(2), 415–463 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arone, G., Turchin, V.: Graph-complexes computing the rational homotopy of high dimensional analogues of spaces of long knots. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 65(1), 1–62 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, F.: Mixed tate motives over \({\mathbb{Z}}\). Ann. Math. 175(2), 949–976 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conant, J., Gerlits, F., Vogtmann, K.: Cut vertices in commutative graphs. Q. J. Math. 56(3), 321–336 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conant, J., Costello, J., Turchin, V., Weed, P.: Two-loop part of the rational homotopy of spaces of long embeddings. J. Knot Theory Ramif. 23(4), 1450018 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drinfeld, V.G.: On quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebras and on agroup that is closely connected with \(({\bar{Q}}/\text{ Q })\). Leningr. Math. J. 2(4), 829–860 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Felder, M.: Internally connected graphs and the Kashiwara–Vergne Lie algebra. Lett. Math. Phys. 108(6), 1407–1441 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goncharov, A.: The dihedral Lie algebras and Galois symmetries of \(\pi _1^{(l)}({\mathbb{P}}^1-(\{0,\infty \}\cup \mu _N))\). Duke Math. J. 110(3), 397–487 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ihara, Y.: Some arithmetic aspects of Galois actions in the pro-\(p\) fundamental group of \({\mathbb{P}}^1-\{0,1,\infty \}\). In: Arithmetic fundamental groups and noncommutative algebra (Berkeley, CA, 1999), volume 70 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., pages 247–273. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kontsevich, M.: Formal (non)commutative symplectic geometry. The Gel\(\prime \)fand Mathematical Seminars. 1990–1992, pp. 173–187. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kontsevich M.: Feynman diagrams and low-dimensional topology. In: First European Congress of Mathematics, Vol. II (Paris, 1992), volume 120 of Progr. Math., pages 97–121. Birkhäuser, Basel (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kontsevich, M.: Formality conjecture. In: Deformation theory and symplectic geometry (Ascona, 1996), volume 20 of Math. Phys. Stud., pages 139–156. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kontsevich, M.: Operads and motives in deformation quantization. Lett. Math. Phys. 48(1), 35–72 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lambrechts, P., Volić, I.: Formality of the little \(N\)-disks operad. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 230(1079), viii+116 (2014)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schneps, L.: On the Poisson bracket on the free Lie algebra in two generators. J. Lie Theory 16(1), 19–37 (2006)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ŝevera, P., Willwacher, T.: Equivalence of formalities of the little discs operad. Duke Math. J. 160(1), 175–206 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Willwacher, T.: M. Kontsevich’s graph complex and the Grothendieck–Teichmüller Lie algebra. Invent. Math. 200(3), 671–760 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of GenevaGeneva 4Switzerland

Personalised recommendations