Abstract
The activity level-predation risk paradigm of community assembly is based on observable trade-offs between activity level and predation risk. Many species that live in ephemeral habitats are relatively more active, grow faster, and metamorphose sooner than those in more permanent habitats, thus enabling them to survive by escaping drying ponds. Species with high activity levels are shown to be superior competitors in temporary ponds, but are at greater risk of predation by visually cued predators. We take a comprehensive approach to testing if the activity-predation paradigm drives community assembly of a four-species guild of larval anurans through field surveys and a series of laboratory experiments quantifying their activity level, anti-predatory responses, swim performance, and escape behavior. Activity level was a good predictor of susceptibility to predation and habitat association for most species in our study, but not all species fit the pattern. Secondary anti-predator mechanisms contributed to differences in susceptibility to predation. Some species were more capable of avoiding predation through swim performance and escape behavior, thus allowing them to occupy a greater range of the water permanency continuum than was predicted by activity level alone. Because performance traits are deeply rooted, evolutionary history plays a major role in determining tadpole performance and life-history traits. Whole-organism performance traits (e.g., swim performance, escape behavior) have not generally been considered in the classic activity-predation paradigm. Our results show that accounting for individual and species-level performance reveals the understudied, yet important role of species-specific performance traits in disentangling the mechanisms driving community assembly.
This is a preview of subscription content,
to check access.





Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams PA (1991) Life history and the relationship between food availability and foraging effort. Ecology 72:1242–1252
Alford RA, Harris RN (1988) Effects of larval growth on anuran metamorphosis. Am Nat 131:91–106
Altig R, McDiarmid RW (2015) Handbook of larval amphibians of the United States and Canada. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Anholt BR, Werner EE (1995) Interaction between food availability and predation mortality mediated by adaptive behavior. Ecology 76:2230–2234
Banks B, Beebee TJC (1988) Reproductive success of natterjack toads Bufo calamita in two contrasting habitats. J Anim Ecol 57:475–492
Bragg AN (1944) Breeding habits, eggs, and tadpoles of Scaphiopus hurterii. Copeia 1944:230–240
Bragg AN (1967) Recent studies on the spadefoot toads. Bios 38:75–84
Bridges CM (2002) Tadpoles balance foraging and predator avoidance: effects of predation, pond drying, and hunger. J Herpetol 36:627–634
Brockelman WY (1969) An analysis of density effects and predation in Bufo americanus tadpoles. Ecology 50:632–644
Caldwell JLP, Thorp H, Jervey TO (1980) Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs. Oecologia 46:285–289
Chandler HC, Rypel AL, Jiao Y, Haas CA, Gorman TA (2016b) Hindcasting historical breeding conditions for an endangered salamander in ephemeral wetlands of the southeastern USA: Implications of climate change. PLoS ONE 11:e0150169
Chandler HC, Gorman TA, Haas CA (2016a) The effects of crayfish predation and vegetation cover on tadpole growth, survival, and nonlethal injury. J Herpetol 50:271–277
Cronin JT, Travis J (1986) Size-limited predation on larval Rana areolata (Anuran: Ranidae) by two species of backswimmer (Insecta: Hemiptera: Notonectidae). Herpetologica 42:171–174
Dayton GH, Fitzgerald LA (2001) Competition, predation, and the distribution of four desert anurans. Oecologia 129:430–435
Dayton GH, Fitzgerald LA (2011) The advantage of no defense: predation enhances cohort survival in a desert amphibian. Aquat Ecol 45:325–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-011-9356-x
Dayton GH, Saenz D, Baum KA, Langerhans RB, Dewitt TJ (2005) Body shape, burst speed and escape behavior of larval anurans. Oikos 111:582–591
Dicke M, Burrough PA (1988) Using fractal dimensions for characterizing tortuosity of animal trails. Physiol Entomol 13:393–398
Espanha J, de Vasconcelos MF, Eterovick PC (2016) The role of tadpole coloration against visually oriented predators. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:255–267
Gazzola A, Balestrieri A, Ghitti M, Paganelli D, Galeotti P (2017) Behavioural and life history responses to predation risk by common frog tadpoles exposed to two predators during ontogeny. Acta Ethol 20:235–241
Gleason JE, Rooney RC (2017) Pond permanence is a key determinant of aquatic macroinvertebrate community structure in wetlands. Freshw Biol 63:264–277
Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190
Hansen KL (1958) Breeding pattern of the eastern spadefoot toad. Herpetologica 14(2):57–67
Heyer WR, McDiarmid RW, Weigmann DL (1975) Tadpoles, predation, and pond habitats in the tropics. Biotropica 7:100–111
Hillis DM, Wilcox TP (2005) Phylogeny of the New World true frogs (Rana). Mol Phylogenet Evol 43:299–314
Huffard CL (2006) Locomotion by Abdopus aculeatus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae): walking the line between primary and secondary defenses. J Exp Biol 209:3697–3707
Johnson JB, Saenz D, Adams CK, Hibbitts TJ (2015) Naturally occurring variation in tadpole morphology and performance linked to predator regime. Ecol Evol 5:2991–3002
Kanou M, Shimozawa T (1983) The elicitation of the predatory labial strike of dragonfly larvae in response to a purely mechanical stimulus. J Exp Biol 107:391–404
Kloskowski J, Nieoczym M, Stryjecki R (2020) Between-habitat distributions of pond tadpoles and their insect predators in response to fish presence. Hydrobiologia 847:1343–1356
Lawler SP (1989) Behavioral responses to predators and predation risk in four species of larval anurans. Anim Behav 38:1039–1047
Lent EM, Babbit KJ (2020) The effect of hydroperiod and predator density on growth, development, and morphology of wood frogs (Rana sylvatica). Aquat Ecol 54:369–386
Ludwig D, Rowe L (1990) Life-history strategies for energy gain and predator avoidance under time constraints. Am Nat 135:686–707
Matich P, Schalk CM (2019) Move it or lose it: interspecific variation in risk response of pond-breeding anurans. PeerJ 7:e6956
McPeek MA (1990) Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71:83–98
Morin PJ (1981) Predatory salamanders reverse the outcome of competition among three species of anuran tadpoles. Science 212:1284–1286
Morin PJ (1983) Predation, competition, and the composition of larval anuran guilds. Ecol Monogr 53:119–138
Nams VO (1996) The VFractal: a new estimator for fractal dimension of animal movement paths. Landscape Ecol 11:289–297
Oakley B, Palka JM (1967) Prey capture by dragonfly larvae. Am Zool 7:727–728
Pacheco EO, Almeida-Gomes M, Santana DJ, Guariento RD (2019) Space use and phenotypic plasticity in tadpoles under predation risk. Hydrobiologia 837:77–86
Palis JG (2005) Scaphiopus holbrookii. In: Lannoo M (ed) Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States Species. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 511–512
Pintar MR, Resetarits WJ Jr (2017) Relative predation risk and risk of desiccation co-determine oviposition preferences in Cope’s gray treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Oecologia 184:423–430
Powell R, Conant R, Collins JT (2016) A field guide to the reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston
Pritchard G (1965) Prey capture by dragonfly larvae (Odonata; Anisoptera). Can J Zool 43:271–279
Pujol-Buxó E, Garriga N, Richter-Boix A, Llorente GA (2016) Growth strategies of tadpoles along the pond permanency gradient. Evol Ecol 30:1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9859-y
Ramamonjisoa N, Mori A (2019) Growth, developmental, and size structure responses in tadpole prey under increasing threat from gape-limited newts. Can J Zool 97:1116–1121
Ramamonjisoa N, Rakotonoely H, Natuhara Y (2018a) Differential vulnerability of two sympatric tadpoles to an invasive crayfish predator. Hydrobiologia 818:119–127
Ramamonjisoa N, Rakotonoely H, Natuhara Y (2018b) Defense investments and growth responses under different predation risks and gape-limitation predation threats in a tadpole prey. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72:144
Ramamonjisoa N, Oiire C, Zheng XJ, Kimura S (2019) Predation decreases cohort foraging activity and growth, yet increases individual size variation in prey. Evol Ecol 33:233–242
Richards SJ, Bull CM (1990) Size-limited predation in tadpoles of three Australian frogs. Copeia 1990:1041–1046
Richter-Boix A, Llorente GA, Montori A (2007) A comparative study of predator-induced phenotype in tadpoles across a pond permanency gradient. Hydrobiologia 583:43–56
Saenz D (2004) Ecological correlates of anuran breeding activity and community structure. PhD. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Schalk CM (2016) Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in an arid-adapted tropical tadpole. Aust Ecol 41:409–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12327
Schiwitz NC, Schalk CM, Saenz D (2020) Activity level-predation risk tradeoff in a tadpole guild: implications for community organization along the hydroperiod gradient. Am Mid Nat 183:223–232
Skelly DK (1992) Field evidence for a cost of behavioral antipredator response in a larval amphibian. Ecology 73:704–708
Skelly DK (1994) Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. Anim Behav 47:465–468
Skelly DK (1995) A behavioral trade-off and its consequences for the distribution of Pseudacris treefrog larvae. Ecology 76:150–164
Skelly DK (1996) Pond drying, predator, and the distribution of Pseudacris tadpoles. Copeia 1996:599–605
Skelly DK (1997) Tadpole communities: pond permanence and predation are powerful forces shaping the structure of tadpole communities. Am Sci 85:36–45
Skelly DK, Richardson JL (2010) Larval sampling. In: Dodd CK (ed) Amphibian ecology and conservation: a handbook of techniques, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 55–70
Skelly DK, Werner EE (1990) Behavioral and life-history responses of larval American toads to an Odonate predator. Ecology 71:2313–2322
Smith DC (1983) Factors controlling tadpole populations of the chorus frog (Pseudacris triseriata) on Isle Royale, Michigan. Ecology 64:501–510
Smith DC, Van Buskirk J (1995) Phenotypic design and ecological performance in two tadpole species. Am Nat 145:211–233
Start D (2020) Phenotypic plasticity and community composition interactively shape trophic interactions. Oikos 129:1163–1173
Stoks R, McPeek MA (2003) Predators and life histories shape Lestes damselfly assemblages along a freshwater habitat gradient. Ecology 84:1576–1587
Tavares-Junior C, Eskinazi-Sant'Anna EM, Silvério Pires MR (2020) Environmental drivers of tadpole community structure in temporary and permanent ponds. Limnologica 81:125764
Touchon JC, Vonesh JR (2016) Variation in abundance and efficacy of tadpole predators in a Neotropical pond community. J Herpetol 50:113–119
Touchon JC, McCoy MW, Landberg T, Vonesh JR, Warkentin KM (2015) Putting μ/g in a new light: plasticity in life history switch points reflects fine-scale adaptive responses. Ecology 96:2192–2202
Travis J, Keen WH, Julianna J (1985) The role of relative body size in a predator-prey relationship between dragonfly naiads and larval anurans. Oikos 45:59–65
Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337–363
Werner EE (1991) Nonlethal effects of a predator on competitive interactions between two anuran larvae. Ecology 72:1709–1720
Werner EE (1992) Individual behavior and higher-order species interactions. Am Nat 140:S5–S32
Werner EE, Anholt BR (1993) Ecological consequences of the tradeoff between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am Nat 142:242–272
Werner EE, McPeek MA (1994) Direct and indirect effects of predators on two anuran species along an environmental gradient. Ecology 75:1368–1382
Werner EE, Skelly DK, Relyea RA, Yurewicz L (2007) Amphibian richness across environmental gradients. Oikos 116:1697–1712
Wilbur HM (1972) Competition, predation and the structure of the Ambystoma-Rana sylvatica community. Ecology 53:3–21
Woodward BD (1983) Predatory-prey interactions and breeding-pond use of temporary-pond species in a desert anuran community. Ecology 64:1549–1555
Zlotnik S, Darnell GM, Bernal XE (2018) Anuran predators overcome visual illusion: dazzle coloration does not protect moving prey. Anim Cogn 21:729–733
Acknowledgements
We thank Nancy Koerth for assistance on statistical analyses and critical review of the manuscript. We thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments used to improve this manuscript. This work is supported, in part, by the McIntire-Stennis from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. This is publication number 1626 from the Biodiversity Research and Teaching Collections.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saenz, D., Baum, K.A., Fitzgerald, L.A. et al. Refining the activity level-predation risk paradigm in larval anuran communities. Aquat Sci 83, 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-020-00752-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-020-00752-w