Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation: the importance of spatial patterns for facilitation

Aquatic Sciences volume 81, Article number: 17 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Facilitation (enhancement of propagule retention in this case) is increasingly recognized as an important driver of biodiversity, but it is still unknown if facilitation during dispersal and colonization is affected by self-organized spatial pattern formation. We investigated the ability of in-stream submerged macrophyte patches to trap the vegetative propagules of three species (Berula erecta, Groenlandia densa, Elodea nuttallii in two size classes: 13–22 and 40–48 cm long), and to potentially benefit the colonization of these three species. We tested the effects of propagule traits, hydrodynamic forcing, and spatial patch configuration on propagule trapping. Propagule buoyancy was negatively correlated with trapping chance, while propagule size did not influence trapping. Species-specific differences in buoyancy were maintained for weeks after fragmentation. Propagule retention was interactive and conditional upon the interplay between incoming flow velocities and vegetation spatial patterning. In the flume experiment at low flows, a patchy configuration (one patch filling 66% of the flume width) retained more surface-drifting propagules (B. erecta, G. densa), than near-homogeneous cover (two patches close together, filling the entire flume width). In contrast, retention of sinking E. nuttallii propagules increased in the two-patch configurations. In flume and field releases where patches did not completely fill the channel width, water flowed around the patches rather than over or through them. This resulted in low-flow velocity areas within patches where canopies were upright and propagules were retained, and higher velocity flows around patches. In contrast, when vegetation filled the channel width, water could not be diverted laterally around the patches and preferentially flowed over them, causing the canopies to bend and reduce their trapping capacity. In flume experiments at high flows, retention of all species decreased, regardless of vegetation configuration, as propagules passed over the reconfigured vegetation canopies. These findings on the interplay of water movement and patch reconfiguration suggest that environmental heterogeneity generated by the self-organizing behavior of aquatic plants might enhance colonization of sessile organisms, calling for landscape-scale processes like dispersal to be better investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

Modified from Riis (2008)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Data Availabitiy

Data associated with this manuscript will be available from https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:ce95f637-3487-4b24-81d4-2549c81e0ac0.

References

  • Aerts R, Maes W, November E, Behailu M, Poesen J, Deckers J, Hermy M, Muys B (2006) Surface runoff and seed trapping efficiency of shrubs in a regenerating semiarid woodland in northern Ethiopia. CATENA 65:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2005.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar MR, Sala OE (1997) Seed distribution constrains the dynamics of the Patagonian steppe. Ecology 78:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain M-H, Bornette G, Hering-Vilas-Bôas A (1998) Comparative abilities of vegetative regeneration among aquatic plants growing in disturbed habitats. Aquat Bot 60:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain M-H, Henry CP, Bornette G (1999) Regeneration and colonization of aquatic plant fragments in relation to the disturbance frequency of their habitats. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 145:111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrat-Segretain M-H, Elger A, Sagnes P, Puijalon S (2002) Comparison of three life-history traits of invasive Elodea canadensis Michx. and Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) H. St John. Aquat Bot 74:299–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Callaway R (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Leonard GH (1997) The role of positive interactions in communities: lessons from intertidal habitats. Ecology 78:1976–1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Leonard GH, Levine JM, Schmidt PR, Ingraham AO (1999) Testing the relative contribution of positive and negative interactions in rocky intertidal communities. Ecology 80:2711–2726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boedeltje G, Bakker JP, Bekker RM, Van Groenendael JM, Soesbergen M (2003) Plant dispersal in a lowland stream in relation to occurrence and three specific life-history traits of the species in the species pool. J Ecol 91:855–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boedeltje G, Bakker JP, Ten Brinke A, Van Groenendael JM, Soesbergen M (2004) Dispersal phenology of hydrochorous plants in relation to discharge, seed release time and buoyancy of seeds: the flood pulse concept supported. J Ecol 92:786–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornette G, Puijalon S (2011) Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review. Aquat Sci 73:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borthagaray AI, Carranza A (2007) Mussels as ecosystem engineers: their contribution to species richness in a rocky littoral community. Acta Oecol 31:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma T, De Vries M, Low E, Peralta G, Tánczos I, van de Koppel J, Herman PMJ (2005) Trade-offs related to ecosystem engineering: a case study on stiffness of emerging macrophytes. Ecology 86:2187–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma T, Van Duren L, Temmerman S, Claverie T, Blanco-Garcia A, Ysebaert T, Herman P (2007) Spatial flow and sedimentation patterns within patches of epibenthic structures: combining field, flume and modelling experiments. Cont Shelf Res 27:1020–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma T, Friedrichs M, Klaassen P, van Kasenbeeck B, Brun F, Temmerman S, Van Katwijk M, Graf G, Herman P (2009) Effects of shoot stiffness, shoot size and current velocity on scouring sediment from around seedlings and propagules. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 388:293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielbörger K, Travis JM, Anthelme F (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol 96:18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol 18:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM (1994) Facilitative and interfering effects of Arthrocnemum subterminale on winter annuals. Ecology 75:681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM (1995) Positive interactions among plants. Bot Rev 61:306–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM (2007) Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Lodge DM (1986) Effects of submersed macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquat Bot 26:341–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carthey AJ, Fryirs KA, Ralph TJ, Bu H, Leishman MR (2016) How seed traits predict floating times: a biophysical process model for hydrochorous seed transport behaviour in fluvial systems. Freshw Biol 61:19–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cellot B, Mouillot F, Henry CP (1998) Flood drift and propagule bank of aquatic macrophytes in a riverine wetland. J Veg Sci 9:631–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwell TB, Engelhardt KA (2008) Effects of pre-existing submersed vegetation and propagule pressure on the invasion success of Hydrilla verticillata. J Appl Ecol 45:515–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang E, Veeneklaas R, Buitenwerf R, Bakker J, Bouma T (2008) To move or not to move: determinants of seed retention in a tidal marsh. Funct Ecol 22:720–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook CD, Urmi-König K (1985) A revision of the genus Elodea (Hydrocharitaceae). Aquat Bot 21:111–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornacchia L, Licci S, van de Koppel J, van der Wal D, Wharton G, Puijalon S, Bouma TJ (2016) Flow velocity and morphology of a submerged patch of the aquatic species Veronica anagallis-aquatica L. In: RowiÅ„ski PM, Marion A (eds) Hydrodynamic and mass transport at freshwater aquatic interfaces. Springer, Cham, pp 141–152

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cornacchia L, van de Koppel J, van der Wal D, Wharton G, Puijalon S, Bouma TJ (2018) Landscapes of facilitation: how self-organized patchiness of aquatic macrophytes promotes diversity in streams. Ecology 99:832–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton J, Wharton G, Bass J, Heppell C, Wotton R (2006) The effects of seasonal changes to in-stream vegetation cover on patterns of flow and accumulation of sediment. Geomorphology 77:320–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK (1972) Toward an understanding of community resilience and the potential effects of enrichments to the benthos at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. In: Proceedings of the colloquium on conservation problems in Antarctica, 1972. Allen Press Lawrence, KS, pp 81–96

  • Demars B, Gornall R (2003) Identification of British species of Callitriche by means of isozymes. Watsonia 24:389–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Engström J, Nilsson C, Jansson R (2009) Effects of stream restoration on dispersal of plant propagules. J Appl Ecol 46:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppinga MB, De Ruiter PC, Wassen MJ, Rietkerk M (2009) Nutrients and hydrology indicate the driving mechanisms of peatland surface patterning. Am Nat 173:803–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follett EM, Nepf HM (2012) Sediment patterns near a model patch of reedy emergent vegetation. Geomorphology 179:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca MS, Zieman JC, Thayer GW, Fisher JS (1983) The role of current velocity in structuring eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) meadows Estuarine. Coast Shelf Sci 17:367–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambi MC, Nowell AR, Jumars PA (1990) Flume observations on flow dynamics in Zostera marina (eelgrass) beds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 61:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis L, Bouma T, Kiswara W, Ziegler A, Herman P (2014) Leaf transport in mimic mangrove forests and seagrass beds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 498:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodson J, Gurnell A, Angold P, Morrissey I (2001) Riparian seed banks: structure, process and implications for riparian management. Prog Phys Geogr 25:301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodson J, Gurnell A, Angold P, Morrissey I (2003) Evidence for hydrochory and the deposition of viable seeds within winter flow-deposited sediments: the River Dove, Derbyshire. UK River Res Appl 19:317–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granata T, Serra T, Colomer J, Casamitjana X, Duarte C, Gacia E (2001) Flow and particle distributions in a nearshore seagrass meadow before and after a storm. Mar Ecol Progress Ser 218:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell AM (2007) Analogies between mineral sediment and vegetative particle dynamics fluvial systems. Geomorphology 89:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell AM, O’Hare MT, O’Hare JM, Scarlett P, Liffen TM (2013) The geomorphological context and impact of the linear emergent macrophyte, Sparganium erectum L.: a statistical analysis of observations from. Br Rivers Earth Surf Process Landf 38:1869–1880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam SM (1978) River plants: the macrophyte vegetation of watercourses. Cambridge Univer Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra CA, Liston GE, Reiners WA (2002) Snow redistribution by wind and interactions with vegetation at upper treeline in the Medicine Bow Mountains, Wyoming, USA. Arct Antarctic Alp Res 34:262–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson ME, Nilsson C (1993) Hydrochory, population dynamics and distribution of the clonal aquatic plant Ranunculus lingua. J Ecol 81:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. In: Samson FB, Knopf FL (eds) Ecosystem management. Springer, New York, NY, pp 130–147

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kondziolka JM, Nepf HM (2014) Vegetation wakes and wake interaction shaping aquatic landscape evolution Limnology and Oceanography. Fluids Environ 4:106–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen LG, Harvey JW (2010) How vegetation and sediment transport feedbacks drive landscape change in the Everglades and wetlands worldwide. Am Nat 176:E66–E79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen LG, Harvey JW, Crimaldi JP (2007) A delicate balance: ecohydrological feedbacks governing landscape morphology in a lotic peatland. Ecol Monogr 77:591–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licci S, Delolme C, Marmonier P, Philippe M, Cornacchia L, Gardette V, Bouma T, Puijalon S (2016) Effect of aquatic plant patches on flow and sediment characteristics: the case of Callitriche platycarpa and Elodea nuttallii. In: RowiÅ„ski M, Marion P A (eds) Hydrodynamic and mass transport at freshwater aquatic interfaces: 34th International School of Hydraulics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27750-9_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist B (2002) Aquatic invertebrates in riverine landscapes. Freshw Biol 47:679–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntire EJ, Fajardo A (2014) Facilitation as a ubiquitous driver of biodiversity. New Phytol 201:403–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee KL, Rooth JE, Feller IC (2007) Mangrove recruitment after forest disturbance is facilitated by herbaceous species in the Caribbean. Ecol Appl 17:1678–1693. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1614.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt DM, Wohl EE (2002) Processes governing hydrochory along rivers: hydraulics, hydrology, and dispersal phenology. Ecol Appl 12:1071–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minckley W (1963) The ecology of a spring stream: Doe Run, Meade County, Kentucky. Wildl Monogr 11:3–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Niering W, Whittaker R, Lowe C (1963) The saguaro: a population in relation to environment. Science 142:15–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Brown RL, Jansson R, Merritt DM (2010) The role of hydrochory in structuring riparian and wetland vegetation. Biol Rev 85:837–858

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare JM, O’Hare MT, Gurnell AM, Scarlett PM, Liffen T, McDonald C (2012) Influence of an ecosystem engineer, the emergent macrophyte Sparganium erectum, on seed trapping in lowland rivers and consequences for landform colonisation. Freshw Biol 57:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2006) The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments. Front Ecol Environ 4:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson JM, Bell SS (2012) Tidal events and salt-marsh structure influence black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) recruitment across and ecotone. Ecology 93:1648–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pueyo Y, Kefi S, Alados C, Rietkerk M (2008) Dispersal strategies and spatial organization of vegetation in arid ecosystems. Oikos 117:1522–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.1. 2): R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  • Rabinowitz D (1978) Dispersal properties of mangrove propagules. Biotropica 10:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietkerk M, van de Koppel J (2008) Regular pattern formation in real ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 23:169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis T (2008) Dispersal and colonisation of plants in lowland streams: success rates bottlenecks. Hydrobiologia 596:341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis T, Biggs BJF (2003) Hydrologic and hydraulic control of macrophyte establishment and performance in streams. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1488–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riis T, Sand-Jensen K (2006) Dispersal of plant fragments in small streams. Freshw Biol 51:274–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen K (1998) Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near-bed flow in lowland streams. Freshw Biol 39:663–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen K, Mebus JR (1996) Fine-scale patterns of water velocity within macrophyte patches in streams. Oikos 76:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen K, Pedersen ML (2008) Streamlining of plant patches in streams. Freshw Biol 53:714–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand-Jensen K, Andersen K, Andersen T (1999) Dynamic properties of recruitment, expansion and mortality of macrophyte patches in streams. Int Rev Hydrobiol 84:497–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarneel J (2013) The dispersal capacity of vegetative propagules of riparian fen species. Hydrobiologia 710:219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Säumel I, Kowarik I (2013) Propagule morphology and river characteristics shape secondary water dispersal in tree species. Plant Ecol 214:1257–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoelynck J, De Groote T, Bal K, Vandenbruwaene W, Meire P, Temmerman S (2012) Self-organised patchiness and scale-dependent bio-geomorphic feedbacks in aquatic river vegetation. Ecography 35:760–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoelynck J, Meire D, Bal K, Buis K, Troch P, Bouma T, Meire P, Temmerman S (2013) Submerged macrophytes avoiding a negative feedback in reaction to hydrodynamic stress. Limnol Ecol Manag Inland Waters 43:371–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sculthorpe CD (1967) Biology of aquatic vascular plants. St. Martin’s, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soomers H, Karssenberg D, Soons MB, Verweij PA, Verhoeven JT, Wassen MJ (2013) Wind and water dispersal of wetland plants across fragmented landscapes. Ecosystems 16:434–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soons MB, Groot GA, Cuesta Ramirez MT, Fraaije RG, Verhoeven JT, Jager M (2017) Directed dispersal by an abiotic vector: Wetland plants disperse their seeds selectively to suitable sites along the hydrological gradient via water. Funct Ecol 31:499–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temmerman S, Bouma T, Van de Koppel J, Van der Wal D, De Vries M, Herman P (2007) Vegetation causes channel erosion in a tidal landscape. Geology 35:631–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomaz SM, Mormul RP, Michelan TS (2015) Propagule pressure, invasibility of freshwater ecosystems by macrophytes and their ecological impacts: a review of tropical freshwater ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 746:39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner T (1983) Facilitation as a successional mechanism in a rocky intertidal community. Am Nat 121:729–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Koppel J, Altieri AH, Silliman BR, Bruno JF, Bertness MD (2006) Scale-dependent interactions and community structure on cobble beaches. Ecol Lett 9:45–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Heide T, Bouma TJ, Van Nes EH, Van De Koppel J, Scheffer M, Roelofs JG, Van Katwijk MM, Smolders AJ (2010) Spatial self-organized patterning in seagrasses along a depth gradient of an intertidal ecosystem. Ecology 91:362–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Stocken T, De Ryck D, Vanschoenwinkel BB, Bouma T, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Koedam N (2015) Impact of landscape structure on propagule dispersal in mangrove forests. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 524:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbruwaene W, Temmerman S, Bouma T, Klaassen P, De Vries M, Callaghan D, Van Steeg P, Dekker F, Van Duren L, Martini E (2011) Flow interaction with dynamic vegetation patches: implications for biogeomorphic evolution of a tidal landscape. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 116:F01008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerman EJ, Van de Koppel J, Eppinga MB, Montserrat F, Liu QX, Herman PM (2010) Spatial self-organization on intertidal mudflats through biophysical stress divergence. Am Nat 176:E15–E32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wharton G, Cotton JA, Wotton RS, Bass JA, Heppell CM, Trimmer M, Sanders IA, Warren LL (2006) Macrophytes and suspension-feeding invertebrates modify flows and fine sediments in the Frome and Piddle catchments, Dorset (UK). J Hydrol 330:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Research Executive Agency, through the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Union, Support for Training and Career Development of Researchers (Marie Curie - FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN), which funded the Initial Training Network (ITN) HYTECH ‘Hydrodynamic Transport in Ecologically Critical Heterogeneous Interfaces’, N.316546. We thank the CNR (Compagnie Nationale du Rhône) for providing access to field sites. We thank the Associate Editor and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments that have improved the quality of our manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sara Puijalon

    Present address: UMR 5023 LEHNA, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, ENTPE, Villeurbanne Cedex, France

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Department of Estuarine and Delta Systems, and Utrecht University, P.O. Box 140, 4400 AC, Yerseke, The Netherlands

    Loreta Cornacchia, Daphne van der Wal, Johan van de Koppel & Tjeerd J. Bouma

  2. UMR 5023 LEHNA, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, ENTPE, Villeurbanne Cedex, France

    Loreta Cornacchia

  3. School of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

    Geraldene Wharton

  4. Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, PO Box 11103, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Loreta Cornacchia, Johan van de Koppel & Tjeerd J. Bouma

  5. Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Daphne van der Wal

Authors
  1. Loreta Cornacchia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daphne van der Wal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johan van de Koppel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sara Puijalon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Geraldene Wharton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tjeerd J. Bouma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loreta Cornacchia.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cornacchia, L., van der Wal, D., van de Koppel, J. et al. Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation: the importance of spatial patterns for facilitation. Aquat Sci 81, 17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0612-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0612-1

Keywords

search

Navigation